(457 mg, 2.32 mmol) was added as a solution in diethyl ether
(23 mL), and the resulting suspension was maintained at room
temperature with stirring for 2 h. Following this time, ketone 5
(870 mg, 3.47 mmol) was added to the reaction as a solution in
diethyl ether (5 mL). The reaction was maintained for 1 h with
stirring at room temperature and then quenched by the addition
of saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution (5 mL). Water (10 mL)
was added and the biphasic solution was extracted with diethyl
ether (25 mL). The organic phase was washed sequentially with
saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (25 mL) and brine (25 mL), dried
with MgSO4, and concentrated under vacuum. The crude isolate
was purified by flash chromatography (30 : 1 petroleum ether : ethyl
ether eluent) to yield tertiary alcohol 12 (556 mg, 65% yield): Rf
a short column of MgSO4, concentrated under vacuum, and
purified by flash chromatography (50 : 1 → 25 : 1 hexanes : ethyl
acetate eluent) to yield tetracycle 14 (30.4 mg, 61% yield): Rf 0.41
(10 : 1 hexanes : ethyl acetate); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.45
(dd, J = 7.7, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.12 (m, 2H), 7.11–7.02 (m, 2H),
7.02–6.97 (m, 1H), 6.85 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (dd, J =
8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 3.29 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (d, J = 16.1 Hz,
1H), 1.98 (s, 3H), 1.76 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)
d 151.06, 135.87, 133.19, 128.20, 128.18, 128.06, 127.42, 126.75,
125.72, 124.58, 120.71, 116.81, 97.66, 73.08, 43.09, 27.62, 26.67;
IR (NaCl/film) 2994, 2932, 1607, 1585, 1484, 1452, 1382, 1299,
1275, 1249, 1115, 1081, 978, 899, 879, 760 cm-1; HRMS (MM:
ESI-APCI) m/z calc’d for C17H17O2 [M+H]+: 253.1223, found
253.1211.
1
0.38 (10 : 1 hexanes : ethyl acetate); H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)
d 7.45 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.18–7.11 (m, 2H), 7.08–7.00 (m,
2H), 6.93 (dd, J = 17.3, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 6.88–6.81 (m, 2H), 6.78 (dd,
J = 7.7, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (dd, J = 17.3, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (dd,
J = 10.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (s, 1H), 3.37 (d, J = 13.4 Hz, 1H), 3.31
(d, J = 13.4 Hz, 1H), 1.56 (s, 3H), 1.08 (s, 9H), 0.42 (s, 3H), 0.39
(s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) d 153.22, 138.25, 135.68,
135.53, 135.46, 132.02, 128.16, 127.97, 127.22, 126.77, 125.89,
121.24, 118.46, 115.23, 76.45, 44.79, 27.07, 26.30, 18.70, –3.36,
–3.64; IR (NaCl/film) 3532, 2931, 2859, 1598, 1577, 1485, 1445,
1255, 1234, 1052, 906, 838, 781, 753 cm-1; HRMS (FAB+) m/z
calc’d for C23H33O2Si [M+H]+: 369.2250, found 369.2260.
Acknowledgements
This publication is based on work supported by Award No.
KUS-11-006-02, made by King Abdullah University of Science
and Technology (KAUST). Financial support from Caltech, the
Rose Hills Foundation (undergraduate fellowship to P.B.), and the
California HIV/AIDS Research Program (graduate fellowship to
P.M.T.) is also gratefully acknowledged.
Notes and references
1 Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; World Health
Organization. AIDS epidemic update: Special report on HIV/AIDS;
December 2006; Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
Diol 4
To a solution of silyl ether 12 (475 mg, 1.29 mmol) in THF (3 mL)
was added TBAF (1 M solution in THF, 1.41 mL, 1.42 mmol).
The resulting solution was then maintained with stirring at room
temperature until silyl ether 12 was consumed by TLC analysis
(about 1 h). The reaction was diluted with water (10 mL) and
then extracted with diethyl ether (25 mL). The organic phase was
washed with water (3 ¥ 10 mL) and brine (10 mL), dried with
MgSO4, and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was
purified by flash chromatography (12 : 1 → 10 : 1 hexanes : ethyl
acetate eluent) to yield diol 4 (291 mg, 89% yield): Rf 0.22 (10 : 1
2 (a) A. A. Johnson, C. Marchand and Y. Pommier, Curr. Top. Med.
Chem., 2004, 4, 1059–1077; (b) R. Dayam and N. Neamati, Curr. Pharm.
Des., 2003, 9, 1789–1802; (c) M. Witvrouw, B. V. Maele, J. Vercammen,
A. Hantson, Y. Engelborghs, E. D. e. Clerq, C. Pannecouque and Z.
Bebyser, Curr. Drug Metab., 2004, 5, 291–304; (d) S. D. Young, Curr.
Opin. Drug Disc. Devel., 2001, 4, 402–410; (e) D. J. Hazuda, P. Felock,
M. Witmer, A. Wolfe, K. Stillmock, J. A. Grobler, A. Espeseth, L.
Gabryelski, W. Schleif, C. Blau and M. D. Miller, Science, 2000, 287,
646–650.
3 S. B. Singh, D. L. Zink, D. S. Quamina, F. Pelaez, A. Teran, P. Felock
and D. J. Hazuda, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 2351–2354.
4 (a) J. S. Foot, G. M. P. Giblin and R. J. K. Taylor, Org. Lett., 2003, 5,
4441–4444; (b) J. S. Foot, G. M. P. Giblin, A. C. Whitwood and R. J.
K. Taylor, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2005, 3, 756–763; (c) C. V. Ramana, C.
N. Reddy and R. G. Gonnade, Chem. Commun., 2008, 3151–3153.
5 (a) S. Krishnan, J. T. Bagdanoff, D. C. Ebner, Y. K. Ramtohul, U. K.
Tambar and B. M. Stoltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 13745–13754;
(b) Q. Liu, E. M. Ferreira and B. M. Stoltz, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72,
7352–7358; (c) U. K. Tambar, D. C. Ebner and B. M. Stoltz, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 11752–11753; (d) N. K. Garg, D. D. Caspi and
B. M. Stoltz, Synlett, 2006, 3081–3087; (e) N. K. Garg, D. D. Caspi and
B. M. Stoltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 5970–5978; (f) N. K. Garg,
D. D. Caspi and B. M. Stoltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 9552–9553.
6 J. A. Seijas, M. Pilar Va´zquez-Tato, C. Entenza, M. Montserrat
1
hexanes : ethyl acetate); H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d 9.11 (s,
1H), 7.55 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.25 (m, 1H), 7.25–7.14
(m, 2H), 7.12–6.96 (m, 3H), 6.89 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.87–
6.79 (m, 1H), 5.63 (dd, J = 17.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (dd, J = 10.9,
1.3 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (d, J = 13.9 Hz,
1H), 2.51 (s, 1H), 1.59 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3)
d 155.81, 138.43, 135.12, 133.51, 132.13, 129.72, 129.09, 127.53,
127.46, 126.37, 126.12, 119.54, 117.76, 116.21, 79.13, 44.54, 28.12;
IR (NaCl/film) 3306, 1618, 1582, 1491, 1453, 1374, 1293, 1237,
1154, 1095, 1036, 989, 914, 865, 752 cm-1; HRMS (FAB+) m/z
calc’d for C17H17O [M+H]+–H2O: 237.1279, found 237.1268.
´
Mart´ınez, M. Gabriela Onega and S. Veiga, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998,
39, 5073–5076.
7 B. Bonnaud, P. Funes, N. Jubault and B. Vacher, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2005, 3360–3369.
Tetracycle 14
8 All attempts to reduce the acid directly (e.g., with LiAlH4) resulted in
significant quantities of the fully reduced product (15), lacking the key
terminal olefin.
A flame-dried reaction flask was charged with PdCl2 (6.9 mg,
0.0393 mmol) and CuCl2 (5.3 mg, 0.0393 mmol). THF (1.5 mL)
was added followed by diol 4 (50 mg, 0.197 mmol) as a solution
in THF (500 mL). The reaction was placed under an oxygen
atmosphere (1 atm) and maintained at room temperature with
vigorous stirring until diol 4 was consumed by TLC analysis (about
24 h). Upon completion, the reaction solution was passed through
5356 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 5354–5357
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©