Table 3 ESI-MS analysis of peptide coupling reaction between PheEP
and GlyOEt (1 : 1.5 ratio)
Acknowledgements
We thank NSERC Canada for support through a Discovery Grant.
Compound
ESI-MS data
251.1 (M + H+)
References
1 A. R. Fersht and M. M. Kaethner, Biochemistry, 1976, 15, 818–823;
P. Berg, J. Biol. Chem., 1958, 233, 601–607; P. Berg, J. Biol. Chem.,
1958, 233, 608–611; D. W. Armstrong, R. Seguin, M. Saburi and J. H.
Fendler, J. Mol. Evol., 1979, 13, 103–113.
2 Formation of aminoacyl tRNA:J. J. Perona, M. A. Rould and T.
A. Steitz, Biochemistry, 1993, 32, 8758–8771; Thioester formation in
NRPS: M. A. Marahiel, T. Stachelhaus and H. D. Mootz, Chem. Rev.,
1997, 97, 2651–2674.
3 G. Disabato and W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1961, 83, 4400–4405;
R. Kluger, R. W. Loo and V. Mazza, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
12089–12094; R. Kluger and L. L. Cameron, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002,
124, 3303–3308.
4 Contributions from our laboratory: R. Kluger, Synlett, 2000, 12, 1708–
1720; L. L. Cameron, S. C. Wang and R. Kluger, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2004, 126, 10721–10726; S. Tzvetkova and R. Kluger, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 15848–15854; R. S. Dhiman and R. Kluger, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 2006–2008.
5 N. H. Duffy and D. A. Dougherty, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 3776–3779; G.
L. Thomas and R. J. Payne, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4260–4262; B. F.
Cravatt, A. T. Wright and J. W. Kozarich, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2008,
77, 383–414; T. M. Coleman, N. Li and F. Q. Huang, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2005, 46, 4307–4310.
6 R. N. Butler and A. G. Coyne, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 6302–6337.
7 R. E. Buckles and C. J. Thelen, Anal. Chem., 1950, 22, 676–678.
8 P. E. Dawson and S. B. H. Kent, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2000, 69, 923–
960.
9 S. Her and R. Kluger, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 676–678.
10 G. Disabato and W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1961, 83, 4393–4400;
J. Wodzinska and R. Kluger, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 4753–4754.
11 ESI-MS analysis of reactions is found in the supplementary informa-
tion.
12 L. A. Carpino, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 4397–4398; L. A. Carpino,
A. Elfaham and F. Albericio, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 2279–2282.
13 R. Kluger, X. Li and R. W. Loo, Can. J. Chem., 1996, 74, 2395–2400.
14 Y. S. Klausner and M. Bodanszky, Synthesis, 1974, 8, 549–559.
This was demonstrated by base hydrolysis of the aminoacyl
phosphate, followed by derivatization with Mosher’s acid chloride.
The resultant materials, when tested against authentic samples,
did not undergo any racemization. By extension, as the peptide
coupling reaction is performed under mildly basic conditions,
there should be no racemization in the dipeptide products. Further,
we examined the1H-NMR spectrum of an aminoacyl phosphate
ester in D2O and found that there is no exchange of the a-proton,
which is a necessary consequence of racemization and is thus
a reliable test. The anionic charge of the phosphate may also
contribute to configurational stability by hydrogen bonding to the
a-proton. Similar effects account for the configurational stability
of acyl azides.14 The anionic charge also repels hydroxide, which is
the necessary catalyst for proton removal.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that aminoacyl phos-
phate monoesters function as effective acyl donors in water in
their reactions with amino acid esters. The pattern is clearly
suitable as a basis for peptide coupling in water in general.
Furthermore, the process permits formation of amides from
amines in the presence of other reactive nucleophiles. Based
on these results, we are broadening the scope of our peptide
coupling protocol as well as expanding the method to related
applications.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 5645–5647 | 5647
©