1874
Med Chem Res (2012) 21:1869–1875
2.83 (t, 2H, CH2), 3.02 (s, 3H, SO2CH3), 3.91 (s, 3H,
minimized structures obtained initially. The quality of
the docked structures was evaluated by measuring the
intermolecular energy of the ligand–enzyme assembly
(Kurumbail et al., 1996).
OCH3), 7.01 (d, 2H, 4-methoxyphenyl H3
& H5,
J = 8.7 Hz), 7.14 (d, 2H, 4-methoxyphenyl H2 & H6,
J = 8.7 Hz), 7.66 (d, 2H, 4-methylsulfonylphenyl H2 &
H6, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.82 (d, 2H, 4-methylsulfonylphenyl H3
& H5, J = 8.6 Hz); LC–MS (ESI) m/z: 383.1 (M ? 1,
100); Anal. Calcd. for C21H22N2O3S: C, 65.94; H, 5.80; N,
7.32. Found: C, 66.15; H, 5.72; N, 7.65.
Acknowledgment This study was financially supported by
Research Deputy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical sciences
as part of thesis of H. Reihanfard.
1-(4-Acetamidopheny)-2-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-
4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-benzo[d] imidazole (2f)
References
Dogne JM, Hanson J, Supuran C, Pratico D (2006) Coxibs and
cardiovascular side effects: from light to shadow. Curr Pharm
Des 12:971–975
Yield, 12.7%; white crystalline powder; mp 100–101°C; IR
1
(KBr disk): t (cm-1) 1150, 1320 (SO2); HNMR (CDCl3,
´
Dogne JM, Supuran CT, Pratico D (2005) Cardiovascular effects of
the coxibs. J Med Chem 48:2251–2257
500 MHz): d 1.88–1.91 (m, 4H, CH2), 2.22 (s, 3H, NHC-
OCH3), 2.41 (t, 2H, CH2), 2.80 (t, 2H, CH2), 3.06 (s, 3H,
SO2CH3), 7.16 (d, 2H, 4-acetamidophenyl H3 & H5,
J = 8.6 Hz), 7.60 (d, 2H, 4-acetamidophenyl H2 & H6,
J = 8.6 Hz), 7.68 (d, 2H, 4-methylsulfonylphenyl H2 &
H6, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.79 (d, 2H, 4-methylsulfonylphenyl H3
& H5, J = 8.4 Hz); LC–MS (ESI) m/z: 410.1 (M ? 1,
100); Anal. Calcd. for C22H23N3O3S: C, 64.53; H, 5.66; N,
10.26. Found: C, 64.75; H, 5.32; N, 10.19.
Fu JY, Masferrer JL, Seibert K, Raz A, Needleman P (1990) The
induction and suppression of prostaglandin H2 synthase (cyclo-
oxygenase) in human monocytes. J Biol Chem 265:16737–16740
Gelens E, De Kanter FJJ, Schmitz RF, Sliedregt LAJM, Van Steen
BJ, Kruse Chris G, Leurs R, Groen MB (2006) Efficient library
synthesis of imidazoles using a multicomponent reaction and
microwave irradiation. Mol Divers 10:17–22
Ghodsi R, Zarghi A, Daraie B, Hedayati M (2010) Design, synthesis
and biological evaluation of new 2,3-diarylquinoline derivatives
as selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem
18:1029–1033
In vitro COX inhibition assays
Herschman HR (1996) Prostaglandin synthase 2. Biochem Biophys
Acta 1299:125–140
Katori M, Majima M (2000) Cyclooxygenase-2: its rich diversity of
roles and possible application of its selective inhibitors. Inflamm
Res 49:367–392
The ability of the test compounds listed in Table 1 to
inhibit ovine COX-1 and COX-2 (IC50 value, lM) was
determined using chemiluminescent enzyme assays kit
(catalog number 560101, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor,
MI, USA) according to our previously reported method
(Zarghi et al., 2007).
Kawamori T, Rao CV, Seibert K, Reddy BS (1998) Chemopreventive
activity of celecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor,
against colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 58:406–412
Kurumbail RG, Stevens AM, Gierse JK, McDonald JJ, Stegeman RA,
Pak JY, Gildehaus D, Miyashiro JM, Penning TD, Seibert K,
Isakson PC, Stallings WC (1996) Structural basis for selective
inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by anti-inflammatory agents.
Nature 384:644–648
Molecular modeling (docking) studies
Navidpour L, Shafaroodi H, Abdi KH, Amini M, Ghahremani MH,
Dehpour AR, Shafiee A (2006) Design, synthesis and biological
evaluation of substituted 3-alkylthio-4,5-diaryl-4H-1,2,4-tria-
zoles as selective COX-2 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 14:
2507–2517
Nivsarkar M, Banerjee A, Padh H (2008) Cyclooxygenase inhibitors:
a novel direction for Alzheimer’s management. Pharmacol Rep
60:692–698
Penning TD, Tally JJ, Bertenshaw SR, Carter JS, Collins PW, Docter
S, Graneto MJ, Lee LF, Malecha JW, Miyashiro JM, Rogers R,
Rogier DJ, Yu SS, Anderson GD, Burton EG, Cogburn JN,
Gregory SA, Koboldt CM, Perkins WE, Seibert K, Veenhuizen
AW, Zhang YY, Isakson PC (1997) Synthesis and biological
evaluation of the 1,5-diarylpyrazole class of cyclooxygenase-2
inhibitors: identification of 4-[5-(4-methylphenyl)-3-(trifluoro-
methyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl] benzenesulfonamide (SC-b58635,
celecoxib). J Med Chem 40:1347–1365
Docking studies were performed using Autodock software
Version 3.0. The coordinates of the X-ray crystal structure
of the selective COX-2 inhibitor SC-558 bound to the
murine COX-2 enzyme was obtained from the RCSB
Protein Data Bank (1cx2) and hydrogens were added. The
ligand molecules were constructed using the Builder
module and were energy minimized for 1,000 iterations
˚
reaching a convergence of 0.01 kcal/mol A. The energy
minimized ligands were superimposed on SC-558 in the
PDB file 1cx2 after which SC-558 was deleted. The pur-
pose of docking is to search for favorable binding config-
uration between the small flexible ligands and the rigid
˚
protein. Protein residues with atoms greater than 7.5 A
from the docking box were removed for efficiency.
Searching is conducted within a specified 3D docking box
using annealing based on the Monte Carlo method and
MMFF94 molecular mechanics force field for 8,000 itera-
tions. These docked structures were very similar to the
Prasit P, Wang Z, Brideau C, Chan CC, Charlson S, Cromlish W,
Ethier D, Evans JF, Ford-Hutchinson AW, Gauthier JY, Gordon
R, Guay J, Gresser M, Kargman S, Kennedy B, Leblanc Y, Leger
S, Mancini JO, Neil GP, Quellet M, Percival MD, Perrier H,
Riendeau D, Rodger I, Tagari P, Therien M, Vikers P, Wong E,
Xu L, Young RN, Zamboni R, Boyce S, Rupniak N, Forrest M,
123