3 L. J. Prins, P. Timmerman and D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2001, 123, 10153; T. E. Kaiser, V. Stepanenko and F. Wurthner, J. Am.
¨
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6719; A. Ajayaghosh, R. Varghese, S. Mahesh
and V. K. Praveen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 7729;
A. J. Wilson, J. V. Gestel, R. P. Sijbesma and E. W. Meijer, Chem.
Commun., 2006, 4404.
4 M. M. Green, S. Zanella, H. Gu, T. Sato, G. Gottorelli, F. K. Jha,
G. P. Spada, A. M. Schoevaars, B. Feringa and A. Teramoto, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 9810; A. P. H. J. Schenning, J. v. Herrikhuyzen,
P. Jonkheijm, Z. Chen, F. Wurthner and E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem.
¨
´
Soc., 2002, 124, 10252; S. J. George, Z. Tomovic, M. M. J. Smulders,
T. F. A. de Greef, P. E. L. G. Leclere, E. W. Meijer and A. P. H. J.
Schenning, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 8206; M. P. Thompson
and R. P. Lemieux, J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 5068; A. Ajayaghosh,
P. Chithra and R. Varghese, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 230;
F. J. M. Hoeben, J. Zhang, C. C. Lee, M. J. Pouderoijen, M. Wolffs,
F. Wurthner, A. P. H. J. Schenning, E. W. Meijer and S. D. Feyter,
¨
Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 8579.
5 G. Celebre, G. D. Luca, M. Maiorino, F. Lemma, A. Ferrarini,
S. Pieraccini and G. P. Spada, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 11736;
B. Isare, M. Linares, L. Zargarian, S. Fermandjian, M. Miura,
S. Motohashi, N. Vanthuyne, R. Lazzaroni and L. Bouteiller,
Scheme 2 Schematic of chiral-induction by helical neighbour.
Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 173; S. J. George, Z. Tomovic, A. P. H. J.
´
Schenning and E. W. Meijer, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 3451.
6 A. Tsuda, M. A. Alam, T. Harada, T. Yamaguchi, N. Ishii and
T. Aida, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 8198; M. Wolffs,
S. J. George, Z. Tomovic, S. C. J. Meskers, A. P. H. J. Schenning
´
and E. W. Meijer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 8203;
fibers happens indiscriminately which results in chiral induction
from the helical NDI-1 fibers to the adjacent DAN-1 fibers
through hydrophobic interaction among the peripheral alkyl
chains. To support this hypothesis we studied self-assembly of
NDI-1 in the presence of another donor DAN-2 (Scheme 1)
which contains peripheral oligo-oxyethylene units instead of
hydrocarbon chains but in which the remaining part of the
molecule is structurally identical to DAN-1. Self-assembly of
DAN-2 alone16 was primarily investigated by solvent-dependent
UV/vis studies (Fig. S4w) which indicated J-type p-stacking.13
The CD-spectra of NDI-1 + DAN-2 in 95 : 5 MCH–CHCl3
was found to be fully matching to that for NDI-1 alone
(Fig. S7w). This clearly supports the hypothesis that indeed
the hydrophobic interaction among the peripheral alkyl chains
of the individual fibers is responsible for the observed chiral
induction for the (NDI-1 + DAN-1) pair which is not possible
for (NDI-1 + DAN-2) because of the immiscibility among
hydrocarbon and oligooxyethylene chains.17
S. Ghosh, X.-Q. Li, V. Stepanenko and F. Wurthner, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2008, 14, 11343.
¨
7 For general references on self-sorting see: A. Pal, S. Karthikeyan and
R. P. Sijbesma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 7842; J. v. Herrikhuyzen,
A. Syamakumari, A. P. H. J. Schenning and E. W. Meijer, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2004, 126, 10021; K. Mahata, M. L. Saha and M. Schmittel, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 15933; H. Northrop, Y.-R. Zheng, Ki-Whan Chi
and P. J. Stang, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 1554; K. Sugiyasu,
S.-i. Kawano, N. Fujita and S. Shinkai, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 2863;
P. Mukhopadhyay, P. Y. Zavalij and L. Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
128, 14093; A. Heeres, C. v. d. Pol, M. Stuart, A. Friggeri, B. L. Feringa
and J. v. Esch, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 14252; J. R. Moffat and
D. K. Smith, Chem. Commun., 2009, 316.
8 M. R. Molla, A. Das and S. Ghosh, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 10084.
9 S. V. Bhosale, C. H. Jani and S. J. Langford, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2008, 37, 331; N. Sakai, J. Mareda, E. Vauthey and S. Matile,
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 4225; P. Mukhopadhyay, Y. Iwashita,
M. Shirakawa, S.-i. Kawano, N. Fujita and S. Shinkai, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 1592.
Herein we have probed H-bonding mediated assembly in
bis-amide functionalized chiral acceptor (NDI) and achiral
donor (DAN) molecules. Due to the mismatch in the distance
between the two amide groups, self-sorting was achieved
resulting in two types of homo-aggregated fibers. CD-experiments
revealed helical assembly for both the donor and acceptor
stacks although an asymmetric centre was present only in the
acceptor building block. This was attributed to induction of
helical-bias from the acceptor-stack to the donor-stack due to
mixing of the self-sorted fibers at macroscopic level by hydro-
phobic interaction among the peripheral alkyl chains. We are
exploring this as a general tool for spectroscopic visualization
of macroscopic-organization of chromophores and polymeric
mixtures which is highly relevant in bulk hetero-junction solar
cells.18
10 M. R. Molla and S. Ghosh, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 95.
11 For recent reviews or organogels, see: M.-O. M. Piepenbrock,
G. O. Lloyd, N. Clarke and J. W. Steed, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 1960;
A. Ajayaghosh and V. K. Praveen, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40, 644;
P. Dastidar, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 2699; S. Banerjee, R. K. Das and
U. Maitra, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 6649; M. Suzuki and
K. Hanabusa, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 455.
12 H. Shao, T. Nguyen, N. C. Romano, D. A. Modarelli and
J. R. Parquette, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 16374.
13 A. Das and S. Ghosh, Chem.–Eur. J., 2010, 16, 13622.
14 As observed in the melting curves, the absolute CD-intensity is slighly
different in two cases which probably arises due to difference in total
chromophore concentration in two separate experiments.
15 Recently we have demonstrated that the relative distances between the
two amide groups in this D–A pair allow effective CT-interaction. For
details, see: A. Das, M. R. Molla, A. Banerjee, A. Paul and S. Ghosh,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 6061.
16 Detail self-assembly studies with DAN-2 in organic and aqueous
medium are underway and will be published elsewhere.
17 For segregated chromophore assembly based on side-chain incompati-
bility, see: T. L. Benanti, P. Saejueng and D. Venkataraman,
Chem. Commun., 2007, 692; T. Sakurai, K. Shi, H. Sato,
K. Tashiro, A. Osuka, A. Saeki, S. Seki, S. Tagawa, S. Sasaki,
H. Masunaga, K. Osaka, M. Takata and T. Aida, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 130, 13812.
Notes and references
1 E. Yishima, K. Maeda, H. Iida, Y. Furusho and K. Nagai, Chem.
Rev., 2009, 109, 6102; J. J. L. M. Cornelissen, A. E. Rowan, R. J.
M. Nolte and N. A. J. M. Sommerdijk, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 4039.
2 F. J. M. Hoeben, P. Jonkheijm, E. W. Meijer and A. P. H.
J. Schenning, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 1491; C. M. Drain,
A. Varotto and I. Radivojevic, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 1630.
18 J.-L. Bredas, J. E. Norton, J. Cornil and V. Coropceanu, Acc.
´
Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 1691.
c
8936 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8934–8936
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011