hetero-DielsꢀAlder reactions, as indicated through litera-
ture survey and recently pointed out by Feng and co-
workers.10
You et al.14a had reported the facile intramolecular trap-
ping of the activated ester by the ketone enol oxygen.
However, a further evaluation of the system let us hy-
pothesize that the reactivity (and/or stability) of the en-
olate A might be modulated through intramolecular
noncovalent interactions (B) and/or formation of cyclic
We reasoned that one difficulty of using the relatively
less-activated chalcones as oxodienes for NHC-catalyzed
intermolecular DielsꢀAlder reactions might be that the
catalytically generated enolates could undergo rapid con-
versions to the corresponding activated esters and subse-
quently end up as carboxylic acids (when trace water was
present) or their derivatives suchas amides and esters when
alcohols and amines were present.11 When enals were used
as the enolate precursors, additional complications came
from the competing NHC-bounded homoenolate equiva-
lent intermediates.5f,9,12 One solution to overcome this
difficulty is perhaps to minimize the conversion of the
enolate to the activated ester intermediates through some
kind of stabilizing or buffering.
1
adduct C.15 Our efforts with H NMR studies did not
detect these interactions or intermediates; nevertheless we
decided to evaluate the reactions of formylcyclopropanes
with chalcones and other electrophiles. Described here are
our highly enantioselective intermolecular DielsꢀAlder
reactions between simple chalcones and formylcyclopro-
panes (eq 2).
Our attention was turned to formylcyclopropanes as
enolate precursors for formal DielsꢀAlder reactions with
chalcones. In 2006, Bode et al. reported the pioneering
NHC-mediated ring opening of formylcyclopropanes to
give activated carboxylate esters that were trapped inter-
molecularly by alcohols or amines to afford the corre-
sponding esters and amides (eq 1).13 The groups of You
and Wang have then applied this chemistry to synthesize
heterocyclic compounds via intra- or intermolecular
trapping of the activated ester intermediates (eq 1).14 To
the best of our knowledge, no reaction through trapping of
the possible enolate intermediates A (eq 2) has been
developed.14d At first glance trapping the enolate inter-
mediates seemedtobedifficult especiallygiven the factthat
Our condition optimization for a model reaction be-
tween formylcyclopropane 1a and chalcone 2a is summar-
ized in Table 1. The reaction using 10 mol % of 4a NHC
precatalyst and 30 mol % DBU successfully afforded
product 3a with 68% yield but poor dr (Table 1, entry 1).
Additional studies revealed that the low dr was mainly
caused by the base (DBU)-induced postreaction epimer-
ization of 3a. Thus decreasing the DBU loading from 30 to
10 mol % led to a higher dr (14:1; Table 1, entry 2) without
loss of the yield. The use of a slight excess of aldehyde 1a
(1.2 to 1.5 equiv) was necessary to ensure high yields as
side reactions via the previously reported activated ester
intermediates14a could not be completely suppressed.
Further screenings of solvents and bases suggested that
the combination of DBU and THF gave the best results in
terms of both yields and stereoselectivities (Table 1, entries
3ꢀ8).The use of 4A molecular sieve could improve the
reaction yield but with a dropped dr (Table 1, entry 10).
Finally, switching the counteraꢀnions16 of the NHC pre-
cursors from Clꢀ (4a) to BF4 (4b) could consistently
afford the product with high yields and excellent enantios-
electivities (Table 1, entries 11ꢀ12).
(7) Jian, T.-Y.; Shao, P.-L.; Ye, S. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2381.
(8) The same type of highly activated heterodiene substrates were
also widely used in other catalytic hetero-DielsꢀAlder reactions. See: (a)
Juhl, K.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1498. (b)
Han, B.; He, Z.-Q.; Li, J.-L.; Li, R.; Jiang, K.; Liu, T.-Y.; Chen, Y.-C.
Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 5582–5589. (c) Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
58, 5474.
(9) For examples of NHC-bounded enolates involved in intramole-
cular DielsꢀAlder reactions (or possible Michael additions) with chal-
cones, see ref 5f and Fang, X.; Jiang, K.; Xing, C.; Hao, L.; Chi, Y. R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1910.
(10) For one example of guanidine-catalyzed intermolecular
DielsꢀAlder reactions with chalcones, see: Dong, S.; Liu, X.; Chen,
X.; Mei, F.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, B.; Lin, L.; Feng, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 10650. It should be noted that stepwise pathways via Michael-
type additions to chalcones followed by enol ester formatons cannot be
ruled out. So these (ref 5cꢀ5e, 6, 7, 10) and our reactions might be
considered as “formal” DielsꢀAlder reactions.
(11) (a) Rovis, T.; Reynolds, N. T.; Read de Alaniz, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 9518. (b) Rovis, T.; Vora, H. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 13796. (c) Bode, J. W.; Chow, K. Y.-K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
8126.
(12) (a) Nair, V.; Vellalath, S.; Poonoth, M.; Suresh, E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 8736. (b) Bode, J. W.; Chiang, P.-C.; Kaeobamrung, J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3520.
(13) (a) Bode, J. W.; Sohn, S. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45,
6021. (b) Bode, J. W.; Sohn, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13798. (c)
ꢀ
Vesely, J.; Zhao, G.-L.; Bartoszewicz, A.; Cordova, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
With the optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 12) in
hand, the scope of the chalcone substrates was examined
2008, 49, 4209.
(14) (a) You, S.-L.; Li, G.-Q.; Dai, L.-X. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1623. (b)
Du, D.; Li, L.; Wang, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4379. (c) Li, L.; Du, D.;
Ren, J.; Wang, Z. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2011, 614. (d) Du, D.; Wang,
Z. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 2008, 4949. In Wong’s work (ref 14d) the
formation of an ester intermediate (via trapping of the NHC-bounded
activated ester) was followed by an intramolecular condensation of the
ester with an aldehyde to form the product; no direct trapping of an
NHC-bounded enolate intermediate was observed/proposed.
(15) For a recent example of related intramolecular nucleophilic
addition to triazoliums in an NHC-catalyzed living polymerization,
see: Guo, L.; Zhang, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18072.
(16) For a discusion on counteranion effects, see: Wei, S.; Wei, X.-G.;
Su, X.; You, J.; Ren, Y. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 5965.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 19, 2011
5367