the photochromism of pyrazolones. The X-ray diffraction data have
proved that the E-form of 1a coverts into the K-form of 1b after
photochromic reaction.
of C]O groups. The relative amounts of the tautomers can be
estimated from the E-form/K-form isomer ratio of 62 : 38 for 1a
before irradiation. The E-form/K-form isomer ratio changed to
40 : 60 for 1b after UV irradiation. These results are consistent with
X-ray crystallographic analysis. The population of C]O increases
along with a decreasing of the C–O population after illumination
with UV light. The data indicate that the white E-form of 1a trans-
forms to the yellow K-form of 1b during the photochromic process.
The K-form exists appreciably in the crystalline state and increases in
population after UV light irradiation/heating.
ꢀ
Based on the existence of intramolecular [N4–H/O] (2.695(4) A,
ꢀ
0
ꢀ
ꢀ
156(3) ) and intermolecular [S/H–N2 ] (3.240(3) A, 172(4) )
hydrogen bonds (Fig. S4B, ESI†), we can find convenient channels
for transferring protons exist in the crystalline state of pyrazolones.
Firstly, an intermediate state thiol form 1a0 is established under UV
light irradiation (as shown in Scheme 1). The H on N4 atom transfers
to S atom by means of intramolecular rearrangement, forming
intermolecular [S–H/N20]. One proton subsequently transfers from
O atom to N4 atom by the channel of intramolecular [N4/H–O],
forming another intramolecular hydrogen bond [N4–H/O].
Another proton transfers from S atom to N20 atom by the channel of
intermolecular [S–H/N20] at the same time, and forms another
intermolecular hydrogen bond [S/H–N20]. The processes of intra-
and intermolecular proton transfer lead to enol–keto
photoisomerization.
In conclusion, direct observation of structure changes has strongly
proved the mechanism of photochromic reaction of pyrazolones in
single crystals. The length of the O–C7 bond of white products
ꢀ
becomes shorter than that of the yellow products by 0.014 A. Hence,
the X-ray diffraction can unambiguously and directly display the
occurrence of the tautomeric transformation between the E-form and
K-form isomers in single crystals of 1. The IR and XPS results of 1
before and after photo-irradiation are well consistent with those from
X-ray crystallographic analyses and further verify the mechanism of
photochromic pyrazolones. The photochromic reactions of pyr-
azolones are due to tautomerization between their E-form and
K-forms accompanied by proton transfer.
Photochromic reactions of pyrazolones have been further investi-
gated with IR and XPS spectra, which strongly support the mecha-
nism suggested: transformation from the E-form to the K-form
occurs in the materials after UV irradiation. The structure differences
between the E-form and the K-form of 1 result in IR and XPS spectra
changing clearly (Fig. 3). Under irradiation of 365 nm light, a new
sharp band attributed to C]O stretching vibration appears at 1671
cmꢁ1 in the IR spectrum of 1 for the formation of the K-form of 1b
along with a relative intensity increase of the band at 3220 cmꢁ1
(Fig. 3A). The band of 3220 cmꢁ1 can be ascribed to N2–H vibration
in the solid state. Ultraviolet irradiation can activate the trans-
formation of 1 from the E-form to the K-form. While IR spectros-
copy is a useful method to study the hydrogen bonded structure,14 it
cannot give definite structure change corresponding to the O–H
stretching band of 1. Because the binding energies in the XPS spectra
of materials are sensitive to the chemical environment perturbation,
the materials were also characterized with XPS for distinguishing the
tautormers.15 We have focused our efforts on examining the O1s
spectra changes for verifying the photochromic mechanism. The O1s
XPS spectra of 1 are shown in Fig. 3B, which can be decomposed into
two peaks by curve fitting. The O1s peaks at 531.8 and 532.3 eV can
be assigned to oxygen atoms of C–O groups, and the peaks corre-
sponding to binding energies of 529.6 and 530.3 eV to oxygen atoms
The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (20866009, 21062020 and 21071130), and the Natural Science
Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China
(2009211B02).
References
1 E. Hadjoudis and I. M. Mavridis, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2004, 33, 579–588;
K. Amimoto and T. Kawato, J. Photochem. Photobiol., C, 2005, 6,
207–226.
€
2 H. Durr, H. Bouas-Laurent, Photochromism: Molecules and Systems;
Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990; S. Kawata and
Y. Kawata, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1777–1788; C. C. Corredor,
Z. L. Huang and K. D. Belfield, Adv. Mater., 2006, 18, 2910–2914;
G. Y. Jiang, S. Wang, W. F. Yuan, L. Jiang, Y. L. Song, H. Tian
and D. B. Zhu, Chem. Mater., 2006, 18(2), 235–237.
3 Y. Yokoyama, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1717–1739; G. Berkovic, Chem.
€
Rev., 2000, 100, 1741–1753; C. Weber, F. Rustemeyer and H. Durr,
Adv. Mater., 1998, 10, 1348–1351; J. Areephong, T. Kudernac,
J. J. D. D. Jong, G. T. Carroll, D. Pantorott, J. Hjelm,
W. R. Browne and B. L. Feringa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
12850–12851; L. Y. Zhu, W. W. Wu, M. Q. Zhu, J. J. Han and
J. K. Hurst, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 3524–3526.
4 Y. Kishimoto and J. Abe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 4227–4229;
Y. Chen and D. X. Zeng, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 5037–5040;
R. Siewertsen, H. Neumann, B. Buchheim-Stehn, R. Herges,
C. Nather, F. Renth and F. Temps, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
15594–15595.
5 K. Uchida, M. Saito, A. Murakami, S. Nakamura and M. Irie, Adv.
Mater., 2003, 15, 121–125; T. Tsujioka, M. Kume and M. Irie, J.
Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1997, 104, 203–206; R. Pardo, M. Zayat
ꢁ
and D. Levy, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 6756–6760; R. Metivier,
ꢁ
ꢁ
S. Badre, R. Meallet-Renault, P. Yu, R. B. Pansu and K. Nakatani,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 11916–11926; S. Z. Xiao, Y. Zou,
M. X. Yu, T. Yi, Y. F. Zhou, F. Y. Li and C. H. Huang, Chem.
Commun., 2007, 4758–4760; D. Levy, Chem. Mater., 1997, 9, 2666–
2670; J. Whelan, J. T. C. Wojtyk and E. Buncel, Chem. Mater.,
2008, 20, 3797–3799.
6 M. Irie, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1685–1716; E. Hadjoudis and
I. Mavridis, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2004, 33, 579–588; K. Amimoto and
T. Kawato, J. Photochem. Photobiol., C, 2005, 6, 207–226;
T. Yamada, S. Kobatake, K. Muto and M. Irie, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2000, 122, 1589–1592; J. Harada, R. Nakajima and K. Ogawa, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 7085–7091; I. Yildiz, E. Deniz and
F. M. Raymo, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1859–1867.
Fig. 3 (A) FT-IR spectra and (B) O1s spectra (XPS) of 1 before and
after UV irradiation. The colored lines in (B) show the results of curve
fitting.
12204 | J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 12202–12205
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011