G. N. Karageorge, J. E. Macor / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 5117–5119
5119
Table 1 (continued)
Starting amine
Starting carbonyl
Product
Yield (time)
NH2
CH3
O
N
H
O
f
No desired product
(18 h)
N
H
O
H
N
HN
g
58% (18 h)
8a
8b
NH2
O
H
h
i
86% (18 h)
77% (18 h)
N
H
NH2
O
O
N
N
N
8c
8d
O
HN
HN
N
j
67% (18 h)
59% (18 h)
H
8e
k
H3CN
N
N
followed by reduction of the resulting nitroolefin 6 afforded indole
7. The key step in the synthesis was the thermal electrocyclic rear-
rangement of the propargyloxy group in 7 to form the pyrano func-
tionality in 8.3d Hydrogenation of 8 reduced both the olefin and the
with
methylene
chloride/methanol/ammonium
hydroxide
[9:1:0.1] to afford purified alkylated amine (2 or 8). Table 1 out-
lines the amines and carbonyl compounds used, the hydrogenation
times and yields. Reactions were typically run on 1 g scale of the
amine.
nitro group to afford gram quantities of racemic
a-methyltrypta-
mine 1 (Scheme 3).
The alkylated a-methyltryptamines (2a–d) prepared were
Treatment of 1 with excess ketone (a, b, c, and d, Table 1) under
Parr hydrogenation conditions (3 atm H2, 10% w/w of 10% Pd on
carbon in EtOH) afforded the desired alkylated amine 2 in moder-
ate yields (Table 1). Work-up typically was simple filtration, wash-
ing the Pd/C with ammonia in methanol, and, if necessary,
chromatography of the residue. Treatment of 1 with an excess of
aldehyde (e or f, Table 1) yielded complex mixtures, likely due to
interception of the in situ imine by C2 of the electron-rich indole
ring in a Pictet–Spengler reaction. Identification of the products
of these reactions was not pursued. In only one instance using ke-
tones (entry c) was the product of the Pictet–Spengler reaction ob-
tained/isolated.4
To expand the scope of this simple reductive amination, we
examined another primary amine (Table 1, entries h and i) and sec-
ondary amine (Table 1, entries g, j and k) using aldehydes (Table 1,
entries g, h, and j) and a ketone (i and k, Table 1). In all cases, Parr
hydrogenation conditions directly afforded the desired alkylated
amine, and the work-up involved simple filtration, washing with
1 N ammonia in methanol, removal of solvent to afford the desired
alkylated amine directly or after column chromatography.
A general Parr hydrogenation reductive amination procedure was
as follows: A mixture of amine (1 equiv), ketone or aldehyde (1–
2 equiv) was shaken under an atmosphere of hydrogen (3 atm)
with 10% by weight of 10% Pd/C in ethanol (20 mL/gram of 1) for
12–48 h, depending on the carbonyl compound used. After the
reaction was deemed to be complete (TLC or HPLC), the reaction
mixture was filtered through Celite Ò, washed with 1 N ammonia
in methanol, and the resulting filtrate was evaporated under re-
duced pressure. If the filtrate residue was not sufficiently pure
alkylated amine, then further purification was achieved by column
chromatography using silica gel (50 g/gram residue) and elution
tested for affinity across 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C receptors to
see if some selectivity could be achieved. Unfortunately, no selec-
tivity within the 5-HT2 receptor family subtypes was seen and this
approach was not pursued further.
In conclusion, reductive amination of primary and secondary
amines can be simply accomplished using Parr hydrogenation con-
ditions (3 atm H2 and 10% Pd on carbon) with reaction work-up of-
ten entailing only filtration and removal of solvent to afford the
desired alkylated amine in high yield and purity.
References and notes
1. May, J. A.; Chen, H.-H.; Rusinko, A.; Lynch, V. M.; Sharif, N. A.; McLaughlin, M. A.
J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4188.
2. Paul Rylander, L. Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic Syntheses; Academic Press:
New York, NY, 1979. pp.165-174.
3. (a) Macor, J. E.; Blank, D. H.; Post, R. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 45; (b) Macor, J.
E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7019; (c) Macor, J. E.; Langer, O. D.; Gougoutas, J. Z.;
Malley, M. F.; Cornelius, L. A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3541; (d) Karageorge,
G. N.; Macor, J. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1011.
4. The Pictet–Spengler cyclization product (9) was also obtained in 23% yield from
the reaction of 1 and cyclohexanone under the hydrogenation conditions.
CH3
O
NH
9
N
H