I. Kang et al. / Dyes and Pigments 92 (2011) 588e595
589
In this paper, we studied the highly twisted asymmetric 2-(2-
methylnaphthalene-)-9,10-di(naphthalene-2-yl)anthracene as a wide
energy gap host for blue OLEDs. Although the 9,10-di(naphthalene-
2-yl)lanthracene (ADN) and 2-(2-methylnaphthalene)-9,10-di(naph
thalene-2-yl)anthracene (MNAn) have been reported as host mate-
rials, the new host having ortho-methylated naphthalene on the 2-
position of the anthracene has increased charge transport ability
thickness of the film were measured with a quartz oscillator. OLED
performance was studied by measuring the currentevoltagee
luminescence (IeVeL) characteristics, EL, and PL spectra at room
temperature. IeVeL characteristics and CIE color coordinates were
measured with a Keithley SMU238 and Spectrascan PR650. EL
spectra of the devices were measured utilizing a diode array rapid
analyzer system (Professional Scientific Instrument Corp.) Fluores-
cence spectra of the solutions in chloroform were measured using
a spectro fluorimeter (Shimadzu Corp.).
due to increased p-electron density as well as a highly twisted struc-
ture, leading to excellent host behavior for blue OLEDs. We have
designed a new asymmetrical anthracene derivative, N-(4-(10-
naphthalene-2-yl)anthracene-9-yl)phenyl-N-phenylnaphthalene-
2-amine, as a dopant. Generally, arylamine groups increase the hole
transporting ability of the materials as well as reduce their crystal-
linity, improving device stability due to the amorphous structure,
increase efficiency due to charge balance and reduce energy
consumption due to reduced driving voltages [18]. Thus, anthracene
derivatives containing arylamine have been reported, however, the
reported compounds usually have a symmetrical structure because
of theirease ofsynthesis. Thesesymmetrically introduced arylamine
groups usually deteriorate color purity for blue emission [13].
Therefore, we designed an asymmetrical anthracene derivative with
an arylamine on the 9-position and naphthalene on the 10-position
of the anthracene unit, respectively. These well matched host-guest
materials can improve efficiency due to balanced energy levels and
morphological stability due to similar structure based on twisted
anthracene.
2.3. Synthesis of naphthalene-2-yl boronic acid (1)
2.5 M n-butyllithium (80 mL, 31.9 mmol) was slowly added to
2-bromonaphthalene (60 g, 29.0 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (THF)
(100 mL) at ꢂ78 ꢀC. The mixture was stirred for 30 min at ꢂ40 ꢀC.
Triethyl borate (127 g, 869.0 mmol) was slowly dropped into the
mixture and stirred at room temperature. After 12 h, the reaction
was terminated by the addition of 2 M HCl (200 mL) and extracted
with dichloromethane (300 mL). The crude product was purified by
recrystallization with hexane. Yield: 40 g (80%); mp. 268 ꢀC, 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): 8.37(s, 1H), 8.18(s, 2H), 7.95e7.83 (m,
4H), 7.55e7.48 (m, 2H).
2.4. Synthesis of 9-(naphthalene-2-yl)anthracene (2)
9-Bromoanthracene (15 g, 58 mmol) and naphthalene-2-yl
boronic acid (13 g, 76 mmol) was added in the mixture of
toluene (80 mL), K2CO3 (40 mL), THF (25 mL) and of tetrakis(-
triphenylphosphine) palladium (0) (0.27 g, 2 mol%). The solution
was stirred in N2 for 24 h at 110 ꢀC. After reaction, the mixture was
quenched with 2 NeHCl (400 mL). The crude product was extrac-
ted and dried. The purification was carried out by column chro-
matography with hexane. The product was purified by column
chromatography with hexane as eluent Yield: 11.8 g (67%); m.p.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
All starting materials were purchased from Aldrich and Strem.
All reagents purchased commercially were used without further
purification.
2.2. Instrument
154 ꢀC, 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm):
d
¼ 8.56 (s, 1H). 8.02e8.11
(m, 4H), 7.91e7.96 (d, 2H), 7.70e7.73 (d, 2H), 7.57w7.62 (m, 3H),
7.46e7.51 (m, 2H), 7.32e7.37 (m, 2H).
1H NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker Avance-300 MHz
FT-NMR spectrometer, and chemical shifts were reported in ppm
with tetramethylsilane as internal standard. FT-IR spectra were
recorded using a Bruker IFS66 spectrometer. Thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA) was performed under nitrogen using a TA instruments
2050 thermogravimetric analyzer. Differential scanning calorimeter
(DSC) was conducted under nitrogen using a TA instrument DSC Q10.
The both samples were heated using a 10 ꢀC/min. UV-visible spectra
and photoluminescence (PL) spectra were measured by Shimadsu
UV-1065PC UV-visible spectrophotometer and Perkin Elmer LS50B
fluorescence spectrophotometer, respectively. The electrochemical
properties of the materials were measured by cyclic voltammetry
(Epsilon C3) in a 0.1 M solution of tetrabutyl ammonium perchlorate
in acetonitrile. The organic EL devices were fabricated using succes-
sive vacuum-deposition of N,N0-diphenyl-N,N0-bis-[4-(phenyl-m-
2.5. Synthesis of 9-bromo-10-(naphthalene-2-yl)anthracene (3)
In the 500 mL flask, of 9-(naphthalene-2-yl)-anthracene (20 g,
66 mmol), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (30 mL) was stirred. N-
bromosuccinimide (20 g, 0.12 mmol) was slowly dropped. After
stirring for 7 h, water (700 mL) was added to the mixture. The crude
product was filtrated and washed with ethanol. Yield: 16.9 g (67%);
m.p. 173 ꢀC, 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): 8.64e8.67 (d, 2H),
8.02e8.08 (m, 2H), 7.92 (d, 2H), 7.52e7.69 (m, 7H), 7.34 (m, 2H).
2.6. Synthesis of 4,4,4,5-tetramethyl-2-(10-(naphthalene-2-yl)
anthracene-9-yl)-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (4)
0
0
ꢀ
ꢀ
tolylamino)-phenyl]-biphenyl-4,4 -diamine (DNTPD, 700 A), N,N -
0
0
0
diphenyl-N,N -di(1-napthyl)-1,1 -biphenyl-4,4 -diamine (NPD, 300 A),
9.10-di(naphthalene-2-yl)anthracene (ADN): p-NAPPN (3%): or
MNAn: p-NAPPN (3%), tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum (Alq3,
2.5 M n-butyllithium (50.9 mmol) was slowlyadded to 9-bromo-
10-(naphthalene-2-yl)anthracene (39.1 mmol) in THF (100 mL)
at ꢂ78 ꢀC. The mixture was stirred for 30 min at ꢂ40 ꢀC. 2-
Isopropoxy-4,4,5,5,-tetramethyl-[1, 2, 3] dioxaborolane (24 mL,
11.7 mmol) was slowly dropped into the mixture and stirred at room
temperature. After 12 h, the reaction was terminated by the addi-
tion of 2 M HCl and extracted with ethyl acetate. The crude product
was purified by column chromatography with hexane:ethyl acetate
ꢀ
ꢀ
400 A), LiF (5 A), and Al electrode on top of the ITO glass substrate.
The ITO glass with a sheet resistance of about 10 was etched for
U
the anode electrode pattern and cleaned in ultrasonic baths of iso-
propyl alcohol and acetone. The overlap area of Al and ITO elec-
trodes is about 4 mm2. A UV zone cleaner (Jeilight Company) was
used for further cleaning before vacuum deposition of the organic
materials. Vacuum deposition of the organic materials was carried
out under a pressure of 2 ꢁ10ꢂ7 torr. The deposition rate for organic
materials was about 0.1 nm/s. The evaporation rate and the
(10:1). Yield: 10 g (60.1%); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, ppm)
(d, 2H), 8.07e8.01 (m, 2H), 7.9 (d, 2H), 7.6 (d, 2H), 7.6e7.5 (m, 2H),
7.54e7.49 (m, 3H), 7.33e7.28 (m, 2H), 1.6 (s, 12H).
d
¼ 8.4