Despite this breakthrough, organocatalyzed R,R-bifunc-
tionalization of acetaldehyde with two different electro-
philes remains an untrodden process. As a part of our
ongoing research into organocatalyzed CꢀN bond
formation,5 we report herein a stereoselective one-pot
Mannich reaction/electrophilic amination of acetaldehyde
through double enamine catalysis (Scheme 1). This would
afford chiral R,β-diamino aldehydes which represent inter-
esting building blocks for the synthesis of vicinal diamine-
containing compounds.6
Dichloromethane and acetonitrile are good solvents for
R-amination of aldehydes using catalyst 2.5a,7,8 These were
tested in the Mannich reaction, and acetonitrile turned out
to be the best solvent affording 3 in 84% yield and 98% ee
(entries 5 and 6).
Table 1. Optimization of the Mannich Reactiona
Scheme 1. One-Pot R,R-Bifunctionalization of Acetaldehyde
entry
PG
solvent
yield (%)b
ee (%)c
1
Boc
Cbz
Bz
THF
n.r.
n.r.
68
n.d.
n.d.
98
2
THF
The successful implementation of a one-pot trans-
formation in a sequential approach requires the opti-
mization of the first step to make it compatible with the
subsequent ones. With this aim in mind, the first step
has to fulfill several criteria: (i) A quasi-equimolar ratio
of reagents is required. An excess of one substrate
might inhibit the subsequent reaction. (ii) The reaction
has to proceed in high yield without the formation of
any side products which could influence the following
transformation. (iii) Reaction conditions must be com-
patible with each transformation. Based on the recent
work of Hayashi et al.3e on the reaction of N-benzoyl-
N-benzylideneamine (1 equiv) with acetaldehyde
(5 equiv) catalyzed by the system diarylprolinol silyl ether
2/p-nitrobenzoic acid, we first embarked upon optimiza-
tion of the first step (Table 1). The reaction of acetaldehyde
(1.5 equiv) with N-protected-N-benzylideneamine 1a
(1 equiv) was chosen as the model reaction. Under these
conditions, N-Boc- and N-Cbz-N-benzylideneamines 1a
failed to react withacetaldehyde (entries 1 and 2). Reaction
of acetaldehyde with N-Bz imine 1a led to the desired
alcohol 3 in 68% yield and 98% ee after in situ reduction
(entry 3). It is worthwhile noting that decreasing the
amount of acetaldehyde only slightly affects the yield while
maintaining high enantioselectivity (entries 3 and 4).
3
THF
4d
5
Bz
THF
76
97
Bz
CH2Cl2
MeCN
60
82
6
Bz
84
98
a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were run with N-PG imine 1a (0.3
mmol), acetaldehyde (0.45 mmol) in solvent at 0 °C for 16 h. b Yield of
isolated product. c Determined by chiral HPLC analysis. d Reaction
carried out with 5 equiv of acetaldehyde.
With the optimized conditions for the Mannich reaction
in hand, we then turned our attention on the R-amination
step as part of a one-pot procedure (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. R,R-Bifunctionalization of Acetaldehyde by
Sequential Addition of Reagents
The one-pot procedure consists of the reaction of acet-
aldehyde (1.5 equiv) with N-Bz imine 1a (1 equiv) catalyzed
by 10 mol % of 2/p-NO2C6H4CO2H. The reaction was
stirred at 0 °C for 16 h, at which point 1.5 equiv of di-tert-
butylazodicarboxylate was added. Monitoring of the reac-
tion showed that electrophilic amination did not occur at
0 °C under these conditions. Raising the temperature to
room temperature and further stirring for 24 h led to the
formation of 4a in 54% yield as a separable mixture of two
diastereoisomers (syn/anti = 90.5/9.5) after in situ reduction
and purification on silica gel. The above results prompted us
to investigate a procedure whereby all the reagents would be
present at the beginning of the reaction and a simple change
of temperature from 0 °C to room temperature would
promote electrophilic amination. Under these conditions,
reaction of 1a, di-tert-butylazodicarboxylate, and acetalde-
hyde for 16 h at 0 °C followed by further stirring at room
(5) For recent articles, see: (a) Ait-Youcef, R.; Sbargoud, K.;
Moreau, X.; Greck, C. Synlett 2009, 3007. (b) Kalch, D.; Ait-Youcef,
R.; Moreau, X.; Thomassigny, C.; Greck, C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2010, 21, 2302. (c) Ait-Youcef, R.; Moreau, X.; Greck, C. J. Org. Chem.
2010, 75, 5312. (d) Desmarchelier, A.; Marrot, J.; Moreau, X.; Greck, C.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 994. (e) Desmarchelier, A.; Yalgin, H.;
Coeffard, V.; Moreau, X.; Greck, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 4430.
(6) For reviews, see: (a) Lucet, D.; Gall, T. L.; Mioskowski, C.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2580. (b) Saibabu Kotti, S. R. S.;
Timmons, C.; Li, G. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2006, 67, 101. (c) Kizirian,
J. C. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 140.
(7) For seminal reports on organocatalyzed R-amination of alde-
hydes, see: (a) List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5656. (b) Bøgevig, A.;
Juhl, K.; Kumaragurubaran, N.; Zhuang, W.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1790.
(8) For relevant reviews on organocatalyzed R-amination, see: (a)
Greck, C.; Drouillat, B.; Thomassigny, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 1377.
(b) Janey, J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4292. (c) Guillena, G.;
ꢀ
Ramon, D. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 1465. (d) Vilaivan, T.;
Bhanthumnavin, W. Molecules 2010, 15, 917.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 21, 2011
5779