A. Iwan et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 151 (2010) 30–38
31
(CDCl3) containing TMS as an internal standard were used as solvent.
FTIR spectra of the compounds were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
paragon 500 spectrometer (wavenumber range: 400–4000 cm−1; reso-
lution: 2 cm− 1). Current–voltage measurements were performed on
ITO/compound/Alq3/Al device. The azomethine solution (1 w/v%
in dichloroethane) was spin-cast onto ITO-covered glass substrate at
room temperature. Residual solvent was removed by heating the film
in a vacuum. Alq3 layer was prepared on the polymer film surface by
vacuum deposition at a pressure of 10− 6 Torr and then Al electrode
was vacuum deposited at the same pressure. The area of the diodes
was 9 mm2. Current–voltage characteristics were detected using
electromether Keithey 6715.
(4): Yield: 82%. FTIR: νmax in cm−1 2881, 2825, 1636 (HC=N–), 1597,
1558, 1516, 1488, 1445, 1403, 1361, 1313, 1299, 1286, 1236,
1149, 1145, 1074, 1007, 946, 889, 821, 762, 736, 723, and 963. 1H
NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, TMS) [ppm]: δ 8.57 (s, 1H, HC=N–); 8.02,
7.99, 7.93, 7.91, 7.90, 7.87, 7.74, 7.71, 7.68, 7.67, 7.65, 7.48, 7.47,
7.45, 7.41, 7.36, 7.33, 7.25, 6.78, 6.75, 3.09, 3.03, 2.91, 2.80, and
1.57 (H2O from CDCl3), (as in Fig. 2). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3,
TMS) [ppm]: δ 159.72 (–HC=N–), 131.96, 130.72, 124.82,
124.10, 123.25, 121.53, 114.72, and 111.53.
3. Results and discussion
The phase transitions and mesogenicity were studied by differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarizing microscope observations
(POM). DSC were measured on a TA-DSC 2010 apparatus using sealed
aluminium pans under nitrogen atmosphere at a heating/cooling
rate 0.5 °C/min in a temperature range from −20 °C to over the clearing
point.
The textures of the liquid-crystalline phase were observed with a
Polarized Optical Microscopy (POM), set-up composed of: i) LEICA
DMLM Microscope (magnification: 2.5×, 5×, 10×, 20× and 50×)
working in both transmission and reflexion modes, ii) LINKAM LTS350
(−196 °C till +350 °C) Hot plate and LINKAM CI94 temperature
controller, and iii) JVC Numeric 3-CCD KYF75 camera (resolution:
1360×1024).
3.1. Synthesis and characterization
Azomethines described in this paper were prepared from 4-biphenyl
carboxaldehyde and four amines via high temperature solution
condensation in N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) at 160 °C. Chemical
structures of the azomethines (abbreviated hereinafter as (1)–(4)) are
presented in Fig. 1.
3.2. NMR study
Their expected chemical constitution is confirmed by spectroscopic
studies. In the Experimental section NMR data concerning all imines
investigated are collected. In particular the signals in the range of 159–
161 ppm, present in the 13C NMR spectra of all compounds, confirm the
existence of the azomethine group carbon atoms. The changes in the
chemical shift, observed upon the modification of the chemical
constitution of the amine originating sub-unit are clearly observed.
For example, in the case of (3), the presence of fluoro atoms in the chain
results in an up-field shift of the line related to the azomethine carbon
atom in comparison with another azomethines. On the other hand, the
presence of azo group (4) induces an up-field shift of the line related to
the azomethine carbon atom in comparison with (3) and results in a
very small down-field shift of the line related to the azomethine carbon
atom in comparison with (1) and (2).
2.3. General synthetic procedure of (1)–(4)
A mixture of aldehyde (1.0 mmol) and amine (1.0 mmol) in N,N-
dimethylacetamide (DMA) solution, with the presence of p-toluenesul-
fonic acid (PTS) (0.06 g) was refluxed with stirring for 10 h. The reaction
was conducted in an argon atmosphere and the condenser was fitted with
a Dean-stark trap. After cooling, the mixture was precipitated with 100 ml
of ethanol. The crude product was washed with methanol (500 ml) and
next with acetone (350 ml) to remove the unreacted monomers. Then
the compound was dried at 60 °C under vacuum for 12 h.
Most signals were assigned based on well-known proton NMR
chemical shift displacements resulting from electron shielding/
deshielding of the hydrogen nuclei by the inductive effects or from
the diamagnetic anisotropy of various neighboring groups. In the Ex-
perimental section 1H NMR data concerning all compounds were
investigated while in Fig. 2a 1H NMR spectra of the imines are present.
In particular in proton NMR spectra of the investigated compounds
the azomethine proton signal was observed in the range of 8.48–
8.57 ppm as it was expected (Fig. 2). For example, in the imine (4) the
signal from the imine group at 8.57 ppm was observed and was down-
field shift in comparison with another compounds. On the other hand
the presence of the azo group in (3) caused significant up-field shift of
the imine proton signals to 8.48 ppm with respect of the line related
to imine proton in comparison with another azomethines (see Ex-
perimental section). No chemical shift of the imine group proton and
carbon was observed along with an increase in length of the aliphatic
chain from 10 to 16 (compare (1) and (2)).
(1): Yield: 90%. FTIR: νmax in cm−1 3031, 2960, 2954, 2918, 2849,
1623 (HC=N–), 1599, 1580, 1559, 1502, 1486, 1467, 1450,
1406, 1363, 1312, 1210, 1179, 1115, 1006, 973, 889, 834, 819,
759, 719, 687, 558, and 533. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, TMS)
[ppm]: δ 8.52 (s, 1H, HC=N–); 7.98, 7.95, 7.72, 7.69, 7.67, 7.66,
7.64, 7.47, 7.45, 7.23, 7.21, 7.19, 2.63, 1.63, 1.61, 1.56 (H2O from
CDCl3), 1.27, and 0.88 (as in Fig. 2). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3,
TMS) [ppm]: δ 159.06 (–HC=N–), 140.99, 129.16, 129.11,
128.87, 127.84, 127.41, 127.16, 120.81, 35.51, 31.89, 31.54,
29.61, 29.51, 29.32, 22.67, and 14.10.
(2): Yield: 92%. FTIR: νmax in cm−1 3031, 2954, 2917, 2849, 1624
(HC=N–), 1599, 1580, 1560, 1502, 1465, 1450, 1407, 1364, 1312,
1169, 1115, 1006, 973, 889, 834, 759, and 719. 1H NMR (200 MHz,
CDCl3, TMS) [ppm]: δ 8.52 (s, 1H, HC=N–); 7.98, 7.95, 7.72, 7.69,
7.67, 7.66, 7.64, 7.49, 7.47, 7.45, 7.26, 7.23, 7.21, 7.19, 2.63, 1.59
(H2O from CDCl3), 1.26, and 0.88 (as in Fig. 2). 13C NMR (50 MHz,
CDCl3, TMS) [ppm]: δ 159.09 (–HC=N–), 149.58, 143.85, 141.00,
140.31, 135.31, 130.28, 129.16, 129.12, 129.01, 128.87, 128.46,
127.85, 127.69, 127.41, 127.16, 120.82, 35.51, 35.07, 31.92, 31.83,
31.56, 29.69, 29.60, 29.52, 29.36, 29.31, 22.68, and 14.13.
(3): Yield: 89%. FTIR: νmax in cm−1 3030, 2875, 1628 (HC=N–),
1600, 1505, 1450, 1415, 1370, 1300, 1201, 1172, 1153, 1136,
1104, 1093, 1048, 979, 918, 886, 848, 766, 723, 699, 653, 562,
and 529. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, TMS) [ppm]: δ 8.48 (s, 1H,
HC=N–); 8.01, 7.97, 7.75, 7.72, 7.68, 7.67, 7.65, 7.64, 7.63, 7.61,
7.31, 7.28, 7.26, and 1.57 (H2O from CDCl3), (as in Fig. 2). 13C
NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3, TMS) [ppm]: δ 161.64 (–HC=N–),
156.28, 144.34, 140.79, 134.60, 129.56, 128.94, 128.07,
127.55, 127.20, and 120.96.
3.3. FTIR study
The presence of the imine group was also confirmed by FTIR
spectroscopy since in each case the band characteristic of the HC=N–
stretching deformations was detected. The exact position of this band
varies in the spectral range 1624–1636 cm−1 shifting towards higher
wavenumbers for the compound with the azo group in the structure.
Particular bands appearing in FTIR spectra of the imines investigated are
shown in the Experimental section. In addition to the –HC=N– stretching
band, a band in the range 1597–1600 cm−1 can be distinguished to the
C=C stretching deformations in the aromatic ring. As an example FTIR
spectra of (1) and (3) are shown in Fig. 2b. Absorption at shorter