Journal of the American Chemical Society
COMMUNICATION
National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation
grant (DBI-0923133) for instrumentation support.
’ REFERENCES
(1) Fernandez-Suarez, M.; Ting, A. Y. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008,
9, 929.
(2) Folling, J.; Belov, V.; Kunetsky, R.; Medda, R.; Schonle, A.;
Egner, A.; Eggeling, C.; Bossi, M.; Hell, S. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2007, 46, 6266.
(3) Krafft, G. A.; Sutton, W. R.; Cummings, R. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 301.
(4) Zhao, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Dakin, K.; Xu, K.; Martinez, M. L.; Li, W. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4653.
(5) Gee, K. R.; Weinberg, E. S.; Kozlowski, D. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2001, 11, 2181.
(6) Zheng, G.; Guo, Y. M.; Li, W. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 10616.
(7) Maurel, D.; Banala, S.; Laroche, T.; Johnsson, K. ACS Chem. Biol.
2010, 5, 507.
(8) Hu, D.; Tian, Z.; Wu, W.; Wan, W.; Li, A. D. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 15279.
Figure 4. Spatially controlled photoactivation of taxoidÀtetrazole 1 in
CHO cells. Cells were treated with 10 μM taxoidÀtetrazole 1 for 30 min
and then washed three times with prewarmed PBS. Cells in the red rectangle
area were exposed to 405-nm laser at 30 mW for 11 s followed by
fluorescence acquisition, λex = 405 nm. For confocal micrographs, scale
bar = 20 μm. For the plot, the fluorescence intensities from the cytosols of all
the activated cells inside the red rectangle area were quantified using ImageJ
program and compared to those of the unactivated cells.
(9) Keating, A. E.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. In Organic and Inorganic
Photochemistry; Ramamurthy, V., Schanze, K., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New
York, 1998; Vol. 2; pp 195À248 and references therein.
(10) Betzig, E.; Patterson, G. H.; Sougrat, R.; Lindwasser, O. W.;
Olenych, S.; Bonifacino, J. S.; Davidson, M. W.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J.;
Hess, H. F. Science 2006, 313, 1642.
(11) Rust, M. J.; Bates, M.; Zhuang, X. Nat. Methods 2006, 3, 793.
(12) Lee, H. L.; Lord, S. J.; Iwanaga, S.; Zhan, K.; Xie, H.; Williams,
J. C.; Wang, H.; Bowman, G. R.; Goley, E. D.; Shapiro, L.; Twieg, R. J.;
Rao, J.; Moerner, W. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15099.
(13) (a) Song, W.; Wang, Y.; Qu, J.; Lin, Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 9654. (b) Wang, Y.; Song, W.; Hu, W. J.; Lin, Q. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 5330. (c) Song, W.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Vera, C. I.; Qu, J.;
Lin, Q. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010, 5, 875. (d) Song, W.; Yu, Z.; Madden,
M. M.; Lin, Q. Mol. BioSyst. 2010, 6, 1576.
(14) Desai, A.; Mitchison, T. J. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1997, 13, 83.
(15) (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Dai, W. M.; Guy, R. K. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1994, 33, 15. (b) Yvon, A. M. C.; Wadsworth, P.; Jordan, M. A. Mol.
Biol. Cell 1999, 10, 947.
(16) (a) Souto, A. A.; Acu~na, U.; Andreu, J. M.; Barasoain, I.; Abal,
M.; Amat-Guerri, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 2710. (b) Díaz, J. F.;
Strobe, R.; Engelborghs, Y.; Souto, A. A.; Andreu, J. M. J. Biol. Chem.
2000, 275, 26265.
the intramolecular photoclick reaction under the 302 nm photo-
irradiation in ACN/PBS buffer (1:1). Two taxoidÀtetrazoles
with short linkers, 1 and 3, showed extremely fast photoinduced
cycloaddition inside living cells (in seconds), producing strong
pyrazoline fluorescent probes in situ for cytosolic microtubules.
Moreover, 1 can be activated using 405 nm laser as the photo-
activation light source, enabling a spatially controlled fluorescent
labeling of microtubules in living cells. Compared to the photo-
uncaging approach, this photoclick chemistry based approach
produces N2 as the only side product, which is nontoxic to cells.
Also, the fluorescent properties of the resulting pyrazoline fluor-
ophores are highly tunable,22 for example, through the appendage of
other alkene dipolarophiles. By employing a ‘scaffold hopping’
strategy23 we reported recently, it should be possible to further
improve the photoactivation efficiency, for example, by increasing
absorption at 405 nm through the use of other aromatic scaffolds,
and obtain turn-on pyrazoline fluorophores with increased
brightness and photostability.
(17) Guy, R. K.; Scott, Z. A.; Sloboda, R. D.; Nicolaou, K. C. Chem.
Biol. 1996, 3, 1021.
(18) Light energy was measured by placing a FieldMaster GS energy
analyzer equipped with LM-10 HTD power meter sensor 2-cm away
from the lamp.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
(19) Wang, Y.; Hu, W. J.; Song, W.; Lim, R. K. V.; Lin, Q. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 3725.
(20) (a) Du, H.; Fuh, R. C. A.; Li, J.; Corkan, L. A.; Lindsey, J. S.
Photochem. Photobiol. 1998, 68, 141. (b) Hard, T.; Fan, P.; Kearns, D. R.
Photochem. Photobiol. 1990, 51, 77.
S
Supporting Information. Supplemental figures, synthetic
b
schemes and experimental procedures, confocal micrographs,
and characterization of all compounds. This material is available
(21) Mullins, R. D. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2010,
2, a003392.
(22) Fahrni, C. J.; Yang, L.; Van Derveer, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 3799.
(23) Yu, Z.; Ho, L. Y.; Wang, Z.; Lin, Q. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.04.087.
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
qinglin@buffalo.edu
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We gratefully acknowledge the NIH (R01 GM 085092) for
financial support, Alan Siegel at the SUNY Buffalo Biological
Sciences Imaging Facility for assistance in microscopy, and the
11915
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja204758c |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11912–11915