6752
T.-C. Lin et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 6748–6753
lar nature of its emissive excited-state. On the other hand, the ini-
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
(a)
tial results from nonlinear transmission and photo-excitation
experiments in the nanosecond regime have indicated that this
multi-polar fluorophore manifests wide-dispersed two-photon
activities in the near IR-region and this feature may be beneficial
for various photonic and biophotonic applications such as effective
broad-band optical limiting and frequency up-conversion.
Acknowledgment
compound 1
compound 2
compound 3
We thank National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan for the finan-
cial support.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000
Wavelength (nm)
2.0
References and notes
(b)
compound 1@800nm
compound 2@720nm
compound 3@720nm
1.8
1. Göppert-Mayer, M. Ann. Phys. 1931, 9, 273–295.
2. Kaiser, W.; Garret, C. G. B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1961, 7, 229–231.
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
3. (a) Pawlicki, M.; Collins, H. A.; Denning, R. G.; Anderson, H. L. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 3244–3266; (b) Rumi, M.; Barlow, S.; Wang, J.; Perry, J. W.;
Marder, S. R. Adv. Polym. Sci. (Photoresponsive Polym. I) 2008, 213, 1–95; (c)
Belfield, K. D.; Yao, S.; Bondar, M. V. Adv. Polym. Sci. (Photoresponsive Polym. I)
2008, 213, 97–156; (d) Spangler, C. W. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 2013–2020; (e)
He, G. S.; Tan, L.-S.; Zheng, Q.; Prasad, P. N. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1245–1330; (f)
Lin, T.-C.; Chung, S.-J.; Kim, K.-S.; Wang, X.; He, G. S.; Swiatkiewicz, J.; Pudavar,
H. E.; Prasad, P. N. Adv. Polym. Sci. (Polym. Photonics Appl. II) 2003, 161, 157–193.
4. (a) Porres, L.; Katan, C.; Mongin, O.; Pons, T.; Mertz, J.; Blanchard-Desce, M. J.
Mol. Struct. 2004, 704, 17–24; (b) Porres, L.; Mongin, O.; Katan, C.; Charlot, M.;
Pons, T.; Mertz, J.; Blanchard-Desce, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 47–50; (c) Katan, C.;
Terenziani, F.; Mongin, O.; Werts, M. H. V.; Porres, L.; Pons, T.; Mertz, J.; Tretiak,
S.; Blanchard-Desce, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 3024–3037; (d) Terenziani,
F.; Droumaguet, C. L.; Katan, C.; Mongin, O.; Blanchard-Desce, M.
ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 723–734.
5. (a) Drobizhev, M.; Karotki, A.; Rebane, A.; Spangler, C. W. Opt. Lett. 2001, 26,
1081–1083; (b) Drobizhev, M.; Karotki, A.; Dzenis, Y.; Rebane, A.; Suo, Z.;
Spangler, C. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 7540–7543; (c) Drobizhev, M.;
Rebanea, A.; Suoc, Z.; Spangler, C. W. J. Luminescence 2005, 111, 291–305; (d)
Drobizhev, M.; Meng, F.; Rebane, A.; Stepanenko, Y.; Nickel, E.; Spangler, C. W. J.
Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 9802–9814; (e) Suo, Z.; Drobizhev, M.; Spangler, C. W.;
Christensson, N.; Rebane, A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4807–4810.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Input energy (mJ)
Figure 4. (a) Measured transmission spectra based on 1-cm path solution samples
of the studied compounds in THF at 0.02 M. The energy of the input laser pulses was
controlled at ꢀ1 mJ for every data point; (b) Measured optical-power-attenuation
curves at wavelengths with best power-limiting performance based on the same
sample solutions.
6. Yao, S.; Belfield, K. D. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5126–5132.
7. (a) Wang, Y.; He, G. S.; Prasad, P. N.; Goodson, T., III J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
10128–10129; (b) Bhaskar, A.; Ramakrishna, G.; Lu, Z.; Twieg, R.; Hales, J. M.;
Hagan, D. J.; Stryland, E. V.; Goodson, T., III J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11840–
11849; (c) Varnavski, O.; Yan, X.; Mongin, O.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Goodson, T.,
III J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 149–162.
1x106
8. (a) Chung, S.-J.; Kim, K.-S.; Lin, T.-C.; He, G. S.; Swiatkiewicz, J.; Prasad, P. N. J.
Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 10741–10745; (b) Kannan, R.; He, G. S.; Lin, T.-C.;
Prasad, P. N.; Vaia, R. A.; Tan, L.-S. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 185–194; (c) Lin, T.-C.;
He, G. S.; Prasad, P. N.; Tan, L.-S. J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 982–991; (d) Lin, T.-C.;
He, G. S.; Zheng, Q.; Prasad, P. N. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 2490–2498; (e) Lin,
T.-C.; Zheng, Q.; Chen, C.-Y.; He, G. S.; Huang, W.-J.; Ryasnyanskiy, A. I.; Prasad,
P. N. Chem. Commun. 2008, 389–391; (f) Lin, T.-C.; Hsu, C.-S.; Hu, C.-L.; Chen, Y.-
F.; Huang, W.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 182–185; (g) Lin, T.-C.; Chen, Y.-F.;
Hu, C.-L.; Hsu, C.-S. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 7075–7080; (h) Lin, T.-C.; Huang,
Y.-J.; Chen, Y.-F.; Hu, C.-L. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 1375–1382; (i) Lin, T.-C.; Lin,
W.-L.; Wang, C.-M.; Fu, C.-W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 912–921; (j) Zheng, Q.; He,
G. S.; Prasad, P. N. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6004–6011.
9. (a) Kleinschmidt, J.; Rentsch, S.; Tottleben, W.; Wilhelmi, B. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1974, 24, 133–135; (b) Ehrlich, J. B.; Wu, X. L.; Lee, I.-Y. S.; Hu, Z.-Y.; Rockel, H.;
Marder, S. R.; Perry, J. W. Opt. Lett. 1997, 22, 1843–1845; (c) Guha, S.; Kang, P.;
Porter, J. F.; Roach, D. E.; Remy, F. J. A.; Rao, D. V. G. L. N. Opt. Lett. 1992, 17, 264–
266; (d) Oulianov, D. A.; Tomov, I. V.; Dvornikov, A. S.; Rentzepis, P. M. Opt.
Commun. 2001, 191, 235–243; (e) Swiatkiewicz, J.; Prasad, P. N.; Reinhardt, B. A.
Opt. Commun. 1998, 157, 135–138; (f) Sutherland, R. L.; Brant, M. C.; Heinrichs,
J.; Rogers, J. E.; Slagle, J. E.; McLean, D. G.; Fleitz, P. A. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2005, 22,
1939–1948; (g) Gu, B.; Lou, K.; Wang, H.-T.; Ji, W. Opt. Lett. 2010, 35, 417–419.
10. Hong, Y.; Lama, J. W. Y.; Tang, B. Z. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4332–4353.
11. (a) Wang, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, D.; Tang, B. Z. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20,
1858–1867; (b) Liu, Y.; Deng, C.; Tang, L.; Qin, A.; Hu, R.; Sun, J. Z.; Tang, B. Z. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 660–663.
9x105
8x105
7x105
6x105
5x105
4x105
3x105
2x105
compound 1
compound 2
compound 3
1x105
0
600 640 680 720 760 800 840 880 920 960 1000
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 5. Measured photo-excitation spectra of compounds 1–3 by 2PEF method in
THF solution at 1 ꢁ 10ꢂ4 M using nanosecond laser pulses as the probe (with
experimental error ꢀ 15%).
12. (a) Ito, A.; Nakano, Y.; Katob, T.; Tanaka, K. Chem. Commun. 2005, 403–405; (b)
Mori, T.; Inoue, Y. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 2728–2740.
13. In all cases, the absorption peaks with the lowest energy were selected for the
quantum yields, and life-times of this chromophore were found to
be strongly dependent on the solvent polarity, suggesting the dipo-
presentation of Figure 3. Orꢂie1ntation polarizability (
Df) was calculated based
e
n2ꢂ1
on the equation of
D
f ¼ ½ þ1 ꢂ þ1ꢃusing a ‘rule of mixtures’ approach to
2n2
2
e