internal diketopiperazines (DKPs).6 Moreover, the lack of
commercial availability for these NMe-amino acids means
that there is a requirement for in situ methylation. Thus,
the strategies reported here for the synthesis of NMe-
IB-01212 could be extrapolated to the synthesis of other
highly methylated peptides.
The synthesis of the natural IB-01212 was accomplished
via a 3 þ 3 fragment coupling on solid-phase through ester
formation because the linear strategy gave very low yields
due to the instability of the ester bond.7
Figure 2. Starting points for the synthesis of NMe-IB-01212.
each starting point (Figure 2b,c) led to substantial degrees
of epimerization,11 thereby making it impossible to con-
tinue in this direction (see the Supporting Information).
In contrast, the successful strategy to reach NMe-IB-
01212 is depicted in Scheme 1, and it involves a com-
pletely stepwise approach. The starting point for the syn-
thesis was the Fmoc-NMe-Phe-OH residue, which was
anchored onto 2-CTC resin (3). Here, we have faced the
challenge of coupling Fmoc-NMe-Leu-OH as the second
amino acid.12 In a first attempt using 1- [bis(dimethylamino)-
methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo-[4,5-b]pyridinium hexafluoro-
phosphate 3-oxide (HATU), 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole
(HOAt), and diisopropylethylamine (DIEA) in DMF as
coupling reagent, significant deletion was observed, reaching
40%.13 DKP formation was also detected. To further opti-
mize the preparation of the initial tripeptide, several changes
were introduced: the synthesis was performed on 2-CTC
resin, but the loading was lowered to ca. 0.5 mmol/g in order
to favor coupling of NMe-Leu; second, the less-hindered
Alloc-NMe-Leu-OH was used with the double objective of
facilitating the coupling and simultaneously preventing DKP
formation due to the rather neutral conditions to remove the
Alloc group; and finally, the coupling system used was
changed to (1-cyano-2-ethoxy-2-oxoethylidenaminooxy) di-
methylamino-morpholino-carbenium hexafluorophosphate
Figure 1. Structure of natural IB-01212 and NMe-IB-01212.
For the synthesis of NMe-IB-01212, as no clear point for
cyclization exists (no Gly or Pro at the C-terminus is present,
for example, that would avoid epimerization), the three dif-
ferent options were initially studied (Figure 2).
Strategy (a) was not pursued because we had previously
observed that N-methylation of the side chain of the Dap
residue, when it is directly anchored to the 2-chlorotrityl
(2-CTC) resin,8 results in a severe loss of peptide.4 Strategy
(b) has the advantage that the 6-membered ring DKP can-
not be formed because the second residue, Dap, is elongated
through its side chain; but, on the other hand, the cycliza-
tion between the bulky NMe-Phe and the β-branched
NMe-Leu residue may prove complicated. In strategy (c),
NMe-Phe has the drawback of DKP formation due to the
consecutive NMe-amino acids, which was already observed
during the earlier synthesis of natural IB-01212.9
The first attempts at preparing NMe-IB-01212 entaileda
fragment approach10 to avoid a double solid-phase N-meth-
ylation step, which could affect the purity of the final chain,
and to circumvent the coupling of so many consecutive
NMe-amino acids. Nevertheless, fragment couplings at
~
(7) Cruz, L. J.; Cuevas, C.; Canedo, L. M.; Giralt, E.; Albericio, F.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3339.
(11) With NMe-Leu (b) at the C-terminus, the epimerization ratio
was 50:50, whereas with NMe-Leu (c) at the same position, the ratio was
65:35.
(12) In previous work with the 2-CTC resin, which contains bulky
trityl groups, we observed that when the first amino acid coupled to the
resin is sterically hindered, the coupling of the second amino acid is very
difficult.
(13) To test a less hindered solid support, the same tripeptide was
elongated on Wang resin; however, the deletion of NMe-Leu was still
present. Moreover and as expected, a greater amount of DKP was
formed.
(8) Barlos, K.; Gatos, D.; Kallitsis, J.; Papaphotiu, G.; Sotiriu, P.;
Yao, W.; Schaefer, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 3943.
(9) Although our group (Chiva, C.; Vilaseca, M.; Giralt, E.
Albericio, F. J. Peptide Sci. 1999, 5, 131.) and others (Rovero, P.;
Vigano, S.; Pegoraro, S.; Quartara, L. Lett. Peptide Sci. 1996, 2, 319.)
have shown that CTC resins avoid DKP formation during synthesis of
C-terminal Pro peptides, CTC resin can not prevent DKP formation in
sequences that are highly prone to this side reaction.
(10) The tripeptide, which constitutes half of the molecule, was
assembled on solid-phase. At this point, one-third of the resin-bound
peptide was deprotected, and the remaining two-thirds was cleaved from
the resin. After lyophilization, the 3 þ 3 fragment coupling was carried
out on solid phase.
ꢀ
(14) Subiros-Funosas, R.; Prohens, R.; Barbas, R.; El-Faham, A.;
Albericio, F. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 9394.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 2, 2012
613