(Table 1, entry 1). Cationic gold(I) catalysts have been
shown to be excellent catalysts for chromene formation.18
The Echavarren group has reported the stable gold(I)
catalyst A19,20 (Table 1), which does not need a cocatalyst
due to weak coordination of an acetonitrile ligand,
whereas catalysts B and C need to be activated by a
cocatalyst (typically a silver salt) to generate the active
catalytic species. In the present work, conversion of 8 to 9
proceeded in good yield using all three gold catalysts AꢀC
(Table 1, entries 2ꢀ4). Olefin 9 was then hydrogenated
over Adam’s catalyst (PtO2), and subsequent reduction of
the methyl ester with LiAlH4 afforded alcohol 10.
with NBS and dibenzoyl peroxide (BPO) successfully
resulted in the direct formation of the tricyclic chromane
11 in 50% yield without any Norrish type I fragmentation
product 12 observed.
Scheme 3. Radical Cyclization of Alcohol 14
Table 1. Metal-Catalyzed Intramolecular Hydroarylationa
With tricyclic bromide 11 in hand, the late-stage carbo-
nylation was next attempted. Neither lithiumꢀhalogen
exchange nor Grignard-based halogenꢀmetal exchange
followed by introduction of carbon dioxide or Mander’s
reagent (NCCO2Me) led to formation of the desired
product.24ꢀ26 Palladium catalyzed carbonylation of bro-
mide 11 in a 2:1 mixture of DMF/MeOH in the presence of
entry
cat.
conditions
9, yield (%)
€
Pd(OAc)2/dppp and Hunig’s base under carbon monoxide
b
at high temperature or pressure did not afford the desired
carboxylic acid.27 Pleasingly however, generation of car-
bon monoxide in situ using the modified conditions re-
ported by Caille and co-workers28 afforded the desired
carboxylic acid 13 in 61% yield.
We next sought to introduce further substituents onto
tricycle 11 and needed to establish whether a secondary
alcohol was compatible with the subsequent cyclization.
Toward this end, alcohol 10 was oxidized to the aldehyde
and treated with n-pentylmagnesium bromide to afford
secondary alcohol 14 (Scheme 3). Employing NBS with
BPO successfully afforded the desired tricycle 15, showing
that a secondary alcohol precursor bearing the requisite
side chain of berkelic acid could participate in the key
oxidative cyclization. The trans-stereochemistry between
H-3a and H-5 was assigned based on the observation of an
NOE between H-3a and H-10.
It was next decided to introduce the 6,5-spiroacetal unit
present in berkelic acid by incorporation of an additional
oxidative radical cyclization. In this case, a more substi-
tuted alkyne was required in the initial hydroarylation
step in order to introduce the 5-membered spiroacetal ring.
Alkylation of bromide 16 (Scheme 4) with phenol 7
afforded alkyne 6. Intramolecular hydroarylation with
Echavarren’s catalyst A and subsequent hydrogenation
with concomitant debenzylation over Adam’s catalyst
furnished chromane 5. Radical spirocyclization using
1
2
3
4
PtCl4
Ac
DCE, 80 °C, MW, 1 h
CH2Cl2, rt, 1.5 h
CH2Cl2, rt, 1.5 h
CH2Cl2, rt, 1.5 h
23
76
72
69
c
c
B/AgSbF6
C/AgSbF6
a All gold-catalyzed reactions were carried out in the dark. b 5 mol %.
c 1 mol % catalyst and cocatalyst if required.
Attention next focused on the key oxidative radical
€
cyclization using an oxa variant of the HofmannꢀLofflerꢀ
Freytag reaction.21 Applying the hypoiodite-induced
free-radical conditions successfully employed for the for-
mation of spiroacetals,22 alcohol 10 was irradiated (60 W)
in the presence of iodobenzene diacetate and iodine at
room temperature. In this case, alcohol 10 was found to
predominantly undergo a Norrish type I fragmentation
to form iodide 12 (Scheme 2).23 Treatment of alcohol 10
with DDQ, as reported by Pettus,6 did not result in the
formation of chromane 11. After a survey of reagents and
conditions, it was eventually found that treatment of 10
(18) (a) Wang, Y.; Ji, K.; Lan, S.; Zhang, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 1915–1918. (b) Lykakis, I. N.; Efe, C.; Gryparis, C.; Stratakis,
M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2334–2338.
(19) For recent reviews on gold catalysis, see: (a) Rudolph, M.;
€
Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2448–2462. (a) Furstner,
A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3208–3221. (b) Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem.
Rev. 2007, 107, 3180–3213. (c) Li, Z.; Brouwer, C.; He, C. Chem. Rev.
2008, 108, 3239–3265.
(20) Herrero-Gomez, E.; Nieto-Oberhuber, C.; Lopez, S.; Benet-
Buchholz, J.; Echavarren, A. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45,
5455–5459.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(24) Goddard, C. M.; Nowick, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1822–
ꢀ
ꢀ
(21) (a) de Armas, P.; Concepcion, J. I.; Francisco, C. G.; Hernandez,
ꢀ
1830.
(25) Walborsky, H. M.; Goedken, V. L.; Gawronsky, J. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 410–413.
R.; Salazar, J. A.; Suarez, E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1989, 405–
ꢀ
411. (b) Francisco, C. G.; Freire, R.; Herrera, A. J.; Perez-Martin, I.;
Suarez, E. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1959–1961.
ꢀ
(26) Boudet, N.; Lachs, J. R.; Knochel, P. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5525–
5528.
(27) Grimm, J. B.; Wilson, K. J.; Witter, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 4509–4513.
(22) (a) Furkert, D. P.; Brimble, M. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2,
3573–3583. (b) Meilert, K.; Brimble, M. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4,
2184–2192. (c) Sperry, J.; Liu, Y.-C.; Brimble, M. A. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2010, 8, 29–38.
(23) Heusler, K.; Kalvoda, J. Angew. Chem. 1964, 76, 518–531.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1964, 3, 525–538.
(28) Berger, P.; Bessmernykh, A.; Caille, J.-C.; Mignonac, S. Synthesis
2006, 18, 3106–3130.
5822
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 23, 2012