S. K. Bardaweel et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 558–560
559
NH2
(a)
(b)
N
N
N
O
N
H
N P O
O-
O
HN
OH OH
TpAd
H
N
O
n
R1
O
O
R3 R2
1 n= 1
2 n= 2
Figure 2. ecHinT inhibition resulted in impaired phenotype. ⁄Measurements were
carried out in duplicates and the standard deviation was 2%. Results for compound
6 taken from Ref. 12.
H
N
(c)
O
O
R1
N
H
O
the guanosine carbamate analogue ranged between 42
ecHinT and 34 M for hHint1. All compounds exhibited non-com-
petitive inhibition profiles.
lM for
l
R3
R2
Figure 1. Structures of (a) tryptamine 50-adenosine phosphoramidate and its (b)
ester and (c) carbamate analogues.
Recently, we have been able to connect ecHinT to an established
phenotype in bacteria. Using active site mutants, we demonstrated
that the catalytically active ecHinT is required for E. coli to utilize D-
alanine as a carbon source. To assess the ability of our compounds
to inhibit ecHinT in vivo, we tested the ability of E. coli BW25113
strain to grow on D-alanine in the presence of 100 lM of either
compound 3, 5 or 6. Cultures were grown in M9 media, supple-
mented with either 22 mM D,L-alanine or 10 mM glucose, at 37 °C
for 40 h before OD600 was measured. Consistent with our previous
finding, that the catalytic activity of ecHinT is required for E. coli to
velocity versus concentration using JMP IN 7 software. In the presence
of inhibitors, the proteins were pre-incubated with the tested inhibitor
for 30 s at 25 °C before the addition of the substrate. The reaction was
followed under the same condition as of in the absence of inhibitor.
While Hints did not show any appreciable esterase activity
against compound 1 and 2, kinetic analysis revealed a significant
and dose-dependent decrease in the apparent Vmax of Hint1 in the
presence of either compound 1 or 2 (Supplementary Fig. S1). In con-
trast, the Km value for TpAd was unaltered by the presence of the
inhibitor. Thus, the mechanism of inhibition was clearly of a non-
competitive type, suggesting that the inhibitor and TpAd substrate
do not share a common binding site on the enzyme. Ki values were
estimated from the Dixon plot and are summarized in Table 1.
A second series of carbamate analogues was prepared following
Schemes 2S and S3 (Supplementary data). As shown in Table 1,
compound 3, a thymidine carbamate analogue in which 3-hydro-
xyl group of the ribose ring was replaced with a primary amine
grow on
impaired growth when
D
-alanine, inhibition of ecHinT in BW25113 resulted in its
-alanine is the sole carbon source (Fig. 2).
D
In addition to the cell permeability properties of compounds 3, 5
and 6, no toxicity was observed with either inhibitor when glucose
is the sole carbon source in the growth medium.12
In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized the first gen-
eration of cell-permeable Hint inhibitors. Previously, we have
shown that
DhinT E. coli, a mutant strain in which hinT was deleted,
exhibited impaired growth when
D-lanine is the sole carbon
source.12 Using the developed inhibitors as chemical probes, this
work has demonstrated that inhibition of ecHinT resulted in simi-
group, inhibited Hint with a Ki value of 122
139 M for hHint1. Replacement of the amine group with an azido
moiety at the 30 position, compound 4, resulted in an inhibitor with
a Ki value of 565 M for ecHinT and 715 M for hHint1. The five-
lM for ecHinT and
lar impaired growth observed for
DhinT in the presence of D-ala-
l
nine as a sole carbon source. Guanosine carbamate, 6,12 one of
the best inhibitors reported in this study, may serve as structural
template for the design and development of more potent inhibitors
with enhanced inhibition constants. Ongoing crystallographic
studies of the inhibitor bound form of Hint should provide a struc-
tural foundation for understanding the mechanism of inhibition
and for the design of selective Hint inhibitors.
l
l
fold enhancement in equilibrium binding conferred by the amine
group at the 30 position is most likely explained by the formation
of favorable hydrogen bonding interactions between the inhibitor
and its binding site in the protein structure. Adenosine carbamate,
compound 5, and guanosine carbamate,12 compound 6, were the
most potent inhibitors prepared in this study. As shown in Table
1, Ki values for the adenosine carbamate analogue ranged between
Acknowledgment
73 lM for ecHinT and 103 lM for hHint1 while the Ki values for
This work was supported by a grant from the University of Min-
nesota AHC.
Table 1
Inhibition constants determined in HEPEs buffer (pH 7.2) at 25 °C
Supplementary data
Compds
R1
R2
R3
EcHinT Ki (
l
M)a
hHint1 Ki (l
M)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
Adenine
Adenine
Thymine
Thymine
Adenine
Guanine
OH
OH
H
H
OH
OH
OH
OH
NH2
N3
OH
OH
375 ( 13)
393 ( 17)
122 ( 10)
565 ( 23)
73 ( 4)
400 ( 27)
457 ( 32)
139 ( 17)
715 ( 35)
103 ( 18)
34 ( 4)
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
42 ( 6)b
1. Brenner, C.; Bieganowski, P.; Pace, H. C.; Huebner, K. J. Cell. Physiol. 1999, 181,
179.
2. Brenner, C. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 9003.
3. Weiske, J.; Huber, O. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 27356.
a
Values are means of three experiments, standard deviation is given in
parentheses.
b
Value was taken from Ref. 12.