rhodium acetate catalyzed dinitrogen extrusion from 1a;7
this cyclopropene was unstable but, as also reported by
Davies, could be trapped as a DielsꢀAlder adduct.8
Scheme 2. Possible Intervention of a Ketenimine
Careful examination of the 1H NMR data for the
reaction mixture from Rh2(pfb)4 catalysis of 1a with 2a
prior to chromatography provided evidence that the che-
mical shifts of the CH2 group protons of the product
are different from those of 3a, suggesting that an inter-
mediate in the reaction mixture is transformed into 3
during the chromatographic isolation procedure. A pro-
duct crystallized from this reaction mixture (prior to
chromatography, open to the atmosphere) and was identi-
fied as 7a. The connectivity of 7a suggests the intervention
of ketenimine 8a that could arise from ring-opening of the
product (9) from dipolar cycloaddition of the nitrile oxide
to cyclopropene 10a (Scheme 2).9 The conversion of 9a to
8a that involves migration of the aryl group from carbon to
nitrogen is an example of the rarely reported Lossen
rearrangement which is facilitated by aryl group elec-
tron-donating substituents.10
(“click” chemistry),12 the isocyanideꢀNefꢀPerkow reac-
tion sequence,13 from ynamides by Pd(0)-catalyzed N-to-
C allyl transfer,14 and even by pulsed pyrolysis of isoxazole.15
Their structural diversity is dependent on the methods for
their formation, and structure 8 is unique. Is ketenimine 8a
an actual intermediate along the pathway to either 3 or 7?
To answer this question we prepared the triisopropylsilyl
(TIPS)-protected enol diazoacetate 1f and subjected this
compound to reaction with 2a catalyzed by Rh2(pfb)4.
Ketenimine 8b was the only product formed and was
isolated in 62% yield (eq 3). Treatment of 8b with aqueous
trifluoroacetic acid gave the product identical to amide 7
except for the silyl group. These observations confirm that
dirhodium(II) catalysis of the reaction between enoldiazo-
acetates form a highly reactive cyclopropene intermediate that
undergoes reaction with nitrile oxides to form ketenimine
products. That the ketenimine is formed from a cyclopropene
intermediate was established by preparing the stable BHT
ester 1112 and then adding 2a with and without the presence of
rhodium acetate catalyst. Although reaction was slow in both
cases, presumably because of steric inhibition, ketenimine 12
was detected in about 30% yield in the reaction mixture by
NMR (eq 4), and its formation confirmed that cyclopropenes
with donor and acceptor groups are precursors to ketenimines
formed by cycloaddition with nitrile oxide.
Ketenimines (RR0CdCdNR00) are versatile reaction
intermediates in organic synthesis, and their formation
and reactions have been the subjects of intense interest.11
They are accessible via azide cycloaddition with acetylenes
(7) (a) Davies, H. M. L.; Houser, J. H.; Thornley, C. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 7529. (b) Davies, H. M. L.; Ahmed, G.; Churchill, M. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10774.
(8) When this reaction was performed in the presence of 2a (1.0 equiv)
and 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (1.0 equiv), 3a and the DielsꢀAlder
adduct were obtained in a 2:1 ratio.
(9) An analogous rearrangement of a 2-oxa-3-azabicyclo[3.1.0]-
hex-3-ene system (one example) involving ketenimine formation has
been reported: Nesi, R.; Giomi, D.; Papaleo, S.; Dapporto, P.; Paoli, P.
J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1990, 1675.
ꢀ
(10) (a) Dube, P.; Nathel, N. F. F.; Vetelino, M.; Couturier, M.;
Aboussafy, C. L.; Pichette, S.; Jorgensen, M. L.; Hardink, M. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 5622. (b) Berndt, D. C.; Shechter, H. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29,
916.
(11) (a) Wentrup, C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 393. (b) Koch, R.;
Finnerty, J. J.; Wentrup, C. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 6024. (c) Wang, J.;
Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, P.; Wang, Y. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3275.
(d) Chen, Z.; Ye, C.; Gao, L.; Wu, J. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5623.
(e) Alajarin, M.; Bonillo, B.; Ortin, M.-M.; Orenes, R.-A.; Vidal, A. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 6741. (f) Cheng, Y.; Ma, Y.-G.; Wang, X.-R.;
Mo, J.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 850. (g) Larksarp, C.; Sellier, O.;
Alper, H. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3502.
(12) (a) Hein, J. E.; Fokin, V. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1302. (b)
Kim, S. H.; Park, S. H.; Choi, J. H.; Chang, S. Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6,
2618. (c) Li, S.; Luo, Y.; Wu, J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4312. (d) Li, S.; Luo,
Y.; Wu, J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3190. (e) Namitharan, K.; Pitchumani, K.
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5728.
(13) Coffinier, D.; Kaim, L. E.; Grimaud, L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
1825.
(14) (a) DeKorver, K. A.; Johnson, W. L.; Zhang, Y.; Hsung, R. P.;
Dai, H.; Deng, J.; Lohse, A. G.; Zhang, Y.-S. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76,
5092. (b) DeKorver, K. A.; Hsung, R. P.; Lohse, A. G.; Zhang, Y. Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 1840.
The question that now arises is how are ketenimine
intermediates converted to 3? Is acid catalysis involved?
(15) Nunes, C. M.; Reva, I.; Pinho e Melo, T. M. V. D.; Fausto, R.;
ꢁ
Solomek, T.; Bally, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18911.
802
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 3, 2012