structures. Nevertheless, a suitable choice of side chain
features can surmount this limitation. Bulky chiral N-alkyl
side chains promote conformational ordering and can
induce chirality in the peptoid backbone.12 Handedness
of the secondary structure may thus be dictated by the
choice of side chain stereochemistry.13
Control of chirality has been demonstrated in a variety
of folded oligomeric systems and does not necessarily
require stereocenters in each of the monomer units.14
One approach is to incorporate a chiral “sergeant”, a
specific chiral center capable of directing chirality through-
out the oligomeric molecule.15 Alternatively, handedness
in folded oligomers can arise from the presence of other
chiral elements, such as a chiral axis.16
We now evaluate whether the inclusion of N-(1)-naphthyl
glycine monomers in peptoids may similarly provide re-
stricted rotation due to peri interactions. The peri hydrogen
atom (H8) in the naphthyl ring could engender a CꢀN(aryl)
rotational barrier of sufficient magnitude to generate atro-
pisomerism (Scheme 2C). Additionally, the use of naphthyl
amines to generate N-(1)-naphthyl peptoids may enable
convenient solid phase synthesis using an established
“submonomer” method.19
Scheme 2. Biaryl and Nonbiaryl Atropisomers: (A) Biphenyl,
(B) Tertiary Anilide, and (C) N,N-Disubstituted N-Naphthyl-
amide
Atropisomerism is a stereochemical phenomenon in
which the molecular chirality is established by virtue
of restricted rotation around one or more bonds
(Scheme 2A).17 For congested tertiary anilides, electronic
factors and steric hindrance can give rise to restricted
rotation around the CꢀN(aryl) bond, promoting atrop-
isomerism (Scheme 2B).16,18 We have previously demon-
strated that certain N-aryl peptoid oligomers incorporating
bulky ortho-substituted anilide groups display chiral attri-
butes due to atropisomerism.16 N-aryl peptoids including
ortho-iodo or ortho-tert-butyl anilide groups exhibit signifi-
cant energy barriers to rotation about the stereogenic
CꢀN(aryl) bond, allowing isolation of stable atropisomeric
forms. Unfortunately, the synthesis of ortho-substituted
N-aryl peptoids necessitates laborious solution phase
chemistry and purification of intermediates.
Quantum mechanical modeling of the N-(1)-naphthyl
peptoid minimal unit (Mono-1) indicates that conforma-
tional preferences are similar to those previously seen in
ortho-substituted anilides.16,20 In the low energy con-
formations, the naphthyl plane is oriented perpendi-
cular to the plane of the backbone amide (χ1 ≈ (100°;
Scheme 1A). The naphthyl group projects away from the
following backbone carbonyl oxygen. This side chain
rotamer is preferred by ∼1.6 kcal/mol at the B3LYP/6-
311þG** level of theory. Transition state energy calcu-
lations for rotation around the χ1 dihedral angle of
Mono-1 yielded barriers of ∼24ꢀ26 kcal/mol (see Sup-
porting Information, SI). The calculated rotational barrier
height is comparable to that previously observed in ortho-
substituted N-aryl peptoid atropisomers16 and indicates the
potential for axial chirality in N-(1)-naphthyl peptoids.
We synthesized an N-aryl peptoid monomer (Mono-2)
using 1-naphthyl amine as a synthon (Scheme 3A). Ad-
ditionally, an N-aryl peptoid monomer incorporating the
2-naphthyl group was synthesized as a control (Mono-3). For
the synthesis of the peptoid monomers, we used a solution
phase synthesis protocol as previously described.5,16
Scheme 1. (A) Dihedral Angles (ω, j, ψ, and χ1) for Peptoids and
(B) Amide Bond Isomerization in N-Alkyl and N-Aryl Peptoids
(15) (a) Green, M. M.; Peterson, N. C.; Sato, T.; Teramoto, A.;
Cook, R.; Lifson, S. Science 1995, 268, 1860. (b) Kamer, P. C. J.; Cleij,
M. C.; Nolte, R. J. M.; Harada, T.; Hezemans, A. M. F.; Drenth, W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1581.
(16) Paul, B.; Butterfoss, G. L.; Boswell, M. G.; Renfrew, P. D.;
Yeung, F. G.; Shah, N. H.; Wolf, C.; Bonneau, R.; Kirshenbaum, K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10910.
(11) Stringer, J. R.; Crapster, J. A.; Guzei, I. A.; Blackwell, H. E.
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 6068.
(12) Wu, C. W.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Sanborn, T. J.; Patch, J. A.;
Huang, K.; Dill, K. A.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 13525.
(17) (a) Eliel, E.L.; ; Wilen, S. H. Stereochemistry of Organic Com-
pounds; Wiley Interscience: New York, 1994. (b) Wolf, C. Dynamic
Stereochemistry of Chiral Compounds; RSC Publishing: Cambridge,
2008. (c) Clayden, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 949.
(18) (a) Curran, D. P.; Qi, H.; Geib, S. J.; DeMello, N. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3131. (b) Clayden, J.; Vallverdu, L.; Helliwell, M.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 2106.
(13) Wu, C. W.; Sanborn, T. J.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2958.
(19) Zuckermann, R. N.; Kerr, J. M.; Kent, S. B. H.; Moos, W. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10646.
(20) (a) Adler, T.;Bonjoch, J.;Clayden, J.;Font-Bardia, M.;Pickworth,
M.; Solans, X.; Sole, D.; Vallverdu, L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3173. (b)
Curran, D. P.; Hale, G. R.; Geib, S. J.; Balog, A.; Cass, Q. B.; Degani,
A. L. G.; Hernandes, M. Z.; Freitas, L. C. G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1997, 8, 3955.
(14) (a) Kendhale, A. M.; Poniman, L.; Dong, Z.; Laxmi-Reddy, K.;
Kauffmann, B.; Ferrand, Y.; Huc, I. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 76, 195. (b)
Sola, J.; Morris, G. A.; Clayden, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3712. (c)
Ko, E.; Liu, J.; Perez, L. M.; Lu, G.; Schaefer, A.; Burgess, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 133, 462. (d) Gaucher, A.; Dutot, L.; Barbeau, O.;
Wakselman, M.; Mazaleyrat, J.-P.; Peggion, C.; Oancea, S.; Formaggio,
F.; Crisma, M.; Toniolo, C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 30.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 3, 2012
927