A CLASS OF PHOTOCHROMIC DIARYLETHENES BEARING INTRAMOLECULAR
with CHCl3 (3 ×00A020 ml). The combined organic phase was
washed with water and dried over MgSO4. After evaporation of
the solvent, the crude product was purified by flash column
chromatography (elute: petroleum ether / ethyl acetate = 20:1)
to afford target compounds
UV
Vis
S
S
R
R
R
R
S
S
a
b
1a: 70 %. 1H‐NMR (DMSO‐d6) δ: 13.06 (s, 1H), 12.66 (s, 1H),
8.04 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (t, J1 = 7.2 Hz, J2 = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.27
(s, 1H), 7.06–7.02 (m, 2H), 6.92 (s, 1H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 2.13 (s, 3H).
13 C‐NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ: 157.22, 146.54, 137.30, 134.68,
131.76, 130.85, 129.01, 127.72, 127.46, 125.46, 125.19, 124.62,
122.58, 119.58, 117.47, 113.41, 14.54, 14.13. HRMS (m/z): calcd.
for C19H14Cl2N2OS2 : 419.9925, Found: 420.0016.
open isomer (colorless)
closed isomer (colored)
Scheme 1. Illustration of photochromism of diarylethene with UV–Vis
light irradiation
EXPERIMENTAL
2a: 75 %. 1H‐NMR (DMSO‐d6) δ: 12.73 (s, 1H), 12.66 (s, 1H),
9.75 (s, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (s, 1H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 6.35
(d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (s, 1H), 2.48 (s, 3H), 2.01 (s, 3H). 13 C‐NMR
(101 MHz, DMSO) δ: 160.09, 158.94, 147.25, 136.94, 134.37,
132.12, 131.15, 129.38, 129.02, 127.74, 126.57, 125.05, 124.48,
121.59, 107.76, 105.47, 103.55, 14.54, 14.14. HRMS (GC ‐ TOF)
(m/z): calcd. for C19H14Cl2N2O2S2 : 435.9874, Found: 435.9847.
3a: 68 %. 1H‐NMR (DMSO‐d6) δ: 12.66 (s, 1H), 12.57 (s, 1H),
7.78 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 6.90 (s, 1H), 6.37 (d, J = 8.9 Hz,
1H), 6.23 (s, 1H), 3.48 (t, 4H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 3H), 1.21 (q, 6H).
13 C‐NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ: 159.61, 150.54, 148.52, 137.34,
134.85, 132.05, 131.77, 129.73, 128.59, 128.47, 127.15, 125.65,
125.09, 121.77, 104.60, 102.22, 99.29, 44.93, 15.23, 14.84, 13.86.
HRMS (GC ‐ TOF) (m/z): calcd. for C23H23Cl2N3OS2 : 491.0660,
Found: 491.0279.
General methods
1H‐NMR spectrum was recorded at 400 MHz with tetramethylsilane
as an internal reference and DMSO‐d6 as solvent. HRMS spectra
were recorded with matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization
mass spectrometry. Absorption spectra and fluorescence spectra
were measured with an absorption spectrophotometer (Hitachi
U‐3010) Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Japan and a fluo-
rescence spectrophotometer (F‐2500) Hitachi High‐Technologies
Corporation, Japan., respectively. All chemicals for synthesis were
purchased from commercial suppliers, and solvents were purified
according to standard procedures. Reaction was monitored by thin
layer chromatography silica gel plates (60 F‐254). Column chroma-
tography was performed on silica gel (Merck, 70–230 mesh) Merck
Chemicals Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. A 360‐nm lamp (36 W) and a
Xenon light (500 W), with different wavelength filters, were used as
light sources for photocoloration and photobleaching, respectively.
1
4a: 62 %. H‐NMR (DMSO‐d6) δ: 12.17 (s, 1H), 8.14 (d, J = 7.7 Hz,
1H), 7.50 (t, J1 = 8.7 Hz, J2 = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H),
7.15 (t, J1 = 7.2 Hz, J2 = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (s, 2H), 4.02 (s, 3H),
2.23 (s, 6H). 13 C‐NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ: 156.47, 143.84,
134.17, 130.43, 129.19, 128.52, 128.33, 128.22, 124.32, 122.66,
119.15, 112.21, 56.09, 14.37. HRMS (GC ‐ TOF) (m/z): calcd.
for C20H16Cl2N2OS2 : 434.0081, Found: 434.0014.
Synthesis of diarylethenes 1a–6a
Target compounds 1a–6a were prepared according to the
synthetic route presented in Scheme 3. Diketone was obtained
starting from commercially available 2‐methylthiophene, which
was chlorinated at the 5‐position with N‐chlorosuccinimide in
AcOH,[43] followed by acylation with oxalyl chloride in dichloro-
methane. Treatment of diketone with salicylaldehyde in the
presence of NH4Ac afforded target compounds. The details of
the procedure are as follows: to a solution of diketone
(100 mg, 0.31 mmol) in acetic acid (10 ml) was added substi-
tuted benzaldehyde derivatives (0.37 mmol) and NH4Ac
(143 mg, 1.86 mmol), and the mixture was heated at reflux until
the starting material disappeared (thin layer chromatography
detection). The mixture solution was then slowly poured into a
NaHCO3 solution (10%, 50 ml), and the product was extracted
5a: 72 %. 1H‐NMR (DMSO‐d6) δ: 12.42 (s, 1H), 9.69 (s, 1H),
7.81 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (s, 1H), 7.11 (s, 1H), 6.83 (d,
J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 2.16 (s, 3H), 2.0 (s, 3H). 13 C‐NMR (101 MHz, DMSO)
δ: 157.89, 146.19, 135.38, 133.68, 133.26, 132.13, 128.41, 127.99,
127.63, 126.74, 124.17, 123.35, 121.99, 121.46, 115.49, 13.93,
13.58. HRMS (GC ‐ TOF) (m/z): calcd. for C19H14Cl2N2OS2
:
419.9925, Found: 420.9842.
1
6a: 60 %. H‐NMR (DMSO‐d6) δ: 12.44 (s, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.8 Hz,
2H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (s, 1H), 6.88 (s, 1H), 3.06
(s, 6H), 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.10 (s, 3H). 13 C‐NMR (101 MHz, DMSO)
δ: 150.32, 146.58, 133.37, 131.86, 130.11, 128.05, 126.18, 123.65,
118.04, 111.89, 40.33, 13.72. HRMS (GC ‐ TOF) (m/z): calcd. for
C21H19Cl2N2S2 : 447.0397, Found: 447.0477.
R
R
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
O
H
Intramolecular
hydrogen bond
OH
The ring‐opening and ring‐closing photoisomerization of diary-
lethenes is illustrated in Scheme 1. Upon irradiation with UV light
(254 nm), the ring‐open isomers underwent photocyclization to
ring‐closed isomers. The absorption spectra also changed during
photocyclization. Figure 1 represents the absorption changes of
1a with UV light irradiation. The absorption of 1a, appearing at
HN
N
HN
N
Cl
Cl
Cl
S
S
Cl
S
S
1a R = H
2a R = OH
3a R = NEt2
λ
max = 314 nm, decreased and two main absorptions at 542 nm
and 345 nm, corresponding to 1b, appeared and increased until
the photostationary state was reached. The clear isosbestic point
showed that the photo‐conversion occurred between 1a and 1b,
Scheme 2. Structure of photochromic diarylethenes 1a–3a
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2012, 25 142–146
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/poc