288
L. Aguado et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 49 (2012) 279e288
12.16 (br s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz)
d
: 25.42 (CH3),
with a radius of 1.4 Å, defined the solute boundaries, and a minimum
separation of 10 Å was left between any solute atom and the borders
of the box. The interior of the ligands was considered a low-
dielectric medium (ε ¼ 2) whereas the surrounding solvent was
treated as a high-dielectric medium (ε ¼ 80).
55.37 (CH2N), 62.07 (CH2O), 116.69, 117.87, 118.01, 122.13, 129.89,
133.47,135.18, 139.64 (Ar, C-5, C-4),151.58,152.55, (C-6, C-8), 155.30
(CO), 159.93 (C-2). Anal. calc. for (C15H12ClN5O3): C, 52.11; H, 3.50;
N, 20.26. Found C, 51.96; H, 3.55; N, 20.12.
Acknowledgements
4.1.23. 2-((3-(6-Ethoxy-9H-purin-9-yl)phenyl)amino)ethanol (45)
A microwave vial containing compound 41 (50 mg, 0.16 mmol)
and NaOH 12.5N (0.15 mL) in ethanol (0.7 mL) was irradiated at
50 ꢀC for 15 min. Then, ethyl acetate was added (20 mL) and the
crude reaction mixture was washed with brine (20 mL). The organic
layer was decanted, dried and evaporated. The residue was purified
by CCTLC in the Chromatothron (dichloromethane:methanol, 40:1)
to yield 36 mg of 45 (78%). Mp 131e133 ꢀC. EM (ES, positive mode):
L.A. thanks the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (MEC)
for an FPU predoctoral fellowship. M.-C. C. thanks the Fondo Social
Europeo (FSE) and the JAE Predoc Programme for a predoctoral
fellowship. We thank Ms. María Nares for excellent technical
assistance and the support of the Spanish MEC and the Fondo Social
Europeo (FSE). This project has been supported by the Spanish
CICYT (SAF2009-13914-C02-01). We also would like to acknowl-
edge Stijn Delmotte, Tom Bellon, Mieke Flament, and Annelies De
Ceulaer for their excellent technical assistance in the acquisition of
the antiviral data.
m/z 290 (M þ H)þ; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz)
: 1.44 (t, J ¼ 7.0 Hz,
d
3H, CH3), 3.17 (t, J ¼ 5.8 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.57 (t, J ¼ 5.8 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.63
(q, J ¼ 7.0 Hz, 2H, CH2), 5.95 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.01 (m, 4H, Ar), 8.56 (s,
1H, H-8), 8.70 (s, 1H, H-2). Anal. calc. for (C15H17N5O2): C, 60.19; H,
5.72; N, 23.40. Found C, 59.95; H, 5.84; N, 23.57.
Appendix. Supplementary data
4.2. Biological methods
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
include MOL files and InChiKeys of the most important compounds
described in this article.
4.2.1. Antiviral activity
Serial dilutions of the compounds and 100 CCID50 of virus were
added to the appropriate cell line, grown in 96-well plates. After 3
days of incubation at 37 ꢀC (35 ꢀC for rhinovirus 14), a time at which
complete virus-induced cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed in the
infected and untreated virus control conditions (VC), cell viability
was measured using the MTS/PMS method (Promega, Leiden, The
Netherlands).The optical density of each well was measured spec-
trophotometrically at 498 nm using a microplate reader (Safire2,
Tecan, Switzerland). Raw values were converted to percentage of
controls and the 50% effective concentration (EC50) was calculated
by linear interpolation as the concentration of compound that is
supposed to inhibit virus-induced cell death by 50%. Similarly, the
EC90 was calculated. Selective antiviral activity was confirmed by
microscopic quality control i.e. the absence of signs of virus-
induced CPE as well as the absence of compound-induced
adverse effects on the host cell (which is mostly apparent as
alteration of cell morphology as compared to untreated, uninfected
cells). Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate.
References
[1] M.H. Sawyer, Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 13 (2002) 40e47.
[2] C. Kawai, Circulation 99 (1999) 1091e1100.
[3] K.U. Knowlton, CVB infection and mechanisms of viral cardiomyopathy, in:
Group B Coxsackieviruses (2008), pp. 315e335.
[4] A.M. De Palma, I. Vliegen, E. De Clercq, J. Neyts, Med. Res. Rev. 28 (2008)
823e884.
[5] K.M. Drescher, S.M. Tracy, The CVB and etiology of type 1 diabetes, in: Group B
Coxsackieviruses (2008), pp. 259e274.
[6] S. Huber, A.I. Ramsingh, Viral Immunol. 17 (2004) 358e369.
[7] A.M. De Palma, W. Heggermont, K. Lanke, B. Coutard, M. Bergmann,
A.M. Monforte, B. Canard, E. De Clercq, A. Chimirri, G. Purstinger, J. Rohayem,
F. van Kuppeveld, J. Neyts, J. Virol. 82 (2008) 4720e4730.
[8] M.P. Langford, W.A. Ball, J.P. Ganley, Antivir. Res. 27 (1995) 355e365.
[9] A.M. De Palma, H.J. Thibaut, L. van der Linden, K. Lanke, W. Heggermont,
S. Ireland, R. Andrews, M. Arimilli, T.H. Al-Tel, E. De Clercq, F. van Kuppeveld,
J. Neyts, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53 (2009) 1850e1857.
[10] B.A. Heinz, L.M. Vance, J. Virol. 69 (1995) 4189e4197.
[11] L. Aguado, H.J. Thibaut, E.M. Priego, M.L. Jimeno, M.J. Camarasa, J. Neyts,
M.J. Pérez-Pérez, J. Med. Chem. 53 (2010) 316e324.
[12] C.L. Cooper, Clin. Infect. Dis. 41 (2005) S69eS72.
[13] H.J. Thibaut, P. Leyssen, G. Puerstinger, A. Muigg, J. Neyts, A.M. De Palma,
Antivir. Res. 90 (2011) 213e217.
[14] M. Sala, A.M. De Palma, H. Hrebabecky, R. Nencka, M. Dracinsky, P. Leyssen,
J. Neyts, A. Holy, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 (2010) 4374e4384.
[15] L. Aguado, M.J. Camarasa, M.J. Pérez-Pérez, J. Comb. Chem. 11 (2009) 210e212.
[16] M. Graupe, R.L. Halcomb, WO2009005687A1, (2009).
[17] L.-L. Gundersen, M. Braendvang, US20070203159A1, (2007).
[18] S. Ueda, H. Nagasawa, J. Org. Chem. 74 (2009) 4272e4277.
[19] A.B. Cooper, US2009118284, (2009).
[20] T. Taniguchi, N. Goto, H. Ishibashi, Tetrahedron Lett. 50 (2009) 4857e4858.
[21] H.J. Thibaut, L. van der Linden, J. Paeshuyse, A. De Palma, L. Aguado, F. Van
Kuppeveld, M.J. Pérez-Pérez, J. Neyts, Antivir. Res. 86 (2010) A27eA27.
[22] M.J.T. Frisch, G. W., H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman,
J.A. Montgomery, Jr., T. Vreven, K.N. Kudin, J.C. Burant, J.M. Millam, S.S. Iyengar,
J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G.A. Petersson,
H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida,
T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J.E. Knox, Hratchian,
H. P., Cross, J. B., Bakken, V., Adamo, C., Jaramillo, J., Gomperts, R., Stratmann,
R. E., Yazyev, O., Austin, A. J., Cammi, R., Pomelli, C., Ochterski, J. W., Ayala, P. Y.,
Morokuma, K., Voth, G. A., Salvador, P., Dannenberg, J. J., Zakrzewski, V. G.,
Dapprich, S., Daniels, A. D., Strain, M. C., Farkas, O., Malick, D. K., Rabuck, A. D.,
Raghavachari, K., Foresman, J. B., Ortiz, J. V., Cui, Q., Baboul, A. G., Clifford, S.,
Cioslowski, J., Stefanov, B. B., Liu, G.Cioslowski, J.Liashenko, A., Piskorz, P.,
Komaromi, I., Martin, R. L., Fox, D. J., Keith, T., Al-Laham, M. A., Peng, C. Y.,
Nanayakkara, A., Challacombe, M., Gill, P. M. W., Johnson, B., Chen, W., Wong,
M. W., Gonzalez, C., Pople, J. A, (2004).
4.2.2. Cytotoxic assays
The same experimental set-up was used as for the antiviral
assay except that the cultures were not infected. Each experiment
was repeated at least three times. The evaluation of the overall anti-
metabolic effect of the selected compounds was performed using
the MTS/PMS method Assay (Promega). Raw values were converted
to percentage of controls and the 50% cytotoxic concentration
(CC50) was calculated using linear interpolation as the concentra-
tion of compound that inhibited overall cell metabolism by 50%.
Microscopic quality control was used to confirm the observations
made in the antiviral assay.
4.3. Computational methods
The geometries of compounds 4, 18, 20, 32, 34 and 41 were
optimized using the ab initio quantum chemistry programme
Gaussian 03 [22] and the RHF/6-21G* basis set. Finite difference
solutions to the linearized PoissoneBoltzman equation, as imple-
mented in the Delphi software (v.4) [23,24] were used to calculate
MEPs. For MEP calculations cubic grids with a resolution of 1.0 Å
were centered on each molecule, and the atomic charges were
distributed onto the grid points. AMBER charges and radii were
used. Solvent-accessible surfaces, calculated with a spherical probe
[23] W. Rocchia, S. Sridharan, A. Nicholls, E. Alexov, A. Chiabrera, B. Honig,
J. Comput. Chem. 23 (2002) 128e137.
[24] W. Rocchia, E. Alexov, B. Honig, J. Phys. Chem. B. 105 (2001) 6507e6514.