Table 2 Scope of the sequential Pd-catalyzed oxidative–non-oxidative twofold alkenylation of acetanilides 1
Entry
1
R1
R2
R3
2 (yield)
3 (yield)
R4
4 (yield)a
4 (yield)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1a
–H
–H
–H
2a (89%)
3a (76%)
–CO2CH3
-para-C6H5
-para-C6H4NO2
–CO2CH3
–CO2CH3
–CO2CH3
–CO2CH3
–CO2CH3
–CO2CH3
–CO2CH3
–CO2CH3
4a (90%)
4ab (68%)
4ac (76%)
4b (quant.)
4c (quant.)
4d (quant.)
4e (quant.)
4f (76%)
4a (61%)
4ab (66%)
4ac (34%)
4b (40%)
4c (51%)
4d (43%)
4e (49%)
4a (49%)
4g (14%)
4h (56%)
4i (57%)
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
1g
1h
1i
–H
–H
–H
–H
–H
–H
–H
–CF3
–H
–OMe
–H
–OH
–Br
–Cl
–H
–H
–C6H5
2b (85%)
2c (80%)
2d (55%)c
2e (49%)
2f (73%)
2g (40%)
2h (72%)
2i (60%)
3b (94%)
3c (65%)
3d (92%)
3e (70%)
3f (43%)
3g (50%)
3h (77%)
3i (60%)d
–OMe
–H
–H
–H
–Cl
–H
9
10
11
4g (37%)
4h (quant.)
4i (52%)
–H
a
b
Yields of isolated products 4 obtained from diazonium salts 3. Yields of isolated products 4 obtained through one-flask sequence from
c
acetanilides 2. Reagents and conditions: BQ (1.0 equiv.), p-TSA (0.5 equiv.), Pd(OAc)2 (2.0 mol%), methyl acrylate (1.2 equiv.), acetic acid/
d
toluene (2 : 1), 20 1C. 2.0 equiv. of tert-BuONO were required.
gives an improved overall yield of 4ab, the yield of 4ac is somewhat
lower (entries 2 and 3). As can be seen from entries 4 to 11, the
oxidative–non-oxidative Heck coupling sequence can be realized
for various substituted acetanilides 1b–i in acceptable yields.
A notable exception is ortho-chloro acetanilide 1g. For this
derivative only moderate yields of approximately 40% were
obtained for each individual step, and a low yield of 14% of 4g
if the one-flask conditions were applied (entry 9). In the case of
paracetamol (1d, entry 6) K2S2O8 turned out to be an unsuitable
oxidant for the oxidative Heck reaction, because 2d was observed
only in minor amounts, along with numerous unidentified
byproducts. We assume that due to the para-OH group the
aromatic core is easily oxidized, inducing various side reactions.
Therefore, van Leeuwen’s conditions were used for this particular
example, providing 2d in 55% yield. Diazonium salt formation
and subsequent Heck reaction to 4d worked very well for this
derivative, without the necessity to protect the OH-group. Finally,
we applied the sequence to biaryl 1i (entry 11), which was
synthesized from 1e using a Suzuki–Miyaura coupling with phenyl
boronic acid. The conversion of 2i to 4i was achieved in 57% yield.
Thus, the triple substituted benzene 4i was obtained from 1e via
three consecutive mechanistically distinct Pd-catalyzed C–C-bond
forming reactions. In summary, we have shown that an acetamide
group attached to an aromatic core may serve as a catalyst
directing and leaving group, and that acetanilides can be converted
by a sequence of mechanistically distinct Pd-catalyzed coupling
reactions to dialkenylated arenes.
3 G. P. McGlacken and I. J. S. Fairlamb, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009,
4011–4029.
4 Y. Fujiwara, I. Noritani, S. Danno, R. Asano and S. Teranishi,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 7166–7169.
5 Y. Fujiwara, K. Tabaki and Y. Taniguchi, Synlett, 1996, 591–599.
6 E. M. Ferreira, H. Zhang and B. M. Stoltz, in The Mizoroki–Heck
Reaction, ed. M. Oestreich, Wiley, Chichester, 2009, pp. 345–382.
7 M. Miura and T. Satoh, Top. Organomet. Chem., 2005, 14, 55–83.
8 C. Jia, T. Kitamura and Y. Fujiwara, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34,
633–639.
9 T. W. Lyons and M. S. Sanford, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 1147–1169.
10 Y. Ie, N. Chatani, T. Ogo, D. R. Marshall, T. Fukuyama,
F. Kakiuchi and S. Murai, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 1475–1488.
11 M. Miura, T. Tsuda, T. Satoh, S. Pivsa-Art and M. Nomura,
J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 5211–5215.
12 F. W. Patureau and F. Glorius, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
9982–9983.
13 G. T. Lee, X. Jiang, K. Prasad, O. Repic and T. J. Blacklock, Adv.
Synth. Catal., 2005, 347, 1921–1924.
14 M. D. K. Boele, G. P. F. van Strijdonck, A. H. M. de Vries, P. C.
J. Kamer, J. G. de Vries and P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 1586–1587.
15 G. Rousseau and B. Breit, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 2450–2494.
16 B. Schmidt, R. Berger and F. Holter, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8,
¨
1406–1414.
17 B. Schmidt, F. Holter, R. Berger and S. Jessel, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
¨
2010, 352, 2463–2473.
18 A. Roglans, A. Pla-Quintana and M. Moreno-Manas, Chem. Rev.,
2006, 106, 4622–4643.
19 J. G. Taylor, A. V. Moro and C. R. D. Correia, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2011, 1403–1428.
20 F.-X. Felpin, L. Nassar-Hardy, F. Le Callonnec and E. Fouquet,
Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 2815–2831.
21 C. Jia, W. Lu, T. Kitamura and Y. Fujiwara, Org. Lett., 1999, 1,
2097–2100.
22 X. Zhao, C. S. Yeung and V. M. Dong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
132, 5837–5844.
23 B. S. Kim, C. Jang, D. J. Lee and S. W. Youn, Chem.–Asian J.,
2010, 5, 2336–2340.
This work was generously supported by the DFG. We thank
Evonik Oxeno for generous donations of solvents, and Umicore
for generous donations of Pd-catalysts.
24 M. P. Doyle and W. J. Bryker, J. Org. Chem., 1979, 44, 1572–1574.
25 K. Voigt, A. Lansky, A. de Meijere and M. Noltemeyer, Liebigs
Ann., 1996, 899–911.
26 C. L. Oswald, J. A. Peterson and H. W. Lam, Org. Lett., 2009, 11,
4504–4507.
27 B. Chao and D. C. Dittmer, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 6001–6004.
Notes and references
1 Modern Arylation Methods, ed. L. Ackermann, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2009.
2 The Mizoroki–Heck Reaction, ed. M. Oestreich, Wiley, Chichester,
2009.
c
4352 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 4350–4352
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012