Paper
RSC Advances
110.6 (1CA), 111.3 (1CA), 111.5 (1CB), 117.0 (1CB), 117.3 (1CA),
125.2 (1CA + 1CB), 125.4 (1CA), 126.5 (1CB), 136.4 (1CA), 138.0
(1CB), 147.6 (1CB), 147.7 (1CA), 148.0 (1CA), 148.3 (1CB), 161.1
(1CA), 161.6 (1CB); ESI-MS: m/z ¼ 248.2 [M + H]+, 270.0 [M + Na]+,
495.2 [2M + H]+; HMRS calcd for C18H19N: 247.12084; found
247.12075.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have reported the cyclization of allenamides
to 1-vinyl tetrahydroisoquinolines in the presence of chiral
phosphoric acids. The formyl protecting group turned out to be
crucial for the catalysis by improving substrate/catalyst recog-
nition via hydrogen bond interaction. The use of formyl group
in other Brønsted acid catalysed reactions is suggested.27
Fig. 3 Proposed transition state for the reaction.
traces for the desired products using less hindered Brønsted
acid 12f. In the case of the allenamides 10f, 10h and 10i the
major hindrance of the substrates is probably retarding
considerably the cyclization. In such conditions the hydrolysis
of the iminium by adventitious water is competitive and we
observed the presence of the corresponding amides. In the case
of allenamides 10g we can suggest that the reduced nucleo-
philicity of the aromatic ring can be responsible for the failure
of the reaction.
Acknowledgements
Bologna University, Fondazione Del Monte, and the European
Commission through the project MOLARNET, FP7-ICT, 318516,
are acknowledged for nancial support.
Notes and references
Finally, the absolute conguration of 11e, obtained with (R)-
12d, was established to be R, by comparison of optical rotation
with literature data.15 On the basis of this nding the model
illustrated in Fig. 3 is suggested for the transition state of the
reaction. In particular, given the importance of the formyl group,
we assume that the recognition and the high enantiomeric excess
obtained for the reaction is determined by the hydrogen bonding
of the catalyst with the hydrogen atom of the formyl group.26
1 (a) D. Jack and R. Williams, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 1669; (b)
K. W. Bentley, Nat. Prod. Rep., 2006, 23, 444; (c) Q. Y. Zhang,
G. Z. Tu, Y. Y. Zhao and T. M. Cheng, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58,
6795; (d) A. J. Aladesanmi, C. J. Kelly and J. D. Leary, J. Nat.
Prod., 1983, 46, 127; (e) A. Zhang, J. L. Neumeyer and
R. J. Baldessarini, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 274; (f) K. Ye,
Y. Ke, N. Keshava, J. Shanks, J. A. Kapp, R. R. Tekmal,
J. Petros and H. C. Joshi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
1998, 95, 1601; (g) A. Gualandi, L. Mengozzi, E. Manoni
and P. G. Cozzi, Catal. Lett., 2015, DOI: 10.1007/s10562-
014-1396-0.
Experimental
General procedure for synthesis of compound 11e
To a solution of allenamide (0.1 mmol, 1 equiv.) in tri-
uorotoluene (1 mL) were added the Brønsted acid (0.01 mmol,
2 K. Prasat, M. Chulabhorn and R. Somsak, Curr. Top. Med.
Chem., 2014, 14, 239.
˚
0.1 equiv.), molecular sieves 4 A (50 mg) and then the reaction
3 L. Mengozzi, A. Gualandi and P. G. Cozzi, Chem. Sci., 2014, 5,
3915.
4 M. Chrzanowska and M. D. Rozwadowska, Chem. Rev., 2004,
104, 3341.
5 A. Reissert, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1905, 38, 1603.
6 K. Funabashi, H. Ratni, M. Kanai and M. Shibasaki, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 10784.
7 (a) A. M. Taylor and S. L. Schreiber, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 143; (b)
S. Wang and C. T. Seto, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 3979; (c) S. Wang,
M. B. Onaran and C. T. Seto, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 2090; (d)
T. Hashimoto, M. Omote and K. Maruoka, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8952.
8 W. Lin, T. Cao, W. Fan, Y. Han, J. Kuang, H. Luo, B. Miao,
X. Tang, Q. Yu, W. Yuan, J. Zhang, C. Zhu and S. Ma,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 277.
9 D. Ma, J. Dai, Y. Qiu, C. Fu and S. Ma, Org. Chem. Front., 2014,
1, 7892.
was stirred under nitrogen for 24 h. The solvent was removed
under reduced pressure and the crude was directly puried by
ash chromatography on silica gel (cyclohexane/ethyl acetate,
3/7) to give 11e: sticky white solid, 9.9 mg, 40% yield, 81% ee;
the ee was determined via reduction of the product with LiAlH4
by HPLC analysis, Daicel Chiralpak® OD-H column: n-hexane/i-
PrOH from 90 : 10, ow rate 0.70 mL minꢁ1, 40 ꢀC, l ¼ 285 nm:
smajor ¼ 7.87 min, sminor ¼ 14.93 min; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) (two rotamers A : B, ratio 1 : 1): d 2.62–2.72 (2HB, m),
2.78–2.91 (2HA, m), 3.13 (1HB, ddd, J ¼ 4.7 Hz, J ¼ 11.0 Hz, J ¼
15.6 Hz), 3.45 (1HA, ddd, J ¼ 4.2 Hz, J ¼ 13.0 Hz, J ¼ 13.0 Hz),
3.65 (1HA, dd, J ¼ 5.8 Hz, J ¼ 13.2 Hz), 3.80 (3HA, s), 3.81 (3HA +
3HB, s), 3.82 (3HB, s), 4.29 (1HB, m), 5.02 (1HB, d, J ¼ 5.7 Hz),
5.09 (1HA, d, J ¼ 17 Hz), 5.11 (1HB, d, J ¼ 17.0 Hz), 5.19 (1HA, d,
J ¼ 10.1 Hz), 5.20 (1HB, d, J ¼ 10.1 Hz), 5.78 (1HA, d, J ¼ 5.6 Hz),
5.86–5.99 (1HA + 1HB, m), 6.55 (1HA, s), 6.56 (1HA + 1HB, s), 6.59
(1HB, s), 8.15 (1HA, s), 8.25 (1HB, s); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 10 Y. M. Wilson, M. Durrenberger, E. S. Nogueir and T. R. Ward,
¨
d 27.6 (1CB), 29.2 (1CA), 35.1 (1CB), 40.2 (1CA), 52.7 (1CA), 55.8
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 8928; and references therein.
(1CA), 55.8 (1CA), 55.9 (1CA), 56.0 (1CB), 58.7 (1CB), 110.1 (1CB), 11 E. D. Cox and J. M. Cook, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 1797.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 10546–10550 | 10549