E. Nishimura et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 2951–2953
2953
study, BI-II 546CL and 2-aminobenzothiazole were detected from Bi-sifrol
tablets, but others were not detected.
Compound 1 and 2 increased the oxidation stage compared with
pramipexole, we expected that the singlet oxygen involve the
photo-degradation. Therefore the methanolic solution of pramip-
exole and catalytic rosebengal were subjected to photo-irradiation
under an atmosphere of oxygen. Using 2.0 g of pramipexole, the
reaction was completely finished in 6 hours, and we isolated com-
pound 3 (455 mg, 21.5%) and 4 (129 mg, 5.6%)8 (Fig. 5). Hydrolysis
of 3 was performed by treatment with LiOH to give 1 in high
yields.9
O
H
OH
N
H
N
S
N
S
N
S
N
NH2
NH2
NH2
HCl
BI-II 546CL
2-aminobenzothiazole
BI-II 820BS
The two spots (compounds 5 and 6) on TLC examination at an
early stage of photo-irradiation were purified with silica gel chro-
matography.10 The HR-ESI MS of 5 indicated the C11H20N3O2S
based on molecular related ion (M+H)+ m/z 258.1259 (calculated
258.1276), which supported that the compound includes sulfur
atom. Compound 5 showed similar spectrum in 1H NMR to that
of 2, however, the amide signal of 5 in 13C NMR spectrum observed
down field shift to d 196.1 ppm. Therefore, we determined as (S,E)-
methyl 2-(5-(carbamolimino)-1-propylpyrrolidin-2yl) acetate
(Fig. 6). Compound 5 was photoirradiated to give 3.11
HN
S
O
S
O
N
HN
H
N
N
N
H
S
H2N
NH2
N
BI-II 751xx
BI-II 786BS
The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 6 showed two A2B2-type
signals at d 6.64 and 6.73 only in the aromatic region. The GC-MS
analysis of 6 was detected (M)+ at m/z 110, and the fragment ion
of 6 was consistent with authentic pyrocatechol spectrum in EI-
MS. From these photo-degradation products of pramipexole, we
consider the reaction mechanism to be as illustrated in Scheme 1.
The reaction starts from addition of the singlet oxygen to thia-
zole ring as [2+2]cycloaddition. The C–C bond cleavage of thiazole,
followed by secondary amine attack to carbonyl group affords the
pyrrolidine structure.12 Then it was solvolyzed to give carboxylic
acid and methyl ester.
In summary, we carried out photo-irradiation experiments of
the Bi-sifrol tablets and succeeded in the characterization of four
pyrrolidine compounds as photo-degradation products. Further-
more, we observed that the photo-degradation of pramipexole
was smoothly carried out in the methanolic solution, and eluci-
dated the possible degradation mechanism.
2. Panditrao, V. M.; Sarkate, A. P.; Sangshetti, J. N.; Wakte, P. S.; Shinde, D. B. J.
Braz. Chem. Soc. 2011, 22, 1253.
3. Nakai, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Terada, K.; Oguchi, T.; Yamamoto, M. Yakugaku Zasshi
1987, 107, 294.
4. Isolation of compound 1 and 2: pramipexole free base (1.0 g) was mixed with
Silica gel (5.0 g) and irradiated under
a fluorescent lamp in ambient
atmosphere for 1 week. Then the irradiated mixture was extracted with
MeOH (100 mL). After concentration, the MeOH extract was chromatographed
over silica gel, using CHCl3–Triethylamine–MeOH (9:1:0.5) as eluent to give 1
(147 mg) and 2 (30 mg).
5. Preparation of p-bromophenacylester 1a as single crystal: To a solution of 1
(7 mg) in CH3CN (2 mL) was added 4-bromophenacyl bromide (22 mg) and
triethylamine (0.2 mL), and the mixture was allowed to react overnight at room
temperature. The reaction mixture was evaporated and purified with
preparative TLC (AcOEt as eluent) to give 1a (8 mg). 1a was recrystallized
with n-hexane-AcOEt to afford single crystal of 1a.
6. Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this paper have been
deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre following deposit
number CCDC-865055 for compound 1a. Copies of these data can be obtained,
free of charge on application to the Director. CCDC 12 Union Road, Cambridge
CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: (+44) 1223 336033: of e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.uk).
7. Hydrolysis of 1: 1 (70 mg) was dissolved in 35% HCl (2 mL) and then stirred at
room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated, and purified
with preparative TLC (CHCl3–MeOH (1:1) as eluent, Rf = 0.35) to give 2 (27 mg).
8. Photo-degradation in liquid state: Pramipexole free base (2.0 g) and rosebengal
(0.1 g) were dissolved in MeOH (500 mL). The mixture was irradiated with
bubbling oxygen under fluorescent lamp for 6 h. Then the reaction mixture was
concentrated, and chromatographed over silica gel, using AcOEt–MeOH (9:1 to
8:2) as eluent to give 3 (455 mg) and 4 (129 mg).
Acknowledgments
We thank the late Professor M. Nishizawa and Professor H.
Imagawa (Tokushima Bunri University) for X-ray analysis, Profes-
sor T. Honda (Hoshi Pharmaceutical University) and Professor K.
Mizuno, and Professor H. Ikeda (Osaka Prefecture University) for
the valuable discussion of photo-degradation.
9. Hydrolysis of 3:
3 (4.2 g) was reacted with LiOH (1.3 g) in MeOH–H2O
(25 mL:20 mL) for 2 h in an ice bath. The reaction mixture was added to H2O
(100 mL), and then pH was adjusted to 1.0 by adding HCl. The mixture was
shaken with CHCl3 (three times of 100 mL), and concentrated to give 1 (3.6 g).
10. Isolation of 5 and 6: pramipexole free base (1.0 g) and rosebengal (0.05 g) were
dissolved in MeOH (500 mL). The mixture was irradiated with bubbling oxygen
under fluorescent lamp for 1 h. Then the reaction mixture was concentrated,
and chromatographed over silica gel, using n-Hexane–EtOAc (2:1?1:2) as
eluent to give 5 (26 mg) and 6 (1 mg).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
11. Photo-irradiation of 5: 5 (1 mg) and catalytic rosebengal were dissolved in
MeOH (0.7 mL), irradiated under fluorescent lamp for 1 h to afford 3 (1 mg).
12. (a) Wasserman, H. H.; Druckrey, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2440; (b)
Matsuura, T.; Saito, I. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1969, 42, 2973; (c) Wasserman, H. H.;
Vinick, F. J.; Chang, Y. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 7180.
1. (a) Jancic, B.; Medenica, M.; Ivanovic, D.; Malenovic, A. Acta Chim. Slov. 2007, 54,
49; (b) Jancic, B.; Medenica, M.; Ivanovic, D.; Malenovic, A. Chromatographia
2007, 65, 633; (c) Malenovic, A.; Jancic, B.; Vemic, A.; Ivanovic, D. J. AOAC Int.
2010, 93, 1102. Five impurities were described in that article1c as below. In our