W.-H. Hong et al. / Dyes and Pigments 94 (2012) 371e379
373
the center of the structure. The well-known intramolecular charge
transfer (ICT) phenomenon, which is concerned with the donor-
acceptor dipole moment exchange, should therefore be taken into
account. This means that the dipole moment exchange, before and
after chelating metal, would be the criteria to judge spectral
diversity and in most of cases would be similar to protonation of the
chelator. This is why most literatures reports (in Refs. [14e24])
mimic or predict the spectra diversity of a metal-fluorophore
complex through protonation of the free fluorophore. In
summary, we wish to ascertain whether ESIPT or ICT is the domi-
nant factor in the design of a good metal chelator. Thus, the
establishment of a metal screening platform in this manuscript
included: (i) range determination of neutral structure (chelator)
form [27,33]; (ii) solvent effect determination of free form and
protonated form to check ICT variation; (iii) metal screening in
optimal conditions based on results from (i) and (ii); and (iv) metal
screening in under semi-aqueous or aqueous buffer systems to
study the possibility of cellular application.
protonated forms of compounds I and II in variable organic solvents
are presented in Fig. 2 (results of compounds III and IV are pre-
sented in Fig. S1). Regardless of the neutral or acidic condition, the
absorption changes of both compounds I and II were insensitive to
solvent polarity. These results clearly point toward a largely non-
polar character for the ground state. However, the apparent red
shift in the absorption maximum (la max) of II under acidic condi-
tions could be due to protonation of the pyridine moiety, increasing
donor-accept effects. It is thus necessary and reasonable that the
protonated behavior of pyridine should be taken into consideration
since this functional group may be involved in the mechanism of
metal chelation. On the other hand, considerable solvent effects in
the fluorescence maximum (lf max) were observed in all cases. This
hinted there was more polar character of excited states, which
might have predominantly come from the ESIPT of DS derivatives.
For applicable fluorescent sensors, colorful exchange and/or signal
enhancement are required once they bind to their targets. Here, the
solvent effect results in Fig. 2 were evaluated based on the criteria
of apparent fluorescent enhancements. Compound I in DMF and
MeOH and compound II in DMSO, MeOH and MeCN showed special
emission enhancements, so these solvents were initially selected
for the metal-chelating assay.
3.2. Basic spectroscopic properties and species distribution
diagrams
Further information regarding the dipole moment exchange
between neutral and protonated compounds were previously
collected [34]. In this study, the plots of ET(30) vs. Stokes shifts for
these solvents are presented in Fig. 3 with a focus on the slope
difference between neutral and protonated compounds. In an
overall observation of the plots, unlike control compounds III and
IV, whose ICT behaviors were definite and had no apparent
difference between neutral and acidic environments, the plots of
compounds I and II showed apparent and irregular differences
between their neutral and protonated forms. Here, the deviations
of the linear correlations were inferred due to (i) the phenol group
of the DS moiety causing intramolecular hydrogen bonding
(compounds I and II), demanding that the ESIPT effect should be
counted; (ii) the pyridine group causing intermolecular hydrogen
bonding (compound II). Hence, once the compound chelated with
metals, it was temporally assumed that the spectral changes of I
was the result of ESIPT effects, while II was the result of ICT and
ESIPT effects.
The UVevisible absorption and fluorescence spectra of the
obtained compounds were measured in DMSO and their optical
data are presented in Table 1. Basically, the absorption energies of
these compounds were located in the ultraviolet region with low
quantum yields. On the other hand, the metal binding process is
usually disturbed by protonation of fluorophore, so it is necessary
to consider the pH effect and find optimal sensing conditions. In
other words, protonation spectra of the chelator moiety in a variety
of solvents might predict or mimic the spectra diversity of this
compound with respect to solvent environment once bound to
ions. Thus, we investigated the spectra responses of compounds
toward pH in H2O/MeOH (3:1) in advance to search for their fluo-
rescent “turned on” states. Based on titration, spectrum deconvo-
lution is important to find the distribution diagram of the neutral
species actually playing the role of chelator. Fig. 1 shows the species
distribution diagram for
a system containing a solution of
compounds I and II upon pH titration. L represents the neutral
compound while deprotonation (protonation) of phenol (Schiff
bases, vinylpyridine) is identified with pKa (pKb) value (Table 1).
3.4. Metal screening
3.3. Solvent effect and fluorescent enhancement of the protonated
compound to mimic metal-chelating spectra
To obtain a quantitative insight into the metal affinity of our
fluorophore candidates, the wavelength changes upon complexa-
tion of various metal ions were determined. The solvent systems
used were compound-dependent due to the criteria from solvent
effects (Fig. 2) and the cation recognition behaviors of compounds
were evaluated from changes in fluorescence intensities upon
addition of metal-containing solutions (the final concentration of
As mentioned above, protonation spectra of the chelator moiety
in various solvents might predict or mimic the spectra diversity of
a compound once binding to metal cations is complete. The
UVevisible absorption and fluorescence spectra of the neutral and
metal in the system was 400
mM). It must be pointed out that it is
Table 1
difficult to maintain the pH conditions of organic solvents, since
most of these metal salts are acidic when dissolved in aqueous
solution. Thus, the control assay was necessary to exclude the
protonation effects from metal salts. For example, Fig. 4a shows the
spectra changes of compound I upon addition of various metal ions
in DMF. In a preliminary analysis of the fluorescence spectra results,
most of metal ions were possibly responsive to I. Following the
criterion of the protonated I (IeHD) curve in Fig. 4a, however, it was
reasonable to assume that compound I chelated Zn2þ and Agþ in
the DMF system. In contrast, control compound III, with the
hydroxyl group absent, revealed no such significant change for any
metal in the fluorescence spectrum under the same conditions. This
revealed the importance of the hydroxyl group for chelation and
showed that the phenol form was responsible for the binding of
Photophysical properties of compounds I and II. Absorption (labs, nm) and emission
(
lem, nm) maxima data were measured from DMSO solution; NMR data (chemical
shift, ppm) were measured from DMSO-d6; pKa and pKb values were determined
from H2O/MeOH (3:1) solutions.
labs
(
3 )
lem
(
Ff)
1H NMR
pKa, pKb
pKa1
ArCH]N
AreOH
pKb1
pKb2
I
II
III
IV
318 (3.74)
325 (3.27)
318 (3.90)
321 (2.99)
420 (0.04)
433 (0.02)
425 (0.10)
390 (0.06)
8.549
8.556
8.632
8.639
13.703
13.398
10.20
9.59
5.10
5.33
5.42
5.51
e
4.70
4.52
labs: absorption maximum (nm);
emission maximum (nm); Ff: quantum yield (quinine sulfate, excitation 350 nm,
3
: extinction coefficient (ꢀ104, Mꢂ1 cmꢂ1); lem
:
F
¼ 0.58 as standard); pKa: deprotonation of phenol; pKb1: protonation of Schiff
base; pKb2: protonation of vinylpyridine.