Please do not adjust margins
New Journal of Chemistry
Page 6 of 9
DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ02712E
ARTICLE
Journal Name
group, which restricts the a-PeT process to the coumarin core and
hence fluorescence could be restored.
References
1. (a)E. Jameel,T. Umar,J. Kumar, N. Hoda, Chem. Biol. Drug. Des.,
2016, 87, 21-38. b) D. K. Mercer, R. Jennifer, W. Kristine, M.
Lorna, S. Shane, C. S. Stewart, D. A. O’Neil, PLoS One., 2013,
8 ,
1-7.
2. (a) O.Kayser, H. Kolodziej, Z. Naturforsch., 1999, 54c, 169–174.
(b) R.C. Sharma, R. K. Parashar, J. Inorg. Bioche.,1988, 32, 163-
169. (c)Y. L. Garazd, E. M. Kornienko, L. N. Maloshtan, M. M.
Garazd, V.P. Khilya,Chem. Nat. Prod., 2005, 41, 508-512.
3. a) J. A. Burlison,L. Neckers, A. B. Smith, A. Maxwell, B. S. J.
Blagg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,128, 15529-15536. b) M. A.
The drug likeness of final click products were calculated using
molinspiration
property
calculation
service
Table S1 in the Supporting Information. Drug-likeness of molecules
mainly depends on their molecular size, lipophilicity (logP), polarity
(assessed by the polar surface area, tPSA), and the presence of
optimal number of rotatable bonds.27 Drug like molecules usually
have logP values in between -0.4 and 5.6.28 Compounds with
molecular weight between 160 and 480 with tPSA between 75 and
150 Å2 are considered as orally bioavailable.29 Most of the
compounds have logP value in between 1.99 and 3.27 and their
molecular weights are in between 417 and 597. It was reported
that most of the anti-inflammatory, anti-depressant, anti-psychotic,
hypnotic, anti-infective and anti-cancer drug molecules have LogP
values between 1 and 3.This suggests the potential of these new
click-on dyes as lead scaffolds for drug classes mentioned above. As
a proof of concept, we have evaluated the cytotoxicity of a
representative compound TC1 against human breast cancer cell line
(MCF-7) by using standard 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-
diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.30 Fifty percentage of cell
death, which determines the inhibitory concentration (IC50) value
Musa, S. C. John, M. O. F. Khan, Curr Med Chem., 2008, 15
,
2664–2679.
4. a) E. B. B. Ong, N. Watanabe, A. Saito, Y. Futamura , K. H. A. Galil
, A. Koito, N. Najimudin , H. Osada, VipirininJ. Biol. Chem., 2011,
286, 14049 –14056. b) S. B. Choi, Y. S. Choong, A. Saito, H. A.
Wahab, N. Najimudin, N. Watanabe, H. Osada, E. B. B. Ong, Mol.
Inf., 2014, 33, 742 – 748.
5. T. Ueno, T. Nagano, Nat. Methods, 2011, 8,642-645.
6. a) K. R. Gee, W. C. Sun, M. K. Bhalgat, R. H. Upson, D. H.
Klaubert, K. A. Latham, R. P. Haugland, Anal. Biochem., 1999,
273, 41–48. b) H. B. Bosmann, T. C. Hall, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,
1974, 71, 1833-1837.
7. K.F. Chilvers, J.D. Perry, A. L. James, R.H. Reed, Appl. Microbiol.,
2001, 91, 1118-1130.
8. a) K. P. Carter, A. M. Young, A. E. Palmer, Chem. Rev, 2014, 114
,
4564−4601. b) T. Nagano, Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B., 2010, 86, 837-
847.
9. a) H.C. Kolb, M.G.Finn, K.B. Sharpless, Angew.Chem Int. Ed.,
2001, 40, 2004–2021. b) K.M. Sreeman, M.G. Finn, Chem.Soc.
Rev., 2010, 39, 1252–1261. c) V. Ganesh, S. Sudhir,T. Kundu, S.
Chandrasekharan,Chem Asian J., 2011,
6, 2670–2694. d) K.
of TC1 against MCF-7 cells holds at 30 µM in 48
h (see
Ladomenou, V. Nikolaou,G.Charalambidis,A.G. Coutsolelos,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2016, 306, 1–42. e) Chen Xi et al., Chem.
Rev., 2016, 116, 3086–3240. f) M. Meldal,C.W.Tornoe, Chem.
Rev., 2008, 108, 2952–3015. g) C.J. Hawkeret.al, Chem. Rev.,
2009, 109, 5620–5686. h) K. Kacprzak, I. Skiera,M. Piasecka, Z.
Paryzek, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 5689–5743. i) P. Thirumurugan,
D. Matosiuk, K. Jozwiak, Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 4905–4979.
10. a) D. B. Ramachary, K. Ramakumar, V.V.Narayana, Chem.Eur. J.,
2008, 14, 9143–9147. b)M.Belkheira, D.E. Abed, J.M. Pons, C.
Bressy,Chem.Eur. J., 2011, 17, 12917–12921. c) L.J.T. Danence
,Y. Gao M. Li, Y. Huang, J. Wang, ChemEur J., 2011, 17, 3584–
3587. d) L. Wang,S.Peng,L.J.T.Danence,Y.Gao, J. Wang, ChemEur
J., 2012, 18, 6088–6093. e) N. Seus, L.C. Goncalves, A.M.
Deobald, L. Savegnago, D. Alves, M.W. Paixao, Tetrahedron.,
2012, 68, 10456–10463. f) D.B. Ramachary, A.B. Shashank,
Chem.Eur J., 2013, 19, 13175–13181. g) W. Li, Q. Jia, Z. Du, J.
Wang, Chem.Commun.,2013, 49, 10187–10189. h) D.K.J. Yeung,
T. Gao, J. Huang, S. Sun,H.Guo, J. Wang, Green Chem.,
2013,15,2384–2388. i) N. Seus,B.Goldani, E.J.Lenardão, L.
Savegnago, M.W. Paixão, D. Alves, Eur.J.Org. Chem., 2014,
1059–1065. j) W. Li, Z. Du, J. Huang,Q.Jia,K. Zhang, J. Wang,
Green Chem., 2014, 16, 3003–3006. k) W. Li, Z. Du, K. Zhang, J.
Wang,Green Chem., 2015, 17, 781–784. l) Q. Jia, G. Yang,
L.Chen,Eur.J.Org.Chem, 2015, 3435–3440. m)X.Xu, Z. Shi, W. Li,
New J Chem., 2016, 40, 6559–6563.
supplementary Information for cytotoxicity evaluation details).
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have designed
activatablecoumarin fluorescent inhibitors and probes by the
triazole derivatization of azidomethylcoumarin4-AMU 4-AMU
a
series of CuAAC-
.
showed little fluorescence (Φfl= 0.14) before click reaction.
However, upon triazole formation with various alkynes, a strong
fluorescence is induced with excellent enhancement of
fluorescence quantum yield at a long excitation wavelength above
450 nm. Quantum mechanical calculations indicate that conversion
of azidomethane to the corresponding triazoles results in
a
significant decrease in the electron density and the increase of the
HOMO energy level of the triazole-substituted methyl moiety. This
suggests that the fluorescence enhancement upon CuAAC reaction
is due to the inhibition of an a-PeT process. The cytotoxicity
evaluation results are promising and point to possibilities of these
molecules as potential inhibitors of human breast cancer cell line
MCF-7.
11. a) D. B. Ramachary, A.B. Shashank,S.Karthik, Angew Chem.
2014, 126, 10420–10424. b) A.B. Shashank, S. Karthik, R.
Madhavachary, ChemEur J., 2014, 20, 16877–16881. c) W. Li, J.
Acknowledgements
Wang,Angew Chem., 2014, 126, 14410–14414. d) D. B.
P. Thasnim wishes to thank Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research (CSIR) New Delhi for research fellowship. We are
grateful to CSIR-NIIST Trivandrum, IISER Trivandrum, NIT
Calicut and Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam for
analytical support.
Ramachary, P.M. Krishna,J.Gujral, G.S.Reddy,ChemEur J., 2015,
21, 16775–16780. e) X. Zhou,X.Xu, K. Liu, H. Gao, W. Wang, W.
Li,Eur J Org Chem., 2016, 1886–1890. f) D.B. Ramachary, G.S.
Reddy, S. Peraka,J.Gujral,ChemCatChem. 2017, 9, 263–267. g) D.
B. Ramachary, J.Gujral, S. Peraka, G.S. Reddy, Eur J Org Chem.,
2017, 459–464.
6 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins