Table 2 Photovoltaic properties of the DSSCs made of D-STIF–TCA, 20
and N719 dyesa
nature of the IMS group in dye 5. Apparently, IPCE spectra
show that smaller JSC values of our dyes compared to that of
N719 are due to their poorer light harvesting ability in the
550–750 nm regions.
When compared with the device efficiency for 20, the signi-
ficant improvement of the device performances by 58–62% for
the spirally configured 2–4 strongly supports our molecular design
concept of introducing a confined cis-stilbene core to reduce dye
aggregation with improved conjugation and light harvesting.12
Dye
VOC/mV JSC/mA cmꢀ2 FF
Z (%) DL/nmol cmꢀ2
1
2
3
4
5
677
705
702
697
680
11.2
12.8
12.3
12.2
11.7
14.4
8.3
0.71 5.40
185.7
213.8
204.5
217.5
255.9
158.3
284.1
0.66 5.96
0.70 6.04
0.72 6.12
0.73 5.83
0.70 7.83
0.67 3.77
N719 777
20
678
a
Measured under the standard AM 1.5 G illumination (100 mW cmꢀ2);
Notes and references
the active area is 0.16 cm2 and the thickness of TiO2 films is 16 mm.
1 M. K. Nazeeruddin, A. Kay, L. Rodicio, B. R. Humphry,
E. Muller, P. Liska, N. Vlachopoulos and M. Gratzel, J. Am.
¨
Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 6382.
¨
2 (a) M. Gratzel, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2004, 164, 3;
¨
3 (a) M. K. Nazeeruddin, F. DeAngelis, S. Fantacci, A. Selloni,
¨
(b) B. O’Reagen and M. Gratzel, Nature, 1991, 353, 737.
G. Viscardi, P. Liska, S. Ito, B. Takeru and M. Gratzel, J. Am.
¨
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 16835; (b) Y. Chiba, A. Islam,
Y. Watanabe, R. Komiya, N. Koide and L. Han, Jpn. J. Appl.
Phys., Part 1, 2006, 45, L638.
4 (a) H. Imahori, T. Umeyama and S. Ito, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009,
´ ´
42, 1809; (b) M. V. Martınez-Dıaz, G. de la Torrea and T. Torres,
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7090; (c) M. G. Walter, A. B. Rudine
and C. C. Wamser, J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines, 2010, 14, 759.
5 (a) S. Kim, J. K. Lee, S. O. Kang, J. Ko, J. H. Yum, A. Fantacci,
F. D. Angelis, D. Di Censo, M. K. Nazeeruddin and M. Grazel,
¨
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 16701; (b) M. Xu, S. Wenger, H. Bala,
D. Shi, R. Li, Y. Zhou, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. Gratzel and P. Wang,
¨
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 2966; (c) H. Qin, S. Wenger, M. Xu,
F. Gao, X. Jing, P. Wang, S. M. Zakeeruddin and M. Gratzel, J. Am.
¨
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 9202; (d) Y. Bai, J. Zhang, D. Zhou, Y. Wang,
M. Zhang and P. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 11442;
(e) J. Liu, F. Wang, F. Fabregat-Santiago, S. G. Miralles, X. Jing,
J. Bisquert and P. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 14425.
6 (a) Y. I. Kim and B. A. Gregg, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 2412;
(b) S. Erten-Ela, D. Yilmaz, B. Icli, Y. Dede, S. Icli and E. U. Akkaya,
Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 3299; (c) Y. Shibano, T. Umeyama, Y. Matano
and H. Imahori, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 1971; (d) M. Miyashita,
K. Sunahara, T. Nishikawa, Y. Uemura, N. Koumura, K. Hara,
A. Mori, T. Abe, E. Suzuki and S. Mori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 17874; (e) W. Zeng, Y. Cao, Y. Bai, Y. Wang, Y. Shi, M. Zhang,
F. Wang, C. Pan and P. Wang, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, 1915.
7 (a) C.-T. Chen and I.-C. Chou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 7662;
(b) C.-T. Chen, Y. Wei, J.-S. Lin, M. V. R. K. Moturu,
W.-S. Chao, Y.-T. Tao and C.-H. Chien, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2006, 128, 10992; (c) Y. Wei and C.-T. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2007, 129, 7478; (d) Y. Wei, S. Samori, S. Tojo, M. Fujitsuka,
J. S. Lin, C.-T. Chen and T. Majima, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,
131, 6698; (e) C.-T. Chen, J.-S. Lin, M. Murthy, Y.-T. Tao and
C.-H. Chiang, Chem. Commun., 2005, 3980.
Fig. 4 The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency stacked
spectra for D-STIF–TCA, 20, and N719 based DSSCs.
(VOC) range from 677 to 705 mV (cf. 678 mV for 20 and
777 mV for N719) and the fill factor (FF) falls in the range of
0.66–0.73 (cf. 0.67 for 20 and 0.70 for N719). Notably, all the
device performances of dyes 1–5 are 43–63% better than that of
20 (Z = 3.77%) and reached 75–78% of the N719-based DSSC
(Z = 7.83%) fabricated and measured under similar conditions.
The stacked spectra of incident photon-to-current conversion
efficiency (IPCE) for devices made of D-STIF–TCA, 20 and N719
dyes are shown in Fig. 4. The band onsets of their IPCE plots fall
in the range of 670–690 nm. Notably, their IPCE performances
exceed 66% from 420 to 540 nm in all cases (cf. 53–67% for 20
and 66–75% for N719) except 1 (D = NMePh; 63–66%) and
exhibit the highest values (73–79%) around 490 nm (cf. 66% for
1 and 20 at 490 nm). In comparison with 2, the uniformly lower
IPCE profiles from 350 to 575 nm for 1 and from 350 to 640 nm
for 20, respectively, are responsible for their relatively smaller JSC
and poorer overall photovoltaic performances.
8 (a) A. Abbotto, N. Manfredi, C. Marinzi, F. De Angelis,
E. Mosconi, J.-H. Yum, Z. Xianxi, M. K. Nazeeruddin and
M. Gratzel, Energy Environ. Sci., 2009, 2, 1094; (b) S. Kolemen,
¨
O. A. Bozdemir, Y. Cakmak, G. Barin, S. Erten-Ela, M. Marszalek,
J.-H. Yum, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. K. Nazeeruddin, M. Gratzel and
¨
E. U. Akkaya, Chem. Sci., 2011, 2, 949.
In all cases except 1 and 5, the IPCE values are uniformly
higher than those of N719 by up to 10–20% from 350 to 490 nm.
Because of the limit of light absorption, the IPCE curves of
devices for 1–5 start to drop above 570 nm. The change of
donor group from common NAr2 to IMS group as in 5 led to
slight erosion of its IPCE even though there exists a stronger
absorption band at 455 nm as compared to those for 1–3
(Fig. 1). The amount of dye-loading (DL) of the 5/TiO2 film
was much larger than those of the others, indicating that the
degree of dye aggregation might play a role to reduce the JSC
of the device for 5 as compared to those of the devices for 2–4.
This interpretation is consistent with the rigidity and planar
9 (a) G. Li, K.-J. Jiang, Y.-F. Li, S.-L. Li and L.-M. Yang, J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2008, 112, 11591; (b) J. Heo, J.-W. Oh, H.-I. Ahn,
S.-B. Lee, S.-E. Cho, M.-R. Kim, J.-K. Lee and N. Kim, Synth.
Met., 2010, 160, 2143.
10 (a) S. Hwang, J. H. Lee, C. Park, H. Lee, C. Kim, C. Park,
M.-H. Lee, W. Lee, J. Park, K. Kim, N.-G. Park and C. Kim,
Chem. Commun., 2007, 4887; (b) The power conversion efficiencies
vary from 4.6 to 5.4% based on our own device fabrication and
property measurement; (c) H. Zhou, P. Xue, Y. Zhang, X. Zhao,
J. Jia, X. Zhang, X. Liu and R. Lu, Tetrahedron, 2011, 67, 8477.
11 See ESIw for details.
12 An X-ray crystal structure (with a SQEEZE refinement) of Ph2N-
STIF–FCA indicates slight co-planarity in the confined cis-stilbene
core in view of the dihedral angle of 221 between CQC and
flanking phenyl groups11
.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
4886 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 4884–4886