244 JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2013
2,7,12-Tribromo-5,5,10,10,15,15-hexahexyl-10,15-dihydro-5H-
diindeno[1,2-a:1′,2′-c]fluorine(TrHBr):27,28 Dichloromethane,bromine
(0.6 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of TrH (2.1 g, 2.48 mmol)
in 45 mL over about 15 min. The tail gas was treated with sodium
hydroxide solution .The reaction was stirred overnight and kept in a
dark place. Then, the mixture was poured into saturated sodium thio-
sulfate solution and stirred for 0.5 h to remove the excess of bromine.
The organic phase was collected and dried with anhydrous MgSO4.
After the solvent was removed, the residue was purified by column
chromatography using petroleum ether as eluent to give the white
solid (2.2 g, yield: 81.8%); m.p. 217 °C.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ (ppm): 8.17 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 7.56 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 3H), 7.52 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 2.81–2.88 (m, 6H), 1.98–2.05 (m, 6H), 0.83–0.95 (m,
36H), 0.60–0.64 (m, 18H), 0.43–0.50 (m, 12H). 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3) δ (ppm): 155.9, 144.9, 138.9, 137.6, 129.4, 125.9, 125.5,
121.1, 56.0, 36.8, 31.5, 29.4, 23.9, 22.3, 13.9. MALDI-TOF-MS
(m/z): calcd for C63H87Br3 1080.4, found 1084.8.
Results and discussion
Since unsubstituted truxene is sparingly soluble in common
organic solvents, six hexyl substituents were introduced at the
C5, 10, 15 positions of the truxene core, which cannot only
efficiently enhance the solubility of the target compounds and
alleviate intermolecular interactions in the solid state, but also
might increase the yield and facilitate the purification of the
desired products. The detailed synthesis of the two starbursts,
PYT and PYET, is outlined in Scheme 1. 1-Bromopyrene was
subjected to halogen-lithium exchange with n-BuLi at –78 °C
in THF. The resulting mixture was subsequently reacted with
the isopropoxyboronic acid pinacol ester to achieve the
desired boronic ester 1 (55.8% yield). Compound 2 was syn-
thesised by Sonogashira reaction (86.1% yield) from 1-bromo-
pyrene and trimethylsilylacetylene, followed by elimination of
the protecting group, TMS, by using KOH in THF/CH3OH
solution. A Suzuki coupling reaction was employed between
the tribromide TrHBr and pyrene boronic ester 1 to obtain the
target compounds PYT (>60% yield). Sonogashira coupling
reaction was employed between the pyrene ethyne 2 and tri-
bromide TrHBr to achieve the target compound PYET (>60%
yields). Both the pyrene-functionalised truxenes in this report
were purified by flash column chromatography. They were
characterised by 1H NMR, 13C NMR and matrix-assisted
laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry
and elemental analysis. The results were consistent with the
proposed structures.
5,5,10,10,15,15-Hexahexyl-2,7,12-tri(pyren-1-yl)-10,15-dihydro-
5H-diindeno[1,2-a:1′,2′-c]fluorene (PYT): To a 100 mL flask, com-
pound TrHBr (1.00 g, 0.92 mmol), compound 1 (1.21 g, 3.69 mmol)
and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium (0.22 g, 0.19 mmol) were
added. The flask was degassed and a N2 atmosphere introduced. Then
degassed toluene (45 mL) and aqueous 2.0 M K2CO3 (10 mL) were
injected. The reaction mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 48 h. After it
was cooled to room temperature, the reaction mixture was quenched
with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and extracted twice with
dichloromethane (200 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried
with anhydrous MgSO4. The solvent was removed under reduced
pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using
petroleum ether/dichloromethane (20:1) as eluent to provide the white
1
solid (0.84 g, yield: 63.2%). H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm):
The UV–Vis absorption and photoluminescence spectra of
the two materials were measured both in dilute THF solutions
and in film fabricated by spin-coating (the procedure was as
follows: the THF solution of the materials is dropped onto a
quartz substrate; then, under vacuum the substrate is rotated
for 20 s at the rate of 1000 rpm.), the corresponding data are
summarised in Table 1. In solution absorption spectra, the
onset absorption edge showed a red shift about 22 nm from
PYT to PYET (Fig. 1). This was due to the increase of conju-
gation length, resulting from a more conjugated pyrenyl-ethy-
nyl group at the C2, 7 and 12 position of the truxene moiety in
PYET. Both absorption spectra showed characteristic peaks
of the truxene group (peaks at around 316 nm, which are due
to a truxene-centred π–π* transition).29 The λmax of PYT was
358 nm, which was redshifted in comparison with truxene
because of the increased conjugation length. For PYET,
the new absorption band at 328 nm can be attributed to the
ethynyl-substituted truxene unit.10 The two peaks in the long
wavelength region at 387 nm and 411 nm could be ascribed to
the ethynyl modified conjugated derivative of truxene.2 Both
absorption spectra in film states exhibited redshifts which
implied the existence of intermolecular π–π aggregation in the
solid state.
8.61 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 8.38 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 3H), 8.33 (d, J = 8.0 Hz,
3H), 8.18–8.25 (m, 9H), 8.15 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 6H), 8.03–8.12 (m, 6H),
7.81 (s, 3H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 3.14–3.21 (m, 6H), 2.23–2.30
(m, 6H), 1.26 (s, 9H), 1.06–1.11 (m, 39H), 0.72–0.75 (m, 18H). 13C
NMR(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 153.9, 145.5, 139.6, 139.2, 138.4,
138.2, 131.6, 131.1, 130.6, 128.7, 128.6, 127.8, 127.5, 127.5, 127.5,
126.1, 125.5, 125.2, 125.2, 125.1, 124.8, 124.8, 124.7, 124.7, 56.0,
37.1, 31.6, 29.7, 22.4, 14.1. MALDI-TOF-MS (m/z): calcd for C111H114
1446. 9, found 1446.5. Anal. Calcd: C, 92.07; H, 7.93. Found: C,
92.03; H, 7.79%.
5,5,10,10,15,15-Hexahexyl-2,7,12-tris(pyren-1-ylethynyl)-10,15-
dihydro-5H-diind-eno[1,2-a:1′,2′-c]fluorene (PYET): Compound
TrHBr (1.00 g, 0.92 mmol), compound 2 (0.84 g, 3.69 mmol), tetrak
is(triphenylphosphine) palladium (0.22 g, 0.19 mmol) and cuprous
iodide (35.0 mg) were added to a 150 mL flask. The flask was degassed
and a N2 atmosphere introduced. Then degassed toluene (45 mL) and
diisopropylamine (45 mL) were injected. The reaction mixture was
stirred at 70 °C for 48 h. After it was cooled to room temperature, the
reaction mixture was quenched with saturated sodium bicarbonate
solution and extracted twice with dichloromethane (200 mL). The
combined organic extracts were dried with anhydrous MgSO4.
The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was
purified by column chromatography using petroleum ether/dichloro-
methane(15:1) as eluent to provide the yellow-green solid (0.91 g,
1
yield: 65.1%). H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 8.81 (d, J =
9.2 Hz, 3H), 8.46 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 3H), 8.42 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 3H), 8.32–
8.19 (m, 9H), 8.15–8.05 (m, 6H), 7.83–7.81 (m, J = 6.4 Hz, 6H), 7.62
(s, 3H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 3H), 3.08–3.16 (m, 6H), 2.13–2.21 (m,
6H), 1.24 (s, 9H), 1.04–1.10 (m, 39H), 0.66–0.70 (m, 18H). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 153.9, 146.1, 140.5, 138.2, 132.0, 131.4,
131.3, 131.2, 130.2, 129.7, 128.4, 128.2, 127.3, 126.3, 125.7, 125.7,
125.7, 124.7, 124.7, 124.6, 124.5, 121.4, 118.1, 96.1, 89.2, 56.0, 53.5,
37.1, 31.6, 29.6, 24.1, 22.4, 14.0. MALDI-TOF-MS (m/z): calcd.
for C117H114 1518.9, found 1519.60. Anal. Calcd: C, 92.44; H, 7.56.
Found: C, 92.28; H, 7.64%.
For the solution emission spectra in dilute THF solutions,
PYT and PYET behaved differently. PYT had a maximum
emission at 410 nm, while PYET displayed a well-structured
emission band with two characteristic peaks at 421 nm and
441 nm. The difference between them could be ascribed to the
acetylenic bond, which might lead to new energy levels. In the
solid state emission, both the materials are red-shifted about
50 nm and the emission bands are broad and structureless,
Table 1 Photophysical properties of PYT and PYET
Molecules
λabs,max/nm
Solution
λem,max/nm
Solution
∆E/eV (abs. edge/nm)
HOMO/eV
LUMO/eVa
film
film
PYT
PYET
356
411
358
417
410
421,441
462
494
2.93
2.88
–5.74
–5.75
–2.81
–2.87
a LUMO = HOMO–∆E (solution state band gap)