directly linked chlorins via oxidative coupling and the
effect of the electronic interaction of the most closely
connected units has never been explored.
cation, produced via SET oxidation, coupled itself to form
the dimer.8ꢀ10 Compared to porphyrin, chlorin has a
similar conjugation path and redox properties; however,
one pyrrole ring is reduced to a pyrroline ring (Scheme 1).
Therefore, we infer that a similar oxidative coupling reac-
tion of chlorin would be realized if the oxidation of the
pyrroline ring could be avoided. In this paper, we report an
oxidative coupling method for the synthesis of a directly
linked chlorin dimer by treating Zn(II) chlorin with PIFA
in 74% yield. This coupling reaction shows high regios-
electivity at the meso-bridge position 20 in the vicinity of
the pyrroline ring over the meso-bridge position 10.
Scheme 1. Conjugation Pathway of Porphyrin and Chlorin
Scheme 2. Oxidative Reaction of Metal Chlorins
Recently, hypervalent iodine(III) reagents, such as
phenyliodine diacetate (PIDA) and phenyliodine bis-
(trifluoroacetate) (PIFA), have been widely applied as safe
and useful nonmetal oxidants in many organic reactions
for their high reactivities and selectivities.6 The coupling
reactions of a metalloporphyrin monomer which has a
meso-H can be easily and efficiently promoted by hyper-
valent iodine(III).2e This synthesis strategy has also been
used, in our group, to achieve the synthesis of chiral
diporphyrins and fused diporphyrins.7 The mechanism
for porphyrin to carry out such a reaction was previously
widely considered as involving single electron transfer
(SET) oxidation. It was thought that the porphyrin radical
Table 1. Yields of the Oxidative Reaction of Metal Chlorins
(5) (a) Pandey, R. K.; Dougherty, T. J. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 2042. (b)
Pandey, R. K.; Smith, K. M.; Dougherty, T. J. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33,
2032. (c) Jaquinod, L.; Nurco, D. J.; Medforth, C. J.; Pandey, R. K.;
Forsyth, T. P.; Olmstead, M. M.; Smith, K. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1996, 35, 1013. (d) Jaquinod, L.; Senge, M. O.; Pandey, R. K.;
Forsyth, T. P.; Smith, K. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1840.
(e) Johnson, C. K.; Dolphin, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4753. (f)
Kozyrev, A. N.; Zheng, G.; Shibata, M.; Alderfer, J. L.; Dougherty,
T. J.; Pandey, R. K. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1193. (g) Li, G.; Dobhal, M. P.;
Graham, A.; Shibata, M.; Zheng, G.; Kozyrev, A.; Pandey, R. K. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 3762. (h) Konekamp, T.; Ruiz, A.; Duwenhorst, J.;
Schmidt, W.; Borrmann, T.; Stohrer, W. D.; Montforts, F. P. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2007, 13, 6595. (i) Tanaka, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Osuka, A. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2008, 14, 204. (j) Nieves-Bernier, E. J.; Diers, J. R.; Taniguchi,
M.; Holten, D.; Bocian, D. F.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75,
3193.
yield/%a
entry
reactant
DDQb
PIDAc
PIFAc
1
2
3
4
5
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
80 (3a)
50 (3b)
48 (3c)
30 (3d)
78 (3e)
N.R.
N.R.
35 (2b)
N.R.
74 (2b)
58 (3c)
54 (3d)
66 (3e)
N.R.
N.R.
a Isolated yield of 2b and 3aꢀe. b The amount of added oxidant was
1.0 equiv. c The amount of added oxidant was 0.5 equiv.
(6) For selective leading reviews, see: (a) Stang, P. J.; Zhdankin, V. V.
Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1123. (b) Kita, Y.; Takada, T.; Tohma, H. Pure
Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 627. (c) Zhdankin, V. V.; Stang, P. J. Chem. Rev.
2002, 102, 2523. (d) Wirth, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3656. (e)
Moriarty, R. M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2893. (f) Dohi, T.; Kita, Y.
Chem. Commun. 2009, 2073.
(7) (a) Ouyang, Q.; Zhu, Y.-Z.; Li, Y.-C.; Wei, H.-B.; Zheng, J.-Y. J.
Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3164. (b) Ouyang, Q.; Zhu, Y.-Z.; Zhang, C.-H.;
Yan, K.-Q.; Li, Y.-C.; Zheng, J.-Y. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5266.
(8) Shen, D.-M.; Liu, C.; Chen, X.-G.; Chen, Q.-Y. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 206–211.
(9) (a) Ogawa, T.; Nishimoto, Y.; Yoshida, N.; Ono, N.; Osuka, A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 176. (b) Kamo, M.; Tsuda, A.;
Nakamura, Y.; Aratani, N.; Furukawa, K.; Kato, T.; Osuka, A. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 2079. (c) Hiroto, S.; Osuka, A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
4054. (d) Sahoo, A. K.; Nakamura, Y.; Aratani, N.; Kim, K. S.; Noh,
S. B.; Shinokubo, H.; Kim, D.; Osuka, A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4141.
(10) (a) Dohi, T.; Morimoto, K.; Kiyono, Y.; Maruyama, A.;
Tohma, H.; Kita, Y. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2930. (b) Dohi, T.;
Morimoto, K.; Maruyama, A.; Kita, Y. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2007. (c) Dohi,
T.; Ito, M.; Iwata, M.; Kita, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1301. (d)
Kar, A.; Mangu, N.; Kaiser, H. M.; Beller, M.; Tse, M. K. Chem. Commun.
2008, 386.
In our experiments, the metal chlorins, prepared via a
streamlined synthesis,11 were treated with the oxidants
DDQ (2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone), PIDA,
and PIFA (Scheme 2). The oxidants were added to a
solution of 1aꢀe in CH2Cl2 under nitrogen. The directly
linked chlorin dimer was only obtained by the reaction of
Zn(II) chlorin with hypervalent iodine(III) reagents (Table
1, entry 2). Pd(II), Cu(II), and Ni(II) chlorins were oxi-
dized by PIFA and DDQ to the respective porphyrin
(58ꢀ66%) and were inert to PIDA. Moveover, the free
base chlorin 1a reacted with DDQ to produce a porphyrin
but was inert to hypervalent iodine(III) reagents. With the
Zn(II) chlorin 2a the oxidative coupling reaction with
(11) (a) Whitlock, H. W., Jr.; Hanauer, R.; Oester, M. Y.; Bower,
B. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 5. (b) Balem, F.; Yanamala, N.; Klein-
Seetharaman, J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2009, 85, 471.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 11, 2012
2747