the color of the solution from light yellow to dark pink and
shifting of absorption maxima up to 85 nm (from 410 to 495 nm)
upon addition of 1 equiv. of Fꢀ ions to 4 (Fig. S15, ESIw).
In conclusion, two novel dithieno-benzo-imidazole-based
compounds M2 and A2 showed remarkable sensitivity towards
Pb2+ over the other metal ions. In the case of M2, the fluorescence
was almost 12-fold enhanced. However, the fluorescence of A2
was quenched almost 10-fold upon titration with Pb2+. Model
compound phenanthrene-benzo-imidazole-based M has almost no
momentous effects during sensing of Pb2+, which indicated the
unique sensitivity of dithieno-benzo-imidazole-based M2 and A2
towards Pb2+ via chelation with ‘S’ and ‘N’ atoms. The quantum
yields and fluorescence lifetime values followed the trend
M1 > A2 > A1 > M2, which was in consistence with their
intramolecular ICT fashion. In the case of M2 and A1, the
obstruction of ICT induced the enhancements of fluorescence
Fig. 4 Fluorescence recovery responses of M2–Pb and A2–Pb upon
titration with 0–0.1 equiv. of S2ꢀ (i.e., 0–1.4 ꢂ 10ꢀ6 M) w.r.t. the
concentration of M2/A2 (1.4 ꢂ 10ꢀ5 M) (M2: lex = 240 nm; A2: lex
=
265 nm).
As shown in Table 1 and Fig. S10(a) (ESIw), A1 showed a
turn-on response during sensing of Pb2+ similar to M2.
However, the sensitivity of A1 (CHEF = 5.2) was lower than
that of M2 (CHEF = 12). This is due to a stronger electron
withdrawing effect of the N+Me3 group than CNꢀ causing less
favourable ICT in A1 than M2.
owing to the binding of a thieno-imidazole unit to Pb2+
.
However, the quencher-induced aggregation played a major
role in the fluorescence quenching for A2 and M1 due to the
auxiliary binding of NH2 and COONa with Pb2+. Compared
with other anions, trace amounts of S2ꢀ induced reversible
binding effects of Pb2+ with both M2 and A1. Nevertheless,
the reversible binding effects of Pb2+ by adding S2ꢀ were not
observed for M1 and A2 due to stronger binding of Pb2+ with
NH2 and COONa groups, respectively.
Upon complexation of Pb2+ with M1, the fluorescence intensity
was quenched. This can be attributed to the amine group coordi-
nated with the Pb2+ ions to cause further electron-withdrawal and
thus to quench the fluorescence. Binding of the amine group with
metal ions was confirmed by proton NMR titrations (Fig. S11,
ESIw). Upon the addition of 10 equiv. of Pb2+, the amine peak at
5.6 ppm completely disappeared. Peaks at 6.72, 7.48, 7.75 and
7.85 ppm in M1 were shifted to 6.78, 7.55, 7.73 and 7.91 ppm,
respectively. Similar to A2, upon binding to Pb2+, although
ICT was obstructed for M1, the quencher-induced aggregation
played a major role in causing the fluorescence quenching.
The reversibility of PL for M2 upon binding to Pb2+ was
investigated by further addition of different anions, for example
The financial support of this project is provided by the
National Science Council of Taiwan (ROC) through NSC
99-2113-M-009-006-MY2 and National Chiao Tung University
through 97W807.
Notes and references
Clꢀ, HCO3ꢀ, HSO3ꢀ, HSO4ꢀ, Iꢀ, NO3ꢀ, OHꢀ, PO43ꢀ, S2O3
,
2ꢀ
1 (a) F. Teixidor, M. A. Flores, L. Escriche, C. Vinas and J. Casabo,
´
SCNꢀ and S2ꢀ (Fig. S12, ESIw). Among all these anions, the
enhanced PL of the M2–Pb complex was mainly annihilated
upon the addition of a diminutive amount of S2ꢀ (0.1 equiv. w.r.t.
the concentration of M2). A similar result has been obtained for
A1–Pb complex upon the addition of S2ꢀ. Fluorescence titrations,
by the addition of successive aliquots of S2ꢀ to the solutions of
M2–Pb and A1–Pb, are illustrated in Fig. 4a and Fig. S13a
(ESIw), respectively. To confirm the sensitivity of S2ꢀ towards
M2–Pb and A1–Pb complexes, fluorescence signal responses of
solo M2 and A1 towards S2ꢀ in the absence of Pb2+ were
obtained. As shown in Fig. S14a and b (ESIw), very irrelevant
changes in the fluorescence of M2 and A1 were observed upon the
addition of even higher concentrations of S2ꢀ (10 equiv. w.r.t.
stock solutions of M2 and A1). This experiment confirmed the
sensitivity of S2ꢀ towards Pb2+ only in their metal–ligand
complex state. Similarly, the effects of S2ꢀ on M1–Pb and
A2–Pb were tested as depicted in Fig. S13 (b) (ESIw), and
Fig. 4(b), respectively. It was found that the fluorescence of the
mixtures was further quenched upon the addition of S2ꢀ. This
can be attributed to the stronger binding of the NH2 (in M1) and
COOꢀ groups (in A2) to metal ions, which could not be cleaved
by S2ꢀ. The ICT was restored (in M1/A2) due to the breakage of
imidazole ‘N’ and ‘S’ linkages with Pb2+. Moreover, the addi-
tional enhancement of ICT, due to the auxiliary binding of metal
ions to amine/COONa, caused sheer quenching of fluorescence.
Again we observed that compound 4 showed the best
colorimetric and ratiometric sensing ability with Fꢀ via changing
Chem. Commun., 1994, 963; (b) S. Chung, W. Kim, S. B. Park,
I. Yoon, S. S. Lee and D. D. Sung, Chem. Commun., 1997, 965;
(c) K. Kimura, S. Yajima, K. Tatsumi, M. Yokoyama and M. Oue,
Anal. Chem., 2000, 72, 5290; (d) A. Ceresa, A. Radu, S. Peper,
E. Bakker and E. Pretsch, Anal. Chem., 2002, 74, 4027.
2 (a) A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, A. J. M.
Huxley, C. P. McCoy, J. T. Rademacher and T. E. Rice, Chem.
Rev., 1997, 97, 1515; (b) V. Amendola, L. Fabbrizzi, M. Licchelli,
C. Mangano, P. Pallavicini, L. Parodi and A. Poggi, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 1999, 190–192, 649; (c) L. Prodi, F. Bolletta, M. Montalti and
N. Zaccheroni, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000, 205, 59; (d) Q. Zhao,
F. Y. Li and C. H. Huang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3007;
(e) B. Valeur and I. Leray, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000, 205, 3;
(f) A. K. Dwivedi, G. Saikia and P. K. Iyer, J. Mater. Chem.,
2011, 21, 2502; (g) B. Chetia and P. K. Iyer, Tetrahedron Lett., 2008,
49, 94.
3 J. S. Liu-Fu, Lead Poisoning:
A
Century of Discovery
and Rediscovery, in Human Lead Exposure, ed. H. L. Needleman,
Lewis Publishing, Boca Raton, FL, 1992.
4 (a) R. Zhou, B. Li, N. Wu, G. Gao, J. You and J. Lan, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 6668; (b) M. Alfonso, A. T’arraga and
P. Molina, Dalton Trans., 2010, 39, 8637; (c) M. Alfonso,
A. Espinosa, A. T’arraga and P. Molina, Org. Lett., 2011,
13, 2078; (d) M. Alfonso, A. T’arraga and P. Molina, J. Org. Chem.,
2011, 76, 939; (e) Z.-Q. Hu, C.-S. Lin, X.-M. Wang, L. Ding,
C.-L. Cui, S.-F. Liu and H. Y. Lu, Chem. Commun., 2010,
46, 3765; (f) X.-L. Ni, S. Wang, X. Zeng, Z. Tao and T. Yamato,
Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 552.
5 (a) C. Qin, W. Y. Wong and L. Wang, Macromolecules, 2011,
44, 483; (b) C. Qin, Y. Cheng, L. Wang, X. Jing and F. Wang,
Macromolecules, 2008, 41, 7798; (c) M. Dekhtyar, W. Rettig and
W. Weigel, Chem. Phys., 2008, 344, 237.
6 S. Sirilaksanapong, M. Sukwattanasinitt and P. Rashatasakhon,
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 293.
c
5670 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 5668–5670
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012