enamine from acetate directly with organocatalysts is very
difficult. To our knowledge, there has been no report on an
organocatalyzed direct acetate aldol reaction.
phosphonates is a good leaving group,17 the original aldol
product was directly converted to the corresponding
methyl ester 3a in 68% yield via a nucleophilic acyl sub-
stitution reaction using MeOH in the presence of DBU
(Table 1, entry 1).19 The ee value of this product was
determined to be 53% (entry 1). The overall reaction may
be regarded as a formal enantioselective acetate aldol reac-
tion, which is difficult to achieve otherwise.
Previously, we demonstrated that R-keto phosphonates
are excellent electrophiles in organocatalyzed asymmetric
direct aldol reactions.13 Nevertheless, using enolizable
R-keto phosphonates as nucleophiles in chiral amine deri-
vative-catalyzed asymmetric direct aldol reactions has never
been reported because the labile and bulky phosphonate
group in these compounds prevents the formation of the
desired enamine intermediates. Most recently, we realized a
base-catalyzed stereoselective aldol14 reaction of unacti-
vated ketones.15 These reactions only involve the formation
of the ketone enolate as the nucleophile in a complete
noncovalent catalysis.14,15 Because no enamine formation
is involved in the mechanisms, we envisioned that substrates
with a labile and/or poor electrophilic ketone group may
still be used in this reaction as nucleophiles. Since the
R-hydrogen in acetylphosphonates (1) should be more
acidic than that of an unactivated ketone, we hypothesized
that a base-catalyzed enantioselective aldol reaction of
acetylphosphonates should be feasible. Herein, we report
the first successful application of the enolizable acetyl-
phosphonates (1) as a nucleophile in an organocata-
lyzed aldol reaction. More importantly, taking advantage
of the lability of the R-keto phosphonate group,16 com-
pound 1 was successfully employed as a surrogate of acetate
or acetamide17 to achieve a convenient, one-pot, highly
enantioselective formal acetate/acetamide aldol reaction.
Isatin (2a, R1 = H) was chosen as the model substrate
to test our hypothesis. On the basis of the results of our
previous study,14 cinchona alkaloid derivatives18 were
chosen as the catalysts (Figure 1). The results of the
catalystscreening are summarizedin Table1. Asthe results
show (Table 1), with the quinidine thiourea catalyst 4a, the
desired aldol product was obtained when diethyl acetyl-
phosphonate 1a and 2a were reacted in THF at rt for 4 h
(Table 1, entry 1). Since the phosphonate group in R-keto
The effects of the ester group (R2) of the acetylpho-
sphonate were then investigated. It was found that,
although dimethyl acetylphosphonate 1b led to a slightly
higher ee value of the product (62% ee, entry 2), the yield
was much poorer (39%). In contrast, diisopropyl acetyl-
phosphonate 1c led to an excellent yield (91%) of the
expected product 3a with the same ee value (entry 3) as that
of diethyl acetylphosphonate (entry 1). Therefore, 1c was
adopted as the model substrate for catalyst screening. As
the results in Table 1 show, except for catalysts 4g and 4h,
all the other cinchona alkaloid catalysts led to the forma-
tion of 3a in good to high yields (entries 4À12). High ee
values wereachieved for the quinidine thiourea catalysts4b
(75% ee, entry 4) and 4c (72% ee, entry 5), and 9-O-
(1-naphthylmethyl)cupreidine (4j, 73% ee, entry 12). In
contrast, proline-based catalysts 4k and 4l failed to gen-
erate the desired product from acetylphosphonate 1c
(entries 13 and 14). These results clearly demonstrate the
advantages of the enolate mechanism over the enamine
mechanism for such bulky and labile ketone substrates. A
solvent study with catalyst 4b revealed that THF is the best
solvent for this reaction.20 A lower reaction temperature
was found to be beneficial for improving the enantioselec-
tivity of this reaction (entries 15 and 16), and the ee value of
(13) (a) Samanta, S.; Zhao, C.-G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7442.
(b) Dodda, R.; Zhao, C.-G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4911. (c) Mandal, T.;
Samanta, S.; Zhao, C.-G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9 (943), 16. (d) Samanta, S.;
Perera, S.; Zhao, C.-G. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1101. (e) Perera, S.;
Naganaboina, V. K.; Wang, L.; Zhang, B.; Guo., Q.; Rout., L.; Zhao,
C.-G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 1729.
(14) Guo, Q.; Bhanushali, M.; Zhao, C.-G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2010, 49, 9460. See also ref 15b for a similar study.
(15) For related examples, see: (a) Paradowska, J.; Rogozinnska, M.;
ꢀ
Mlynarski, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1639. (b) Allu, S.; Molleti, N.;
Panem, R.; Singh, V. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 4080. (c) Li, L.;
Klauber, E. G.; Seidel, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12248.
(d) Misaki, T.; Takimoto, G.; Sugimura, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 6286. (e) Liu, G.-G.; Zhao, H.; Lan, Y.-B.; Wu, B.; Huang, X.-F.;
Chen, J.; Tao, J.-C.; Wang, X.-W. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 3843.
(16) For examples, see: (a) Maeda, H.; Takahashi, K.; Ohmori, H.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 12233. (b) Afarinkia, K.; Twist, A. J.; Yu, H.-w.
J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 2688. (c) Afarinkia, K.; Twist, A. J.; Yu,
H.-w. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6500.
(17) For an example of using acylphosphonate as a surrogate of esters
and amides in an enantioselective Michael addition reaction, see: Jiang,
H.; Paixao, M. W.; Monge, D.; Jorgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 2775.
(18) These catalysts were prepared according to the reported proce-
ꢀ
ꢀ
dures, see: (a) Vakulya, B.; Varga, S.; Csampai, A.; Soos, T. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 1967. (b) Wu, W.; Min, L.; Zhu, L.; Lee, C.-S. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2011, 353, 1135. (c) Amere, M.; Lasne, M.-C.; Rouden J. Org. Chem.
2007, 9, 2621. (d) Wang, H.-F.; Cui, H.-F.; Chai, Z.; Li, P.; Zheng,
C.-W.; Yang, Y.-Q.; Zhao, G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 13299–13303.
(e) Denis, J.-B.; Masson, G.; Retailleau, P.; Zhu, J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 5356.
(19) This also facilitates the isolation and purification of the reaction
product.
(20) The product was obtained in 74% ee in dioxane, while lower ee
values were obtained in DME, ether, CH2Cl2, EtOAC, and MeCN. Only
a trace amount of the product was obtained when MeOH was used.
Figure 1. Catalysts screened in the aldol reaction (Nap = naphthyl).
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 12, 2012
3175