Scheme 2 Asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of a simple ketone
(4-methoxyacetophenone).
studies noting the base-sensitivity of mesoporous materials,
the mesostructure of this material was highly maintained after
being subjected to a solution of basic isopropyl alcohol at high
temperature for an extended time (Table S-1, entry 5, ESIw).15
In conclusion, BINAP and biphenylene-bridged hybrid
periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PMOs) were synthesized by
co-condensation of a novel 5,50-bistriethoxysilyl BINAP monomer
with 4,40-bistriethoxysilylbiphenyl, templated by Brij76 surfactant
under acidic conditions. The resulting PMOs had well ordered
mesopores and crystal-like local alignment of the organic groups
within the walls. Since the chiral BINAP unit was polymerized via
rigid linkers at the 5,50 positions, which is off the axis of chirality,
the potential existed for detrimental effects on the bite angle of the
ligand. However, no negative effects on asymmetric catalysis were
observed for two different hydrogenation reactions. Further studies
to apply this material to other catalytic reactions are in progress.
Fig. 2 TEM images of Ru doped 5%(R)-BINAP-PMO.
Table 2 Asymmetric catalytic hydrogenation under high-pressure
hydrogen gas
Entry
R1, R2
Yield [%]a
e.e. [%]b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7c
Me, Me
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Me. Et
Et, Me
Me, iPr
Me, 4-MeOPh
Me, Me
b
Ru/5%(R)-BINAP-PMO was employed.a Isolated yield. Determined
by supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) using CHIRALPAK OD-H
column with 1B20% MeOH additive at 50 1C, 2 mL minꢀ1, 200 bar.
Notes and references
Homogeneous Ru/BINAP was employed under the same conditions.11
c
1 F. Hoffman, M. Cornelius, J. Morell and M. Froba, Angew. Chem.,
¨
Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 3216; Y. Wan and D. Zhao, Chem. Rev., 2007,
107, 2821; S. Fujita and S. Inagaki, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 891.
2 M. P. Kapoor, Q. Yang and S. Inagaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002,
124, 15176; A. R. McDonald, C. Muller, D. Vogt, G. P. M. van Klinka
and G. van Koten, Green Chem., 2008, 10, 424.
3 S. Inagaki, S. Guan, Y. Fukushima, T. Ohsuna and O. Terasaki, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 9611; B. J. Melde, B. T. Holland, C. F. Blanford
and A. Stein, Chem. Mater., 1999, 11, 3302; T. Asefa, M. J.
MacLachlan, N. Coombs and G. A. Ozin, Nature, 1999, 402, 867.
4 X. Wu, T. Blackburn, J. D. Webb and C. M. Crudden, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8059.
the polymerization points, we were concerned that the twist angle
could be distorted upon inclusion of the ligand in the material.
Since the twist angle controls the bite angle of the two phosphane
units, and affects the transmission of chirality, it is possible that the
BINAP-PMO will give different results compared to the solution
catalyst, which is free to adopt the most favourable conformation
around the central atropisomeric axis. Despite these concerns, our
PMO catalyst was exceptionally reactive, giving the expected
products in excellent yields and stereoselectivities, consistent with
solution results for monomeric binap-based catalysts (Table 2).
Since this is not often the case for supported catalysts, these results
validate our approach to the design of novel catalytically active
PMOs. Additionally, no differences in reactivity were observed
relative to the size of the substrates employed, at least for typical
substrates, indicating that the mesoporosity permits facile access to
the active sites (entries 1–6). Furthermore, since the catalyst is
completely heterogeneous, recycling of the catalyst was easily
carried out by a quick centrifugation followed by taking the
supernatant out then addition of a fresh substrate solution
(entry 2). Another notable advantage from this heterogeneity is
that a simple filtration is sufficient to purify the organic products.
Importantly, analysis of the recovered PMOs indicated that the
mesoporosity was maintained even after the treatment under high-
pressures of hydrogen (Table S-1, entry 4, ESIw).
5 R. H. Baney, M. Itoh, A. Sakakibara and T. Suzuki, Chem. Rev.,
1995, 95, 1409.
6 Y. Yang and A. Sayari, Chem. Mater., 2007, 19, 4117.
7 S. MacQuarrie, M. P. Thompson, A. Blanc, N. J. Mosey, R. P.
Lemieux and C. M. Crudden, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 14099.
8 Q. Yang, J. Liu, L. Zhang and C. Li, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 1945;
W. Wang, J. E. Lofgreen and G. A. Ozin, Small, 2010, 6, 2634;
N. Mizoshita, T. Tani and S. Inagaki, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 789.
9 R. Noyori, T. Ohkuma, M. Kitamura, H. Takaya, N. Sayo,
H. Kumobayashi and S. Akutagawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987,
109, 5856; T. Ohkuma, H. Ooka, S. Hashiguchi, T. Ikariya and
R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 2676.
10 E. Framery, B. Andrioletti and M. Lemaire, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
2010, 21, 1110; Q.-H. Fan, Y.-M. Li and A. S. C. Chan, Chem. Rev.,
2002, 102, 3385.
11 P. Wang, X. Liu, J. Yang, Y. Yang, L. Zhang, Q. Yang and C. Li,
J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 8009; Also reported BINOL-incorporated
chiral PMO catalyst; X. Liu, P. Wang, Y. Yang, P. Wang and
Q. Yang, Chem.–Asian J., 2010, 5, 1232.
12 T. Hayashi, S. Hirate, K. Kitayama, H. Tsuji, A. Torii and
Y. Uozumi, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 1441.
Finally, we also employed the PMO catalyst in a ruthenium-
catalyzed transfer hydrogenation (Scheme 2). Although it is still
necessary to add a soluble chiral diamine to give the product
stereoselectively, the hydrogenated product was obtained in
excellent yield, and enantioselectivity. Compared to previous
13 H.-C. Wu, J.-Q. Yu and J. B. Spencer, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 4675.
14 K. Mashima, K. Kusano, N. Sato, Y. Matshumura, K. Nozaki,
H. Kumobayashi, N. Sayo, Y. Hori, T. Ishizaki, S. Akutagawa and
H. Takaya, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 3064.
15 B. W. Glasspoole, J. D. Webb and C. M. Crudden, J. Catal., 2009,
265, 148.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6369–6371 6371