The proposed arylation of compound 7a was initially
attempted with copper chloride and copper acetate in the
presence of sodium tert-butoxide in DMF at 110 °C under
argon6a or under air6b as reported in the literature (Table 1,
entries 1ꢀ4). Unfortunately, these reaction conditions
afforded no desired product, with starting material being
recovered. We next attempted copper(I) iodide in combi-
nation with a number of bases. To our delight, copper(I)
iodide was found to effect the transformation in the
presence of lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide. After some
experimentation, the optimal reaction conditions were
established, and this transformation could be effected in
only a catalytic amount (10%) of CuI (Table 1, entry 6) to
afford the C3a-S and C3a-R products as an inseparable
mixture of diastereoisomers. To the best of our knowledge,
this is the first example of copper-catalyzed intramolecular
arylationꢀalkylation of an o-bromoanilide, a cost-effec-
tive process for the asymmetric synthesis of oxindoles
bearing a C3a all-carbon quaternary center.7
Scheme 3. Further Experiments for Copper-Catalyzed Aryla-
tion of o-Bromoanilide
In order to get some insight toward this copper-cata-
lyzed process, we carried out the reaction with a number
of o-bromoanilides (7bꢀg, Scheme 3). Arylation of o-
bromoanilides (7bꢀd) without the neighboring tert-butane-
sulfinamide unit did not yield the desired arylationꢀ
alkylation products. It was noteworthy that substrates 7e
and 7f bearing a carbamate group underwent the arylation
efficiently in the presence of copper(I) iodide and unpre-
cedentedly led to spiro-oxindoles 14 and 15 in excellent
yields. The remote aza-assistance of a tert-butanesulfina-
mide or a carbamate unit was critical to this copper-catalyzed
arylation. Arylation of the optically active substrate 7g
(derived from L-glutamic acid) provided spirooxindole 16
in high yield with excellent diastereoselectivity (Scheme 3,
16, dr >99:1, based on NMR). Attempts made to isolate
the arylation intermediate, namely oxindole 8i, were fruit-
less, and a complex mixture was formed after workup, with
the major product being identified as oxindole 8j, an air
oxidized product (similar results see ref 10b).
Although the mechanism for this copper-catalyzed ar-
ylation needs further elaboration,8 we favor the concerted
single-electron-transfer pathway.6 We conducted the reac-
tion in the presence of a radical inhibitor, 2,2-diphenyl-1-
picrylhydrazyl (DPPH, 3.0 equiv),9 as well as p-dinitro-
benzene (5.0 equiv)10 and found that the arylation process
was totally inhibited with starting material being recovered.
To demonstrate the usefulness of our new method, we next
turned to the synthesis of selective butyrylcholinesterase
inhibitor debromoflustramine B11 and antibacterial agent
debromoflustramine E.12Amide 7a was subjected to the
sequential arylationꢀalkylation reaction on a gram scale
under our optimized conditions, and compound 8c was
obtained in 84% yield. Treatment of the key intermediate
8c with HCl in methanol and 1,4-dioxane provided amine
17 (C3aS/C3aR = 6:1). Formation of the HPI ring with a
reductive amination and deprotection of the benzyl group
with a Birch reduction afforded debromoflustramine E
(7) The C3a absolute configurations for 8c and 8d were established by
the total synthesis of (ꢀ)-debromoflustramine B and (ꢀ)-pseudophry-
naminol. (S)-(ꢀ)-tert-butanesulfinamide results in C3a-S configuration,
while (R)-(þ)-tert-butanesulfinamide leads to C3a-R configuration. The
C3a absolute configurations (might require further experiments to
confirm its absolute configurations) for compounds 8a, 8b, and 8eꢀh
were deduced by comparing with the sign of the specific rotations of 8c
and 8d.
(11) For enantioselective syntheses of debromoflustramine B, see: (a)
Bruncko, M.; Crich, D.; Samy, R. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5543. (b)
Cardoso, A. S.; Srinivasan, N.; Lobo, A. M.; Prabhakar, S. Tetrahedron
´
Lett. 2001, 42, 6663. (c) Morales-Rıos, M. S.; Rivera-Becerril, E.;
Joseph-Nathan, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 2493. (d) Cardoso,
A. S. P.; Marques, M. M. B.; Srinivasan, N.; Prabhakara, S.; Lobo,
(8) We proposed
Information.
a working hypotheses in the Supporting
A. M. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 10211. (e) Rivera-Becerril, E.; Joseph-
ꢀ
Nathan, P.; Perez-Alvarez, V. M.; Morales-Rı
ꢀ
´
os, M. S. J. Med. Chem.
(9) Hristea, E. N.; Caproiu, M. T.; Pencu, G.; Hillebrand, M.;
Constantinescu, T.; Balaban, A. T. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2006, 7, 130.
(10) (a) Kornblum, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975, 14, 734. (b)
Fang, C.-L.; Horne, S.; Taylor, N.; Rodrigo, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 9480.
2008, 51, 5271. (f) Trost, B. M.; Zhang, Y. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17,
2916.
(12) (a) Dix, A. V.; Meseck, C. M.; Lowe, A. J.; Mitchell, M. O.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 2522. (b) Miyamoto, H.; Okawa, Y.;
Nakazaki, A.; Kobayashi, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1805.
3118
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 12, 2012