used. Wang et al. had previously reported an Fe(ClO4)3-
mediatedadditionof aldehydesand esterstofullerene.8 We
attempted the reaction using other Lewis acids, oxidants,
and iron complexes (AlCl3, RuCl3, BF3 Et2O, CuCl2,
3
FeCl2, ZnCl2, Fe(acac)3, and Fe(ClO4)3) in place of FeCl3,
but we also could not obtain the desired fullerenyl esters
from their respective carboxylic acids. Therefore, this
reaction was found to be specific for FeCl3 and carboxylic
acids only.
Next, we performed functional group transformations
on the hydroxyl groups of 2a. Electrochemicalstudies of 2a
showed its irreversible reduction/oxidation process due to
the presence of the hydroxyl group. Masking the hydrogen
atom of the hydroxyl group is thus necessary to obtain an
electrochemically stable fullerene-based electron acceptor
for application in OPV devices. Syntheses of fullerene
ethers and esters from fullerenols is generally straight-
forward.5b Treatment of fullerenol 2a with benzoic acid
chloride (5 equiv), in the presence of diethyl amine (5 equiv)
and dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP, 0.1 equiv) in pyridine
at 0 °C for 4 h, produced a diester derivative 3 in 70% yield
(Scheme 1). A siloxyl derivative 4 was also obtained in 87%
yield via the reaction of fullerenol 2a with trimethylsilyl
chloride (20 equiv), in the presence of DMAP (0.1 equiv) in
pyridine at 25 °C for 24 h. Compounds 3 and 4 were
Figure 1. Crystal structure of 2a 0.5CS2. (a) ORTEP drawing
with thermal ellipsoids at 30% probability. (b) Ball-and-stick
model.
3
The scope and limitation of the reaction is illustrated in
Table 1. The reaction was applicable to both aromatic and
aliphatic carboxylic acids, though the latter type gave
lower yields. Nonsubstituted benzoic acid (1b) showed
similar reactivity to 1a (conversion of C60 = 95%), but
comparatively low selectivity, to produce the correspond-
ing fullerenyl ester 2b (14% yield, entry 2). We postulate
that the poor selectivity was caused by the coordination of
FeCl3 to the carbonyl group of the substrate. Another
potential reason for this low yield would be the side
reaction between a possible cationic fullerene intermediate
(vide infra) and nonsubstituted aryl groups. There had
been many reports on reactions of fullerene cations with
aryl groups in literature.5c,6a,6d,7 Monomethylated benzoic
acids 1c, 1d, 1e, gave corresponding fullerenyl esters 2c, 2d,
2e, in chemical yields of 24ꢀ28%. For dimethylated
benzoic acids, 2,4-dimethylbenzoic acid (1f) afforded a
30% yielding reaction, while 3,5-dimethylbenzoic acid
(1g) gave a comparatively lower yield of 22%. 2-Methoxy-
benzoic acid (1h) and 2,6-dimethoxybenzoic acid (1i) did
not produce any fullerenyl ester, most likely due to co-
ordination of FeCl3 to the methoxy groups. 2-Chloroben-
zoic acid (1j) gave the second best result (35% yield), but
2,6-dichlorobenzoic acid (1k) did not yield any fullerenyl
ester at all. Aliphatic carboxylic acids 1l, 1m, 1n reacted
with C60 under the same conditions to produce fullerenyl
esters 2l, 2m, 2n, respectively. Among these three sub-
strates, pivalic acid (1n) gave the lowest yield. The reason
for this result is unclear, but we consider the electronic
nature of the substrates also affects the yield.
1
characterized via H NMR, 13C NMR, IR, ESI-MS, ele-
mental analysis, and X-ray crystallography.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Compounds 3 and 4
Electrochemical studies were performed on 3 and 4 to
determine the LUMO levels of the compounds (Table 2).
Both compounds 3 and 4 exhibited reversible reductive
waves, as observed in the measurements. The first reduc-
tion potential for both 3 and 4 in 1,2-dichlorobenzene was
ꢀ1.11 and ꢀ1.13 V vs Fc/Fcþ. The LUMO level of 3 was
formally calculated to be ꢀ3.69 eV. This value is the same
as that for the LUMO level of C60 (ꢀ3.69 eV, estimated
Attempts to use aldehydes such as benzaldehyde and
esters such as ethyl benzoate, in place of carboxylic acids,
were unsuccessful when similar reaction conditions were
(7) (a) Avent, A. G.; Birkett, P. R.; Crane, J. D.; Darwish, A. D.;
Langley, G. J.; Kroto, H. W.; Taylor, R.; Walton, D. R. M. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1463–1464. (b) Birkett, P. R.; Avent, A. G.;
Darwish, A. D.; Hahn, I.; Kroto, H. W.; Langley, G. J.; O’Loughlin, J.;
Taylor, R.; Walton, D. R. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 1121–
1126. (c) Taylor, R. Synlett 2000, 776–793. (d) Kitagawa, T.; Takeuchi,
K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2001, 74, 785–800. (e) Kitagawa, T.; Lee, Y.;
Hanamura, M.; Sakamoto, H.; Konno, H.; Takeuchi, K.; Komatsu, K.
Chem. Commun. 2002, 3062–3063. (f) Zhang, Y.; Matsuo, Y.; Nakamura,
E. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6058–6061.
(8) (a) Li, F.-B.; Liu, T.-X.; Wang, G.-W. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73,
6417–6420. (b) Li, F.-B.; Liu, T.-X.; You, X.; Wang, G.-W. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 3258–3261. (c) Li, F.-B.; You, X.; Wang, G.-W. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 4896–4899. (d) Li, F.-B.; You, X.; Liu, T.-X.; Wang, G.-W.
Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1800–1803. (e) Li, F.-B.; Zhu, S.-E.; You, X.; Wang,
G.-W. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2012, 57, in press [doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5103-5].
3278
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 13, 2012