6058
H.-D. Chen et al. / Tetrahedron 68 (2012) 6054e6058
(200e300 mesh) (Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co. Ltd.), C18 reverse-
phased silica gel (150e200 mesh, Merck), MCI gel (CHP20P,
where
s is the width of the band at 1/e height and DEi and Ri are the
excitation energies and rotatory strengths for transition i, re-
75e150
m
M, Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Ltd.) were used for col-
spectively. In this work,
s¼0.15 eV was used.
umn chromatography. All solvents used were of analytical grade
(Shanghai Chemical Plant, Shanghai, PR China).
4.5. Bioassay
Cells were incubated with 300 mM H2O2, and the cultures were
4.2. Plant material
developed for another 24 h in fresh medium. Compounds were
added to the cultures 2 h prior to H2O2 addition. Three independent
experiments were carried out in triplicate. All data were expressed
as percentage of the control value. Statistical comparison was made
by using one way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. The data are
expressed as meansþSEM; ##P<0.01 versus control; **P<0.01
versus H2O2 group.
The M. alba L. plant material was collected from Hunan Province
of the People’s Republic of China, and was authenticated by Pro-
fessor Zheng-Tao Wang of Shanghai University of Traditional Chi-
nese Medicine. A voucher specimen (accession number MAL-2004-
3Y) has been deposited in the Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica.
4.3. Extraction and isolation
Acknowledgements
The powder of the root bark of M. alba (2.5 kg) was extracted
with 95% EtOH at ambient temperature to give a dark crude extract
(300 g), which was partitioned between EtOAc and H2O. The EtOAc-
soluble portion (113 g) was subjected to column chromatography
on silica gel using petroleum ethereacetone mixtures of increasing
polarity. The fraction that eluted with petroleum ethereacetone
(3:1) was subjected to CC on MCI gel (MeOH/H2O, 4:6e9:1) to
obtain a major fraction (5.1 g), which was first separated over
a column of silica gel eluted with CHCl3/MeOH (20:1), and then the
major component (0.6 g) was purified by CC on RP-18 silica gel (50%
MeOH in H2O) to afford 1 (81 mg).
Financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation
(Grant No. 81021062; 20932007) of the People’s Republic of China
is gratefully acknowledged. This work was also supported in part by
the USDA Agricultural Research Service Specific Cooperative
Agreement No. 58-6408-2-0009. We thank Professor Z.-T. Wang,
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, for the iden-
tification of the plant material. We thank the Mississippi Center for
Supercomputing Research (MCSR) for computational facilities.
Supplementary data
4.3.1. Morusalbanol A (1). Yellow powder; ½a D23
ꢁ þ163 (c 0.12, MeOH);
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
UV (MeOH) lmax (log ) 201 (4.59), 221 (4.55), 276 (4.42), 312
3
(3.99) nm; CD (MeOH)
275þ0.74, 281þ0.47,
D
3
ꢀ4.27,
D
3
225ꢀ0.86,
D
3
234ꢀ3.70,
206
D
3
D
3
D 3
309þ2.43; IR (KBr) nmax 3385, 2972, 1608,
References and notes
1510, 1443, 1321, 1242, 1157, 1095, 975, 806, 624 cmꢀ1; for 1H and 13
C
NMR data, see Table 1; positive ESIMS m/z 545.2 [MþNa]þ, 1067.3
[2MþNa]þ, negative ESIMS m/z 521.2 [MꢀH]ꢀ, 1043.4 [2MꢀH]ꢀ;
HRESIMS m/z 545.1423 [MþNa]þ (calcd for C28H26O10Na 545.1424).
1. Zhang, X. S.; Wu, Z. Y. Flora of China (Zhongguo Zhiwu Zhi); Science: Beijing,
1998; vol. 23, pp 6e9.
2. State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Chinese Herb (Zhong-
hua Bencao); Shanghai Science and Technology: Shanghai, 1999; vol. 2;
525e528.
3. (a) Nomura, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 1115; (b) Nomura, T. Yakugak Zasshi
2001, 121, 535; (c) Du, J.; He, Z. D.; Jiang, R. W.; Ye, W. C.; Xu, H. X.; Paul, P. H.
Phytochemistry 2003, 62, 1235; (d) Deshpande, V. H.; Parthasarathy, P. C.;
Venkataramn, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9, 1715.
4. Hatanaka, S. I.; Kaneko, S. Phytochemistry 1977, 16, 1041.
5. Asano, N.; Oseki, K.; Tomioka, E.; Kizu, H.; Matsui, K. Carbohydrate Res. 1994,
4.3.2. Preparation of compound 2. To a solution of pyridine (3 mL)
containing 8.0 mg of compound 1, 0.5 mL of acetic anhydride was
added. The mixture was stirred for 8 h at room temperature. After
removal of the solvents under reduced pressure, the residue was
purified by a silica gel column eluted with petroleum/EtOAc (4:1) to
259, 243.
give compound 2 (8.5 mg). Compound 2: white powder; ½a D23
ꢁ þ30 (c
6. Asano, N.; Yamashita, T.; Yasuda, K.; Ikeda, K.; Kizu, H.; Kameda, Y.; Kato, A.;
Nash, R. J.; Lee, H. S.; Ryu, K. S. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 4208.
7. (a) Shi, Y. Q.; Fukai, T.; Sakagami, H.; Chang, W. J.; Yang, P. Q.; Wang, F. P.;
Nomura, T. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 181; (b) Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Hano, Y.; Uzawa,
J. Heterocycles 1982, 17, 381; (c) Nomura, T.; Fukai, T.; Hano, Y.; Uzawa, J. Het-
erocycles 1981, 16, 2141; (d) Shen, R. C.; Lin, M. Phytochemistry 2001, 57, 1231.
8. Nomura, T.; Hano, Y. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1994, 11, 205.
9. (a) Diedrich, C.; Grimme, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 2524; (b) Ding, Y.; Li, X.-
C.; Ferreira, D. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9010; (c) Ding, Y.; Li, X.-C.; Ferreira, D. J.
Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 327; (d) Ding, Y.; Li, X.-C.; Ferreira, D. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73,
435.
0.03, MeOH); UV (MeOH) lmax (log ) 198 (4.74), 240 (4.03), 250
3
(4.06), 304 (3.83) nm; CD (MeOH)
D
3
204ꢀ0.42,
D
3
216ꢀ1.47,
D
3
285þ0.48; IR (KBr) nmax 3423, 2920, 1772, 1606, 1201, 1093 cmꢀ1
;
for 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; positive ESIMS m/z 797.3
[MþNa]þ; HRESIMS m/z 797.2000 [MþNa]þ (calcd for C40H38O16Na
797.2058).
4.4. Methods of computational calculations
10. Dewick, P. M. Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosynthetic Approach, 2nd ed.; John
Wiley: Chichester, 2004, pp 175.
The theoretical calculations were performed by the SYBYL 8.1
program (Tripos International, St. Louis, MO) and the Gaussian03
program package.12 MMFF94 molecular mechanics force-field was
employed to search the possible conformations. All ground-state
geometries were optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G** level at 298 K, and
harmonic frequency analysis was computed to confirm the minima.
TDDFT at the B3LYP/6-311þþG**//B3LYP/6-31G** level in the gas
phase was employed to calculate excitation energy (in nm) and ro-
tatory strength R (velocity form Rvel and length form Rlen in 10ꢀ40 erg-
esu-cm/Gauss) between different states. The ECD spectra were sim-
ulated by overlapping Gaussian functions for each transition accord-
A
11. Wang, R.; Xiao, X. Q.; Tang, X. C. Neuroreport 2001, 12, 2629.
12. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.;
Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.;
Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.;
Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.;
Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao,
O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Adamo, C.;
Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.;
Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.;
Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.;
Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J.
V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-
Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03,
Revision B. 02; Gaussian: Pittsburgh PA, 2003.
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
P
2
D
EiÞ=ð2 Þꢁ
s
ing to
D
˛ðEÞ ¼ ð1=2:297 ꢂ 10ꢀ39Þð1=
2
ps
Þ
D
EiRieꢀ½ðEꢀ
i