slightly increased to 41% (Table 1, entry 8). Futher low-
ering the temperature had no effect on the yield, but longer
reaction time. Nonafluoro-1-butanesulfonic acid gave
similar results as TfOH (Table 1, entry 9). To our delight,
treatment of 17 with chlorosulfonic acid (ClSO3H) in
CH2Cl2 at 0 °C for only 5 min led to 18 in 40% yield
(Table 1, entry 10). After a series of experiments, we found
that treatment of 17 with ClSO3H in CH2Cl2 at ꢀ30 °C for
6 h gave the best result (Table 1, entry 11). To the best of
our knowledge, it was the first time that ClSO3H was used
as a promotor of the Schmidt reaction. Additionally, the
use of more acidic fluorosulfonic acid (FSO3H) resulted
in lower yield (Table 1, entries 13, 14 and 15). ClSO3H,
therefore, was selected as the promoter of the intramole-
cular Schmidt reaction for 17 leading to 18. However,
diastereoisomer 170 had no corresponding product under
the optimized conditions and most of 170 was consumed.
As illustrated in Scheme 3, the X-ray crystal structures
of compound 17 and 170 unambiguously reveal that the
carbonyl group is distant from the azido group in both
stable conformations in which the side substituents are at
an equatorial position (Figure 2). For compound 17, a
conformational inversion facilitates the intramolecular
Schmidt reaction successfully since azido group is close
to carbonyl group (see conformation II). However, con-
formational inversion is ineffective to 170, because both
of two conformations have unsuitable distance between
the two reactive groups for the expected intramolecular
Schmidt reaction under the optimized conditions (Scheme 3).
This information explains well with our experimental results.
Furthermore, coordination of the Lewis acids to the two
ether oxygen atoms of 17 more or less prevents the con-
formational inversion, which probably explains the failed
results during the optimization of the reaction conditions
(Table 1, entries 2ꢀ4 and 6).
Table 1. Intramolecular Schmidt Reaction of Azido Ketone 17
entry
conditions
TFA (neat), 60 °C
yield (%)
1
2
0a
0a
0a
0a
0a
0b
36
41
40
40
67
60
0b
35
25
MeAlCl2 (2 or 10 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ78 °Cfrt
3
BF3 Et2O (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ78 °Cfrt
3
4
SnCl4 (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ78 °Cfrt
5
HBF4 Et2O (2 equiv), Et2O, ꢀ78 °Cfrt
3
614
7
TiCl4 (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ78 °Cfrt
TfOH (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 2 h
8
TfOH (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ10 °C, 24 h
NfOH (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 24 h
ClSO3H (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 5 min
ClSO3H (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ30 °C, 6 h
ClSO3H (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ40 °C, 24 h
FSO3H (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
FSO3H (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ30 °C, 2 h
FSO3H (2 equiv), CH2Cl2, ꢀ40 °C, 24 h
a All of the azido ketone 17 was recovered. b 17 disappeared, but no
desired product was present.
With the key precursor 17 in hand, our effort was
focused on the construction of challenging complex lactam
18 by the intramolecular Schmidt reaction. As shown in
Table 1, treatment of 17 with neat trifluoroacetic acid
(TFA) at 60 °C did not afford the desired product 18
(Table 1, entry 1). Lewis acids used frequently in Schmidt
reaction also gave the same results (Table 1, entries 2ꢀ5).
In particular, using TiCl4 as the promotor, 18 was not ob-
tained but 17 disappeared (Table 1, entry 6).14 Encouragingly,
when applying trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (TfOH) in
CH2Cl2 at 0 °C (Table 1, entry 7), we obtained the desired
product 18 albeit a low yield of 36%. When the reaction
was carried out at ꢀ10 °C for about one day, the yield
With the main skeleton of FR901483 (1) constructed,
subsequent introduction of the amino group and transfor-
mation of functional groups would complete the total
synthesis of 1 (Scheme 4). Compound 18 was treated with
LDA in THF at ꢀ78 °C, followed by DPPA (22) and
Boc2O at the same temperature gave 19 and its epimer in
85% yield (dr = 2:1).15 Despite its modest dr value, this
methodology provides a good method for the synthesis of
R-amino lactam. Removal of the benzyl protecting group
of 2-Boc-aminolactam 19 was completed with catalytic
hydrogenolysis over Pd(OH)2/C to give 20 in 95% yield.
Both of Boc and the lactam group were reduced in one step
through LiAlH4 in refluxing THF, and then the resulting
secondary amine was protected with a Cbz group to afford
diol 21.2c Compound 21 was converted to 1 under mild
conditions in two steps.2e Selective phosphitylation of
the C-9 hydroxy gave the corresponding phosphite ester
intermediate, which was then oxidized with m-CPBA in
the presence of Et3N to give the dibenzyl phosphate 22.
(9) (a) Fan, C.-A.; Tu, Y.-Q.; Song, Z.-L.; Zhang, E.; Shi, L.; Wang,
M.; Wang, B; Zhang, S.-Y. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4691–4694. (b) Hu, X.-D.;
Tu, Y. Q.; Zhang, E.; Gao, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, A.; Fan, C.-A.; Wang,
M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1823–1825. (c) Zhao, Y.-M.; Gu, P.; Tu, Y.-Q.;
Fan, C.-A.; Zhang, Q. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1763–1766. (d) Zhao, Y.-M.;
Gu, P.; Zhang, H.-J.; Zhang, Q.-W.; Fan, C.-A.; Tu, Y.-Q.; Zhang,
F.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3211–3213. (e) Chen, Z.-H.; Zhang, Y.-Q.;
Chen, Z.-M.; Tu, Y.-Q.; Zhang, F.-M. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1836–
1838. (f) Chen, Z.-H.; Chen, Z.-M.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Tu, Y.-Q.; Zhang,
F.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 10173–10186.
(10) For a modified preparation of the literature procedure, see the
Supporting Information.
(11) CCDC 877989 (10), CCDC 877990 (17), and CCDC 877991 (170)
contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These
data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallo-
(12) Goddard-Borger, E. D.; Stick, R. V. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3797–
3800.
(13) Trost, B. M.; Scudder, P. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 7601–
7610.
(14) When we were preparing this paper, it was reported that the
TiCl4 could promote the semipinacolꢀSchmidt reaction of the simple
substance in reference 6b. However, our previous experiment indicated
that this condition did not work for 17, which contains the necessary
functional groups for synthesis of FR901483.
(15) The relative stereochemistry of product 19 was confirmed by
later synthesis. For the reaction with DPPA for synthesis of R-amino
lactam, see: (a) Villalgordo, J. M.; Linden, A.; Heimgartner, H. Helv.
Chim. Acta 1996, 79, 213–219. (b) Bentz, E. L.; Goswami, R.; Moloney,
M. G.; Westway, S. M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 2872–2882.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C