Organic Letters
Letter
arylboronic acids in the presence of a palladium hydride
species, providing the hydroarylation products. Although this
reaction would provide a new path for the hydroarylation of
1,3-dienes, the catalyst system seems to be immature with
respect to the substrate scope and reaction yield. This research
precedent stimulated us to develop a new catalyst system for
the hydroarylation of 1,3-dienes, which covers a broad scope of
arenes without the use of an external hydride source. We now
report the nickel-catalyzed hydroarylation of 1,3-dienes with
arylboronic acids using secondary homoallyl carbonates as a
surrogate for the 1,3-diene and hydride source (Scheme 1e).
We began our investigation with the optimization of the
reaction conditions (Table 1). Recently, Krische and co-
the transformation, giving the desired hydroarylation product
3aa in 89% yield (Table 1, entry 3). In sharp contrast, the
reaction with P(p-CF3C6H4)3 failed to give the desired product
3aa (Table 1, entry 4). In addition, the use of sterically
congested monophosphine ligands such as P(o-tol)3, P(o-
MeOC6H4)3, PCy3, Pt-Bu3, and XPhos retarded the reaction
(Table 1, entries 5−9). We also evaluated the effect of the
bisphosphine ligands in the nickel catalyst system. DPPPent
and DPEphos were not effective for the reaction, yielding 3aa
in low yields (Table 1, entries 10 and 11). The reaction in the
presence of Xantphos led to a decrease in the yield of 3aa
(Table 1, entry 12). When bipyridine- and phenanthroline-
derived ligands were employed in the reaction as the ligands,
the desired product 3aa was formed in low yields (Table 1,
entries 13 and 14). The ligand screening indicated that the use
of a triarylphosphine bearing an electron-donating group at the
para position on the phenyl ring is essential to proceed the
transformation. To improve the yield of 3aa, the reaction of 1a
with 2a was performed using the Ni(cod)2/P(p-MeOC6H4)3
system for 36 h. Fortunately, the reaction proceeded
quantitatively to give the desired product 3aa in 94% isolated
yield (Table 1, entry 15).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we
examined the reaction of various homoallyl carbonates 1
with phenylboronic acid (2a) (Scheme 2). The reaction could
be conducted on a 3 mmol scale to give the desired
hydroarylation product 3aa in 93% yield. The reaction of
homoallyl carbonates 1b−e bearing electron-donating (Me,
MeO) and -withdrawing (CF3, CO2Me) substituents at the
para position on the phenyl rings smoothly proceeded to
provide the corresponding hydroarylation products 3ba−ea in
83−93% yields. Homoallyl carbonates 1f and 1g having 4-
fluorophenyl and biphenyl groups underwent the reaction to
give the desired products 3fa and 3ga in 87% and 89% yield,
respectively. Both electron-donating and -withdrawing sub-
stituents at the meta and ortho positions on their phenyl rings
were compatible with the reaction, giving the corresponding
hydroarylation products 3ha−ma in 71−91% yields. The other
substituents, such as piperonyl (1n), 2-naphthyl (1o), and 6-
methoxy-2-naphthyl (1p) groups, were well tolerated during
the nickel catalysis. Our nickel catalyst system can be also
applicable to the transformation of homoally carbonates 1q
and 1r having pyridine rings, affording the hydroarylation
product 3qa and 3ra in 65% and 93% yield, respectively.
Unfortunately, other heterocyclic rings such as furan and
thiophene were not tolerated during the reaction, resulting in
the complex mixture of unassigned products. In addition,
although the reaction of homoally carbonates bearing aliphatic
substituents (R = cyclohexyl) proceeded under the reaction
conditions, we could not isolate the desired products as a pure
form (89% conv, 42% NMR yield). We confirmed that the
reaction of homoally carbonates 1s and 1t did not take place
under the optimized reaction conditions. In the reactions with
1e, 1i, 1o, and 1q, we confirmed the formation of a trace
amount of the corresponding 1,4-hydroarylation products by
1H NMR analyses of the crude mixture.
a
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
b
b
entry
L
conv (%)
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PPh3
P(p-tol)3
72
90
94
<1
<1
25
32
16
<1
26
56
73
59
36
>99
53
c
81
89
c
P(p-MeOC6H4)3
P(p-CF3C6H4)3
P(o-tol)3
P(o-MeOC6H4)3
PCy3
P-t-Bu3
XPhos
DPPPent
DPEphos
<1
<1
13
19
2
9
<1
5
10
11
12
13
14
20
57
15
6
Xantphos
4,4′-di-t-Bu-2,2′-bpy
1,10-phenanthroline
P(p-MeOC6H4)3
d
e
f
15
>99 (94)
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.25 mmol), 2a (0.375 mmol), Ni(cod)2
(0.025 mmol), L (0.05 mmol), K2CO3 (0.375 mmol) in CH3CN (0.2
1
M) at 60 °C for 18 h. E/Z ratios were determined by H NMR
b
analyses of crude mixture. The conversions and yields were
1
determined by H NMR analysis using phenanthrene as an internal
c
standard. A trace amount of the 1,4-hydroarylation product was
d
observed by the 1H NMR analysis of the crude mixture. The reaction
e
1
time was prolonged to 36 h. The yield was determined by H NMR
f
analysis using CH2Br2 as an internal standard. Isolated yield as a
mixture with a trace amount of Z isomer.
workers reported an intriguing result in which a homoallyl
carbonate was converted into the hydroarylation product in the
presence of a nickel catalyst via in situ formation of a 1,3-diene
(single example).17 Based on this result, we chose secondary
homoallyl carbonate 1a, which is readily prepared by the
reaction of benzaldehyde with allylorganometallic reagents,18
and Ni(cod)2 as a catalyst. The reaction of homoallyl
carbonate 1a with phenylboronic acid (2a) was carried out
in the presence of 10 mol % Ni(cod)2, 20 mol % PPh3, and 1.5
equiv of K2CO3 in CH3CN at 60 °C for 18 h. We confirmed
that hydroarylation product 3aa was formed in 53% yield
(Table 1, entry 1). Motivated by this initial result, we
examined the screening of monophoshine ligands (Table 1,
entries 2−9). The use of P(p-tol)3 as the ligand improved the
yield of 3aa to 81% (Table 1, entry 2). A combination of
Ni(cod)2 and P(p-MeOC6H4)3 was found to be effective for
We next investigated the scope of arylboronic acids 2 in the
reaction of homoallyl carbonate 1a (Scheme 3). Both electron-
rich and -poor phenylboronic acids 2b−f underwent the
reaction to afford the hydroarylation products 3ab−af in high
yields. Functionalized phenylboronic acids bearing acetyl and
terminal alkene groups also participated in the reaction,
providing the desired hydroarylation products 3ag and 3ah in
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX