1194 S. Shukla et al.
Spectral data of compound TS01 and TS02 are given
below whereas spectroscopic data of remaining com-
pounds are documented in Supplementary file.
concentration of compounds was added in triplicate to
every well having monolayer of cells and incubated at
37°C in a CO2 incubator for 48 h. After incubation, 30 µL
of 5 mg/mL solution of 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,
5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was added to
each well, and the plate was incubated for another 4h.
Incubation at 37°C for 4 h allowed the reduction of MTT
by viable cells to an insoluble formazan product, which
was dissolved by addition of 0.04 N HCl in isopropanol,
and the absorbance of each well was measured by using
ELISA plate reader at 540 nm. Statistical analysis was
performed using Graph Pad prism software, version 5
(Graph Pad software) by nonlinear regression analysis.
IC50 values were calculated for each set of triplicate wells.
4-benzylideneamino 1, 2-naphthoquinone-2-
thiosemicarbazone (TS01)
Yield: 61.4%. M.P. 184–185°C; IR (KBr, υmax·cm−1): 3458.84
(–NH2 str.), 3053.19 (Ar.–C–H str.), 1683.49 (C=O str. of qui-
none), 1626.57 (–CH=N str.), 1576.59 (C=N str.), 1239.75
1
(C=S str.); H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ (ppm): 13.89
(s, 1H, NH), 9.26, 8.86 (2s, 2H, NH2), 8.31 (s,1H, –CH=N),
6.89–7.79 (m, 9H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (DMSO–d6) δ (ppm):
118.29–140.06 (Aromatic–C, C5-C10, C1’-C6’), 154.29 (–C=N),
157.42 (–CH=N), 177.78 (C=O of quinone), 180.17 (C=S);
anal. calcd. For C18H14N4OS (%): C, 64.65; H, 4.22; N, 16.75;
S, 9.59. Found (%): C, 64.69; H, 4.26; N, 16.73; S, 9.63.
Molecular docking
Molecular docking studies were conducted in order
to validate the obtained pharmacological data and to
provide understandable evidence for the observed anti-
cancer activity of the compounds. e computation was
carried out using the Schrödinger 2011 molecular model-
ling software package. Docking was performed by using
the Glide 5.7 integrated with Maestro 9.2 (Schrödinger,
LLC, 2011) interface on the Linux operating system.
4-(4-nitrobenzylideneamino) 1, 2-naphthoquinone-2-
thiosemicarbazone (TS02)
Yield: 53.2%. M.P. 198–199°C; IR (KBr, υmax·cm−1): 3443.31
(–NH2 str.), 3219.02 (–NH str.) 3078.14 (Ar.–C–H str.),
1678.12 (C=O str. of quinone), 1623.49 (–CH=N str.),
1571.19 (C=N str.), 1367.26, 1520.28 (–N=O str.), 1219.10
1
(C=S str.); H NMR (DMSO–d6, 300 MHz) δ (ppm): 14.08
(s, 1H, NH), 9.42, 8.97 (2s, 2H, NH2), 8.57 (s,1H,–CH=N),
7.48–8.27 (m, 8H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (DMSO–d6) δ (ppm):
127.29–142.53 (Aromatic–C, C5–C10 C1’–C6’), 155.71 (–C=N),
159.33 (–CH=N), 178.67 (C=O of quinone),181.31 (C=S);
anal. calcd. For C18H13N5O3S (%): C, 56.98; H, 3.45; N, 18.46;
S, 8.45. Found (%): C, 57.01; H, 3.42; N, 18.50; S, 8.41.
In silico ADME predictions of the best fit molecules
e ultimate goal of drug discovery is the identification
of innovative small molecular scaffolds exhibiting high
binding affinity and selectivity for the target enzyme
together with a reasonable absorption, distribution,
metabolism and excretion (ADME) profile. Such chemi-
cal entities are likely to carve a niche in the horizon of
drug development process. e best fit ligands were neu-
tralized and checked for their ADME properties using
Qikprop17.
Since quinones are good electrophiles so they can eas-
ily be attacked by Glutathione (GSH) in the liver, resulting
in the formation of GSH-quinone conjugates, which is the
natural defence exerted by our body to reduce toxicity of
electrophillic drugs like quinone18,19. Hence possibility
of most active compound (TS10) to form glutathione
conjugate was predicted by using software Pallas v3.1.1.2
which generated a pool of possible metabolites of TS1020.
General procedure for synthesis
of 4-cycloalkylidineamino 1,
2-naphthoquinone-2-thiosemicarbazones
To the boiling solution of 4-cycloalkylidineamino 1,
2-naphthoquinone (0.01 M) in 50 mL of ethanol, few
drops of glacial acetic acid were added. ereafter, thi-
osemicarbazide hydrochloride (0.01 M) dissolved in
15 mL of water was added drop wise with stirring. e
reaction mixture was refluxed for 10–12 h. On cooling the
precipitate formed was filtered and recrystallized with
methanol.
In vitro antiproliferative activity
e cytotoxicity of compounds TS01-TS18 was evaluated
against MCF-7 (human breast cancer), Hep-G2 (liver
sarcoma) and MG-63 (Osteosarcoma) cell lines using the
standard MTT assay16. Doxorubicin, a quinone derivative
and a clinical antitumor drug, was used as a marker to
evaluate the relative cytotoxic efficiency of synthesized
compounds. Compounds TS09, TS10, TS11 and TS13
were further evaluated against MCF-12A, a normal epi-
thelial cell line.
e cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at the density of
approximately 20,000 cells per well and allowed to attach
for 24 h. Various concentrations (1–25 µM) of the test
compounds were prepared by dissolving them in DMSO
and then by serially diluting with culture medium. Each
Results and discussion
Synthesis of 4-arylideneamino/cycloalkylidineamino
1, 2-naphthoquinone thiosemicarba-zones
e synthetic route of the target compounds TS01–TS18 is
illustrated in Scheme 1. According to previously reported
method, synthesis of starting materials 1, 2-naphtho-
quinone was accomplished from water soluble dye
β-naphthol orange13. 4-amino 1, 2-naphthoquinone
(ANQ), the key intermediate for the synthesis of target
compounds was obtained through nucleophilic sub-
stitution of 1, 2-naphthoquinone with sodium azide in
acetic acid. Condensation of ANQ with appropriate aryl
aldehydes/cyclic ketones in presence of glacial acetic
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry