Page 5 of 8
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
vent was evaporated to adsorb the residue on the silica gel. Pu-
12H). 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 100.5, 81.7, 35.4, 33.6,
32.7, 24.2, 23.2, 22.0. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C11H20BrO2
[M-H]+ 263.0647, found 263.0637.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
rification by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl
acetate = 20/1 with 1% triethylamine) afforded the product as a
pale yellow oil. Method D: This method is similar to Method
C. After the reaction completed, the solvent and volatile mate-
rials were evaporated under vacuum. To the residue, a saturated
aqueous NaHCO3 solution and diethyl ether were added to ex-
tract. The aqueous layer was further extracted with diethyl ether
(twice). The combined organic layer was washed with water
and brine, and was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After
filtration, the solvent was evaporated under vacuum. To the res-
idue, dichloromethane (10 mL) and silica gel (2.5 g) were added,
and the solvent was evaporated to adsorb the residue on the sil-
ica gel. Purification by silica gel column chromatography (hex-
ane/ethyl acetate = 20/1 with 1% triethylamine) afforded the
product as a pale yellow oil.
2-(6-Bromohexyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3ha). Method A was applied (366 mg, 1.25 mmol, 63% yield).
1H NMR (300MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.02 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.39 (t,
J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.90–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.62–1.55 (m, 2H), 1.46–
1.35 (m, 6H), 1.19 (s, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ
100.8, 81.6, 36.3, 33.9, 32.7, 28.7, 28.0, 24.2 (2C), 22.0. HRMS
(ESI): m/z calcd for C13H24BrO2 [M-H]+ 291.0960, found
291.0970.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
2-(3-Iodopropyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane (3ia).
Method D was applied (196 mg, 0.66 mmol, 33% yield). The
spectral data for 3ia were in accordance with those reported in
2-(5-Benzyloxypentyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3ja). Method D was applied (299 mg, 0.97 mmol, 49% yield).
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30–7.17 (m, 5H), 4.96 (t, J =
5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (s, 2H), 3.39 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.59–1.50
(m, 4H), 1.37–1.32 (m, 4H), 1.13 (s, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.6, 128.3, 127.6, 127.4, 100.8, 81.5, 72.8,
70.3, 36.4, 29.7, 26.2, 24.3, 24.2, 22.0. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd
for C19H30O3Na [M+Na]+ 329.2093, found 329.2076.
2-Heptyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane (3aa). Method
1
A was applied (0.17 g, 0.74 mmol, 37% yield). H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.02 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 1.61–1.54 (m, 2H),
1.40–1.27 (m, 10H), 1.19 (s, 12H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H).
13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 101.0, 81.5, 36.5, 31.8, 29.6,
29.2, 24.5, 24.2, 22.6, 22.1, 14.1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for
C14H27O2 [M-H]+ 227.2011, found 227.2019.
2-(3-Methylbutyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3ba). Method A was applied (0.19 g, 0.95 mmol, 47% yield).
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.01 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 1.61–
1.51 (m, 3H), 1.31–1.23 (m, 2H), 1.19 (s, 12H), 0.88 (d, J = 6.6
Hz, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 101.2, 81.5, 34.3,
33.4, 28.0, 24.2, 22.5, 22.1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for
C12H23O2 [M-H]+ 199.1698, found 199.1691.
2-(9-Benzyloxynonyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3ka). Method B was applied (374 mg, 1.03 mmol, 52% yield).
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.27–7.16 (m, 5H), 4.97 (t, J =
5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (s, 2H), 3.39 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.59–1.49
(m, 4H), 1.34–1.22 (m, 12H), 1.13 (s, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (75
MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.5, 128.2, 127.4, 127.3, 100.8, 81.3, 72.7,
70.3, 36.3, 29.6, 29.5, 29.3 (3C), 26.0, 24.3, 24.1, 21.9. HRMS
(ESI): m/z calcd for C23H38O3Na [M+Na]+ 385.2719, found
385.2703.
2-(3,3-Dimethylbutyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3ca). Method A was applied (196 mg, 0.91 mmol, 46% yield).
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.99 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 1.60–
1.52 (m, 2H), 1.31–1.20 (m, 2H), 1.19 (s, 12H), 0.87 (s, 9H).
13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 101.7, 81.6, 38.3, 31.7, 30.0,
29.2, 24.2, 22.1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C13H25O2 [M-H]+
213.1855, found 213.1860.
2-(4-Carboxybutyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3la). Method B was applied. Maleic anhydride was used in-
stead of MeBQ as an additive. Water was used instead of a sat-
urated aqueous NaHCO3 solution for extraction. After filtration
of the drying agent, the solvent was evaporated and volatile ma-
terials were further removed under vacuum at 40 ℃ overnight
to afford 3la as a pale yellow oil (276 mg, 1.20 mmol, 60%
yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.42 (br, 1H), 5.00 (t, J
= 5.2 Hz, 1H), 2.32 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.68–1.55 (m, 4H), 1.47–
1.38 (m, 2H), 1.16 (s, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ
179.7, 100.5, 81.7, 35.9, 33.9, 24.6, 24.1, 23.9, 21.9. IR (neat)
ν 1710 cm-1 (C=O). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C12H21O4 [M-
H]+ 229.1440, found 229.1431.
2-(3-Phenylpropyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3da). Method A was applied (0.30 g, 1.21 mmol, 61% yield).
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.23–7.11 (m, 5H), 5.02 (t, J =
5.1 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.76–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.63–
1.57 (m, 2H), 1.16 (s, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ
142.2, 128.4, 128.2, 125.6, 100.7, 81.6, 35.8, 35.7, 26.1, 24.2,
22.1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C16H23O2 [M-H]+ 247.1698,
found 247.1707.
2-(5-Chloropentyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3ea). Method C was applied (284 mg, 1.20 mmol, 60% yield).
1H NMR (300MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.02 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.52 (t,
J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.82–1.73 (m, 2H), 1.64–1.56 (m, 2H), 1.52–
1.37 (m, 4H), 1.19 (s, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ
100.7, 81.6, 45.0, 36.2, 32.5, 26.9, 24.2, 23.8, 22.0. HRMS
(ESI): m/z calcd for C12H22ClO2 [M-H]+ 233.1308, found
233.1306.
2-(4-Benzyloxycarbonylbutyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-di-
oxolane (3ma). Method B was applied. Maleic anhydride was
used instead of MeBQ as an additive (326 mg, 1.02 mmol, 51%
yield). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37–7.31 (m, 5H), 5.11
(s, 2H), 5.01 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.74–
1.56 (m, 4H), 1.48–1.38 (m, 2H), 1.18 (s, 12H). 13C{1H} NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.4, 136.1, 128.5, 128.1, 100.6, 81.6, 66.1,
36.0, 34.2, 24.9, 24.2, 24.0, 22.0. IR (neat) ν 1738 cm-1 (C=O).
HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C19H27O4 [M-H]+ 319.1909, found
319.1922.
2-(3-Bromopropyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3fa). Method C was applied (384 mg, 1.53 mmol, 76% yield).
The spectral data for 3fa were in accordance with those reported
2-(3-Bromopropyl)-5,5-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane (3fb) and 2-
(2-bromoethyl)-2,5,5-trimethyl-1,3-dioxane (5fb). Method D
was applied. 2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-propanediol was used instead of
pinacol. Purification by silica gel column chromatography af-
forded a mixture of 3fb and 5fb as a pale yellow oil (323 mg,
1.36 mmol, 68% total yield, 3fb:5fb = 2.1:1). 1H NMR for 3fb
2-(4-Bromobutyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3-dioxolane
(3ga). Method C was applied (395 mg, 1.49 mmol, 75% yield).
1H NMR (300MHz , CDCl3) δ 5.03 (t, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (t,
J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.95–1.85 (m, 2H), 1.64–1.48 (m, 4H), 1.19 (s,
ACS Paragon Plus Environment