time, see Fig. S4–S9 and Table S2 in ESIw), only a marginal
increase in energy conversion efficiency (from 5.12% to
5.21%) was achieved. From IPCE, as shown in Fig. 5, it is
quite clear that photons between 450 and 550 nm are picked up
by BET and the fluorescence study on the Al2O3 nanoparticle film
also confirmed efficient energy transfer from BET to porphyrin
(Fig. S10–S12 in ESIw), an IPCE drop between 550 and 650 nm
was observed. This drop could be ascribed to the replacement of
DMPZn-C2-COOH by BET as evidenced by the appearance of a
Soret band in BET solution.
Fig. 6 Proposed adsorption models of DMPZn-C2-COOH (A) and
TPPZn-COOH (B) on the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles.
the distance between the Ti atom and the edge of the porphyrin is
B6.12 A, which is shorter than that in benzoic acid modified
porphyrin TPPZn-COOH (B8.58 A). Therefore, it is most likely
that DMPZn-C2-COOH binds to the TiO2 with two mesityl
groups parallel to the surface of the TiO2 NPs, which widens the
distance between two porphyrin molecules, as shown schematically
in Fig. 6. As a result, density of DMPZn-C2-COOH on the
TiO2 surface decreased (0.67 Â 10À10 and 1.24 Â 10À10 mol cmÀ2
for DMPZn-C2-COOH and TMPZn-COOH,14 respectively);
however, the parallel alignment of mesityl groups provides an
effective shielding to electron recombination with an electrolyte,
which is supported by their different electrochemical impedance
spectroscopy (EIS).21 The Nyquist plots of their EIS obtained at
an applied bias of À0.60 V in the dark are shown in Fig. 7. It was
found that the electron lifetime and recombination resistance
of DMPZn-C2-COOH-sensitized cells (25 ms and 796.8 O)
were larger than those of TPPZn-COOH-sensitized solar cells
(21 ms and 688.9 O). The longer lifetime of DMPZn-C2-COOH
most likely comes from lower electron recombination between
TiO2/electrolyte interfaces.
In summary, a simple porphyrin dye with an acrylic acid at
the meso position exhibited 5.1% energy conversion efficiency,
which is promising for cost-effective dye-sensitized solar cells.
It is expected that integration of a donor group and bulky groups
to the porphyrin framework will lead to better performance.
We are currently working in these directions and results will be
reported in due course.
Notes and references
1 B. O’Regan and M. Gratzel, Nature, 1991, 353, 737–740.
¨
2 A. Hagfeldt, G. Boschloo, L. Sun, L. Kloo and H. Pettersson,
Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 6595–6663.
3 Y.-C. Chang, C.-L. Wang, T.-Y. Pan, S.-H. Hong, C.-M. Lan,
H.-H. Kuo, C.-F. Lo, H.-Y. Hsu, C.-Y. Lin and E. W.-G. Diau,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8910–8912.
4 E. M. Barea, V. Gonzalez-Pedro, T. Ripolles-Sanchis, H.-P. Wu,
L.-L. Li, C.-Y. Yeh, E. W.-G. Diau and J. Bisquert, J. Phys. Chem.
C, 2011, 115, 10898–10902.
5 W. M. Campbell, A. K. Burrell, D. L. Officer and K. W. Jolley,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004, 248, 1363–1379.
6 C.-L. Wang, C.-M. Lan, S.-H. Hong, Y.-F. Wang, T.-Y. Pan,
C.-W. Chang, H.-H. Kuo, M.-Y. Kuo, E. W.-G. Diau and
C.-Y. Lin, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 6933–6940.
7 C.-L. Wang, Y.-C. Chang, C.-M. Lan, C.-F. Lo, E. Wei-Guang
Diau and C.-Y. Lin, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 1788–1795.
8 C.-Y. Lin, C.-F. Lo, L. Luo, H.-P. Lu, C.-S. Hung and E. W.-G.
Diau, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 755–764.
9 C.-W. Lee, H.-P. Lu, C.-M. Lan, Y.-L. Huang, Y.-R. Liang,
W.-N. Yen, Y.-C. Liu, Y.-S. Lin, E. W.-G. Diau and C.-Y. Yeh,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 1403–1412.
In an effort to further enhance the energy conversion
efficiency, a co-sensitization approach was applied to make up
the weak absorption of this porphyrin between 450 and 550 nm.
The co-sensitizer is a boron dipyrromethene dye (denoted BET)
with strong absorption and fluorescence at around 500 nm as
we described previously.17 After systematic studies (a cocktail
vs. sequential method with different dye molar ratio and loading
10 C.-P. Hsieh, H.-P. Lu, C.-L. Chiu, C.-W. Lee, S.-H. Chuang,
C.-L. Mai, W.-N. Yen, S.-J. Hsu, E. W.-G. Diau and C.-Y. Yeh,
J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 1127–1134.
11 T. Bessho, S. Zakeeruddin, C. Y. Yeh, E. G. Diau and M. Gratzel,
¨
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 6646–6649.
12 A. Yella, H.-W. Lee, H. N. Tsao, C. Yi, A. K. Chandiran,
M. K. Nazeeruddin, E. W.-G. Diau, C.-Y. Yeh, S. M. Zakeeruddin
and M. Gratzel, Science, 2011, 334, 629–634.
¨
¨
13 M. Gratzel, Nature, 2001, 414, 338–344.
14 D. Xiao, L. A. Martini, R. C. Snoeberger, R. H. Crabtree and
V. S. Batista, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 9014–9022.
15 O. B. Locos and D. P. Arnold, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4,
902–916.
16 J. A. Shelnutt, K. D. Straub, P. M. Rentzepis, M. Gouterman and
E. R. Davidson, Biochemistry, 1984, 23, 3946–3954.
17 M. Shrestha, L. Si, C.-W. Chang, H. He, A. Sykes, C.-Y. Lin and
E. W.-G. Diau, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 10451–10460.
18 H. He, A. Gurung and L. Si, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48,
5910–5912.
19 T. W. Hamann, R. A. Jensen, A. B. F. Martinson, H. Van Ryswyk
and J. T. Hupp, Energy Environ. Sci., 2008, 1, 66–78.
20 M. V. Martinez-Diaz, G. de la Torre and T. Torres, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 7090–7108.
Fig. 7 Nyquist plots of DMPZn-C2-COOH and TPPZn-COOH
sensitized cells under bias of À0.60 V. The inset is an equivalent
Randles circuit impedance model. The dots are experimental data; the
solid lines are fitting results. RS is the series resistance accounting for
transport resistance of TCO; Rct is the charge transfer resistance for
electron recombination at the FTO/TiO2/electrolyte interfaces; while
CPE is the constant phase element representing capacitance at the
TiO2/electrolyte/interface.
21 I. Mora-Sero, J. Bisquert, F. Fabregat-Santiago, G. Garcia-
Belmonte, G. Zoppi, K. Durose, Y. Proskuryakov, I. Oja,
A. Belaidi, T. Dittrich, R. Tena-Zaera, A. Katty, C. Levy-Clement,
V. Barrioz and S. J. C. Irvine, Nano Lett., 2006, 6, 640–650.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7619–7621 7621