bearing a single C18 appendage, saturated in the former and
unsaturated in the latter.
Net excision of the carbonyl moieties from the structure of 2
formally results in cation structure 5. The effect of doing so is
remarkable. While the Tm value of 2 is 14.6 1C, that of 5 is
À42.2 1C, a DTm of 56.8 1C. This is clearly the direct result of
suppressing the strong, carbonyl-induced dipolar contribution
to the inter-particulate cohesive forces acting in 2. Not only is
the Tm value of 5 very low in absolute terms, it is quite similar
to that of imidazolium IL 6, lowest-melting (À46.8 1C) member
of the first generation of lipidic ILs. A ‘map’ illustrating the
effect of these changes upon Tm is shown in Fig. 2.
Significantly, the Tm difference (Table 1) between 1 and its
imidazolium counterpart 3 is a scant 1.3 1C, despite the
doubled cation side-chain organic content of the former.
While acknowledging the comparison of 1 and 3 to be some-
thing of an ‘apples and oranges’ matter because of their
different head group types, the fact remains that the Tm of 1
is still low in absolute terms (well below the 100 1C benchmark
used as the upper Tm cut off for defining ionic liquids).
This, then, lends credence to the hypothesis that a putative
imidazolium analogue incorporating two saturated C18 chains
arranged in parallel might be reasonably anticipated to like-
wise manifest a sub-100 1C value of Tm.
A comparison of the Tm values of new ILs 1 and 2 with each
other is also informative. As noted, these differ only in the
nature of their lipidic side chains as either saturated (1) or
unsaturated (2). Here again, as with the lipidic imidazolium
ILs, the incorporation of a double bond in the side chain
results in a substantial decrease in Tm – that of 1 is 54.8 1C,
while that of 2 is 14.6 1C, a DTm of 40.2 1C. This demonstrates
that the Tm-lowering effect of side chain unsaturation is
relevant not just when an IL head group is an imidazolium
ring. Rather, it is clearly operative across both classes of ionic
liquids, with their dramatically different head group types and
total organic content. This buttresses our expectation that the
‘double bond effect’ is likely to prove very general, and
broadly applicable when designing ILs of various classes
whenever low melting points must be retained while still
imbuing the material with a high degree of hydrocarbon
side-chain content.
Significantly, both 5 and 6 have two side-chain double
bonds, although they are in the same chain in 6 but two
separate side chains in 5. With this in mind, and noting that
there is a substantial difference in Tm resulting from having
one (IL 4) versus two (IL 6) double bonds in a given cation, it
seems likely that the double bond effect is cumulative. At the
same time, it appears that the specific locations of the side-chain
double bonds may be of secondary importance; this comports
with observations we made in our earlier study vis-a-vis the Tm
differences between ILs as a function of the position of double
bonds in the lipidic side chain.2
It also bears noting that the Tm decrease (40.2 1C) brought
about by the formal introduction of two double bonds into the
cation structure of 1 to generate cation 2 is a substantial
proportion – about 70% – of the magnitude of the Tm increase
(56.8 1C) that is induced by the formal introduction into 5 of two
dipolar carbonyl groups, a change which likewise generates 2
(Fig. 2). This indicates that it is possible to take a basic cation
framework and temper the impact that one modification to it has
– pertaining here to its conceptual ‘baseline’ Tm – by making a
simultaneous modification of opposing effect to the same ion.
The overall features of the DSC curves (Fig. 3) from which
the Tm values of 1, 2 and 5 are extracted are highly evocative of
those observed with many natural lipids and polymers.8,9
Among these is the magnitude of the enthalpy change associated
with the melting events. In this regard it is notable that the
transitions of ILs 2 and 5 are very weak compared to that of 1.
This is indicative of solid states on the parts of 2 and 5 in which
side-chain interactions are not optimal due to the disorder brought
about by the double-bond induced side-chain kinking, a pheno-
menon clearly observed with saturated versus unsaturated natural
Although the salutary effect upon Tm of unsaturated versus
saturated side chains is again evident in these results, the
absolute 14.6 1C Tm value of double-tailed lipid IL 2 is
still considerably higher than that observed for benchmark
imidazolium IL 4. Of course, as would be the case for any IL,
its Tm value is the outworking of a number of factors, among
which are the number and strengths of all possible cohesive
forces. In typical (e.g., non-functionalized) imidazolium-type ILs,
two inter-particulate force types – Coulombic and London – are
thought to predominate.6 However, the inter-particulate cohesive
forces acting in 1 and 2 would clearly include strong dipolar
contributions from the two ester linkages present in the cation
head group area of each.7 Note that the imidazolium IL
benchmarks 3 and 4 are devoid of such components. So, to
probe the impact these ester groups have upon Tm, we
prepared IL 5 by anion exchange from a third commercially
available cationic lipid chloride salt.
Table 1 Tm values of lipidic ionic liquids. The values for compounds
3, 4, and 6 are taken from ref. 2
Ionic liquid
Tm (oC)
Æ
1
2
3
4
5
6
54.8
14.6
53.5
À20.9
À42.2
À46.8
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
Fig. 2 Structural changes and their Tm impacts.
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7522–7524 7523
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012