H2amp > H2aep ≈ Htau > Hbala ≈ Hgly > Hgaba (Fig. 3). Inter-
estingly, the receptor has lower affinity for amino acids contain-
ing a carboxylate group than for amino acids with a tetrahedral
anionic group. This suggests that the latter are preferred due to
the 3-fold symmetry of their anionic group which should be
complementary to the tren subunit of the cryptand17 and possibly
due to the formation of a higher number of hydrogen bonds.
In conclusion, a polyoxapolyaza heteroditopic macrobicyclic
compound was synthesized through a [1 + 1] “tripod–tripod
coupling” strategy to be used as a receptor for the recognition of
amino acids. The binding studies showed that the protonated
receptor binds the zwitterionic amino acid substrates through a
combination of hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interactions and
possibly cation–π interactions with association constants in the
range of 1.63–3.21 log units, the highest values in comparison
with reported ones determined under identical experimental con-
ditions (H2O–MeOH solutions). The receptor showed a prefer-
ence for amino acids containing a tetrahedral anionic group due
to the 3-fold symmetry of their anionic moiety, complementary
to the tren subunit of the cryptand.
Fig. 3 Plot of Keff versus pH for the associations formed between the
indicated amino acids and HnbtpN4O3n+, in H2O–MeOH (50 : 50 v/v)
solution at 298.2 K and 0.10 M NMe4TsO.
The acid–base behaviour of btpN4O3 is straightforward: three
protonation constants were found in the working pH region
(3.0–10.0), corresponding to the successive protonations of the
secondary amines. The tertiary amine is very acidic due to the
nearby presence of three positive charges, hence its protonation
constant cannot be obtained in the working pH region. As shown
in Fig. 2, the fully protonated form of the receptor,
H3btpN4O33+, exists as the main species below pH ≈ 6.2. This
receptor species exhibits a compartment with three protonated
amines to interact with the anionic group of the amino acids
through electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding. The
other compartment has three ether oxygen atoms available to
accept hydrogen bonds from the ammonium group of the sub-
strates and an aromatic unit which may contribute to the esta-
blishment of cation–π interactions.
Acknowledgements
The NMR spectrometers are part of the National NMR Network
and were purchased in the framework of the National Program
for Scientific Re-equipment, contract REDE/1517/RMN/2005,
with funds from POCI 2010 (FEDER) and Fundação para a
Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT). M. C. Almeida from the Elemen-
tal Analysis and Mass Spectrometry Service at the ITQB is
acknowledged for providing elemental analysis and ESI-MS
data. Pedro Mateus thanks FCT for the grant (SFRH/BD/36159/
2007).
The association constants of the protonated forms of btpN4O3
with several amino acids were determined by potentiometry in
H2O–MeOH (50 : 50 v/v) solution at 298.2 K and 0.10 M
NMe4TsO. The values obtained are collected in Table S3 of the
ESI.†
Notes and references
1 J. M. Berg, J. L. Tymoczko and L. Stryer, Biochemistry, W. H. Freeman
& Co Ltd, New York, New York, 5th edn, 2002.
2 (a) J. W. Steed and J. L. Atwood, Supramolecular Chemistry, John Wiley
and Sons, Ltd, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2nd edn, 2009; (b) L. Mutihac,
J. H. Lee, J. S. Kim and J. Vicens, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 2777–
2796; (c) Y. Zhouab and J. Yoon, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 52–67.
3 J. L. Sessler and A. Andrievsky, Chem.–Eur. J., 1998, 4, 159–167, and
references therein.
4 (a) F. P. Schmidtchen, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 5161–5168;
(b) E. Kimura, H. Fujioka and M. Kodama, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1986, 1158–1159; (c) A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne,
C. McVeigh, G. E. M. Maguire, P. R. S. Maxwell and E. O’Hanlon,
Chem. Commun., 1996, 2191–2192; (d) S.-i. Sasaki, A. Hashizume,
D. Citterio, E. Fujii and K. Suzuki, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 7243–
7245; (e) R. J. Fitzmaurice, G. M. Kyne, D. Douheret and J. D. Kilburn,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2002, 841–864.
5 (a) O. Perraud, V. Robert, A. Martinez and J.-P. Dutasta, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2011, 17, 13405–13408; (b) O. Perraud, V. Robert, H. Gornitzka,
A. Martinez and J.-P. Dutasta, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 504–
508.
6 (a) S. O. Kang, J. M. Llinares, V. W. Day and K. Bowman-James, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3980–4003; (b) P. Mateus, N. Bernier and
R. Delgado, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254, 1726–1747; (c) S. O. Kang,
M. A. Hossain and K. Bowman-James, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2006, 250,
3038–3052; (d) V. McKee, J. Nelson and R. M. Town, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2003, 32, 309–325; (e) C. Seel and F. Vögtle, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1992, 31, 528–549.
Only species of 1 : 1 receptor to substrate stoichiometry were
found for the different protonation states of the receptor. The pro-
tonated forms of btpN4O3 show relatively modest association
constants for the binding of the studied amino acids, probably a
consequence of the high energetic cost of desolvation of the sub-
strates and of the close proximity of the anionic and cationic
functionalities, which mutually attenuates their respective
charges, thus lowering the effectiveness of charged receptors.15
It is also possible that the ammonium binding sites of the recep-
tor cause some repulsion on the ammonium group of the sub-
strates, disfavouring the movement of the amino acids towards
the receptor. In fact in the few examples of zwitterionic binding
by synthetic receptors in water4b or mixed MeOH–H2O,4a–d the
reported association constants (K) are in the range 17–360.
These values are lower than the ones obtained in this work.
The plot of Keff versus pH16 for the association of
n+
HnbtpN4O3 with the amino acid substrates is shown in Fig. 3.
For pH values below 6.2, where the receptor is mainly in the
triprotonated form and the substrates are all in their zwitterionic
form, the selectivity trend for the studied amino acids is
7 (a) P. Mateus, R. Delgado, P. Brandão and V. Félix, J. Org. Chem., 2009,
74, 8638–8646; (b) P. Mateus, R. Delgado, P. Brandão, S. Carvalho and
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 5529–5532 | 5531