T.G. Larocque, G.G. Lavoie / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 715 (2012) 26e32
31
4.2.2. Synthesis of TiCl2(2,6-OC6H3eMe2)2(1-(2,4,6-
trimethylphenyl)imidazole)2 (2)
(o-CH3(mesityl)). Not all 13C assignments could be made due to poorly
defined correlations from the broad resonances. FTIR (cast film)
A
solution of 1-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazole (144 mg,
nC ]
N 1610 cmꢀ1. Anal. Calcd for C31H35Cl2N3O2Ti (%): C, 62.01; H,
0.776 mmol) dissolved in toluene (5 mL) was added to a toluene
solution of TiCl2(2,6-OC6H3eMe2)2(THF)2 (196 mg, 0.388 mmol) and
the dark red solution was stirred at room temperature for 3 h.
Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure and the product
was purified by multiple recrystallisations from CH2Cl2 and pentane
5.88; N, 7.00. Found (%): C, 61.78; H, 6.12; N, 6.47.
4.3. General procedure for ethylene polymerisation
Ethylene polymerisation was performed at atmospheric pres-
sure and room temperature in a 200-mL Schlenk flask containing
a magnetic stir bar. The flask was conditioned in an oven at 160 ꢁC
for at least 12 h prior to use. The hot flask was brought to room
temperature under dynamic vacuum, and back-filled with ethylene.
This cycle was repeated a total of three times. Under an atmosphere
of ethylene, the flask was charged with 20 mL of dry toluene and
1000 equiv of methylaluminoxane (MAO). The solution was stirred
for 15 min before a solution of the catalyst in toluene was intro-
duced into the flask via a syringe. The reaction mixture was
vigorously stirred for 10 min after the addition of the catalyst, and
subsequently quenched with a 50:50 mixture of concentrated
hydrochloric acid and methanol. The resulting mixture was filtered
and any solid collected was washed with distilled water. Solids
collected were dried under vacuum at approximately 60 ꢁC for
several hours.
(201 mg, 70%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d 8.18 (s, 2H, NCHN(mesi-
tyl)), 7.74 (s, 2H, NCCHN(mesityl)), 6.94 (s, 4H, m-CH(mesityl)), 6.87
(d, J ¼ 7.4, 4H, m-CH(phenoxide)), 6.77 (s, 2H, NCHCN(mesityl)), 6.70 (t,
J ¼ 7.4, 2H, p-CH(phenoxide)), 2.33 (s, 18H, o-CH3(phenoxide), p-CH3(me-
sityl)), 1.95 (s, 12H, o-CH3(mesityl)); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
d
166.4 (Cipso(phenoxide)), 141.2 (NCHN), 139.6 (p-C(mesityl)), 134.8
(o-C(mesityl)), 132.4 (Cipso(mesityl)), 130.8 (NCCN), 129.4 (o-C(phenoxide)),
129.2 (m-CH(mesityl)), 127.9 (m-CH(phenoxide)), 121.7 (p-CH(phenoxide)),
118.8 (NCCN), 21.0 (p-CH3(mesityl)), 17.5 (o-CH3(phenoxide)), 17.3
(o-CH3(mesityl)). Anal. Calcd for C40H46Cl2N2O2Ti (%): C, 65.49; H,
6.32; N, 7.64. Found (%): C, 65.72; H, 6.13; N, 7.77.
4.2.3. Synthesis of TiCl2(1,2-OC6H4O)(C^Imine) (3)
A solution of C^Imine (150 mg, 0.401 mmol) dissolved in toluene
(2 mL) was added to a toluene solution (5 mL) of TiCl2(1,2-
OC6H4O)(THF)2 (149 mg, 0.401 mmol). The dark red solution was
allowed to stir for 4 h. The volume was reduced under reduced
pressure and the product was precipitated with pentane. The
supernatant was removed and the product was dried in vacuo to
yield a dark red powder. An analytically pure product was isolated
by recrystallisation from CH2Cl2 and pentane (202 mg, 84%). Crys-
tals suitable for X-ray diffraction study were grown at ꢀ35 ꢁC under
nitrogen by slow liquid diffusion of pentane into a saturated CH2Cl2
4.4. X-ray crystallographic studies
X-ray crystallographic data for compounds 1 and 2 were
collected at the University of Toronto on a Bruker-Nonius Kappa-
CCD diffractometer using monochromated Mo
Ka
radiation
¼ 0.71073 A) at 150 K and were measured using a combination of
scans and scans with offsets, to fill the Ewald sphere. Intensity
ꢀ
(
4
l
u
k
solution. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d
7.93 (d, J ¼ 2.0, 1H,
data were processed using the Denzo-SMN package [33]. Absorp-
tion corrections were carried out using SORTAV [34]. X-ray crys-
tallographic data for compound 3 was collected at McMaster
NCHCN(mesityl)), 7.07 (d, J ¼ 2.0, 1H, NCCHN(mesityl)), 7.03e6.99 (m,
4H, CH(aryl)), 6.41 (br s, 3H, m-CH(2,6-xylyl), p-CH(2,6-xylyl)), 5.88 (br s,
1H, m-CH(mesityl)), 5.40 (br s, 1H, m-CH(mesityl)), 2.47 (br s, 9H,
o-CH3(aryl)), 2.24 (s, 3H, p-CH3(mesityl)), 1.58 (br s, 3H, o-CH3(aryl)), 1.43
University on
chromated Mo K
measured using
a Bruker APEX2 diffractometer using mono-
ꢀ
a
radiation (
l
¼ 0.71073 A) at 100 K and were
(s, 9H, (CH3)3C); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
d 197.2 (NCN),
4
and scans. Unit cell parameters were deter-
u
166.9 (C]N), 158.7 (C(aryl)), 145.2 (C(aryl)), 139.4 (p-C(mesityl)), 134.8
(C(aryl)), 133.9 (C(aryl)), 129.3 (m-CH(mesityl)), 129.0 (C(aryl)), 128.3 (m-
CH(2,6-xylyl)), 126.7 (p-CH(2,6-xylyl)), 123.8 (NCCN(mesityl)), 119.9
(NCCN(mesityl)), 111.2 (o-C(mesityl)), 40.7 ((CH3)3C), 30.4 ((CH3)3C),
21.0 (p-CH3(mesityl)), 20.0 (o-CH3(mesityl)), 19.0 (o-CH3(2,6-xylyl)), 16.6
mined using at least 50 frames from three different orientations.
Data were processed using SAINT, and corrected for absorption
with accurate face-indexing as well as redundant data (SADABS),
and solved using direct methods and the SHELX program suite. The
structures were solved and refined using SHELXTL V6.1 [35] for full-
Table 2
Crystal data and structure refinement details for compounds 1, 2 and 3.
1
2
3
Empirical formula
Formula weight/g molꢀ1
Crystal size/mm
C41.5H50Cl3N3O2Ti
777.10
C40H46Cl2N4O2Ti
733.61
0.26 ꢂ 0.20 ꢂ 0.14
2.55e27.50
ꢃ11; ꢃ17; ꢀ20,21
Triclinic
C38.5H52.5Cl2N3O2Ti
708.14
0.25 ꢂ 0.22 ꢂ 0.20
2.64e27.50
ꢀ23,22; ꢀ12,13; ꢀ26,27
Monoclinic
P21/n
18.2261(5)
10.6412(3)
21.3160(6)
90
0.31 ꢂ 0.27 ꢂ 0.23
1.73e26.36
ꢀ17,16; ꢀ20,19; ꢀ22,16
Monoclinic
P21/c
13.7876(18)
16.111(2)
18.264(2)
90
q
Range/deg
h; k; l Range
Crystal system
Space group
P-1
ꢀ
a/A
8.8050(2)
13.5093(4)
16.7090(4)
98.6120(12)
104.3730(16)
91.6390(16)
2
ꢀ
b/A
ꢀ
c/A
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢁ
/
a
/
b
/
110.3690(10)
90
4
109.588(2)
90
4
g
Z
Dcalcd/Mg mꢀ3
1.332
1.283
1.231
F(000)
1636
772
1506
No. of reflns collected/unique
No. data/restrnts/params
21,314/8744
8744/0/482
0.0612, 0.1498
0.1234, 0.1850
1.040
22,446/8648
8648/0/452
0.0589, 0.1453
0.1199, 0.1811
1.035
42,162/7768
7768/7/421
0.0561, 0.1464
0.0882, 0.1711
1.045
Final R indices [F2 < 2 (F2)]: R1, wR2
s
R indices (all data): R1, wR2
Goodness-of-fit on F2