K. Ellard et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 4546–4549
4549
Table 3
All compounds showed a reduction in neutrophil count, with
statistical significance demonstrated for 9n and 11d which showed
a 37% and 34% reduction in neutrophil accumulation resepectively
(P <0.05), thus providing validation for these chemotypes in a
respiratory inflammation model.
In conclusion, a series of urea triazolopyrimidines were synthe-
sized with excellent c/d potency and high selectivity over the other
isoforms and the general kinome. Significant efficacy for two com-
pounds from different sub-series was observed in a preliminary,
inhaled, asthma model. The physicochemical properties of these
molecules preclude them from oral absorption but lend themselves
to an inhaled method of delivery and therefore respiratory diseases
which represent a considerable area of unmet medical need.
Physicochemical data and in vitro PK for selected ureas
a
a
Mwt
PSA
clogP
Clint
Clint
Caco-2b
Kin
solc
(human)
(rat)
9d
9n
11a
11d
503
526
474
517
142
176
161
160
2.3
2.3
1.5
1.6
1.4
0.5
0
0.9
0.9
0.4
0.8
n.d.
65
0.54/109
0.08/252
n.d.
<6.5
>100
>100
0
a
b
c
Microsomal clearance (mL/min/g liver).
Papp, A–B (Â10À6 cm sÀ1)/efflux ratio.
Kinetic solubility precipitation range (
l
M), 1% DMSO.
efflux.18 When 11d was evaluated in rat pharmacokinetics no
measurable exposure was obtained upon oral administration, and
rapid elimination (>200 mL/min/kg) was observed on intravenous
dosing. Plasma samples were analyzed for parent 4 or possible
hydrolysis product, acid 10 but no trace of either, potentially active
metabolite, was detected. As this was not in-line with the in vitro
microsomal stability, the in vivo clearance is most likely attributed
to a transporter mediated clearance mechanism. Of all of the
urea sub-series, the glycinamides exhibited the highest kinetic
solubility.
We postulated that the physico-chemical properties of the
ureas made them suitable for inhaled delivery as this would enable
the drug to be delivered directly to the airways, thus bypassing the
GI tract. Low absorption and high clearance is also desirable in this
delivery method to minimize systemic exposure and thus potential
side effects.19 Efficacy of PI3K inhibitors had also been previously
demonstrated in murine respiratory models.11
A moleculefrom each subserieswas progressed to an LPS induced
pulmonary neutrophilia model as a preliminary in vivo surrogate for
asthma.20 The LPS challenge rapidly produces an inflammatory
response, dominated by neutrophils. Compounds were assessed by
their ability to reduce the accumulation of these immune cells.
9d, 9n, 11d and dexamethasone (0.5 mg) were dosed intrat-
racheally, 1 hour prior to LPS challenge to BalbC, non-fasted mice
(eight mice per group). Eight hours later the bronchoalveolar lung
fluid (BALF) was collected and neutrophils were counted (Fig. 4).
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Thilo Werner and the
biochemistry group for profiling; Warren Miller for computational
chemistry and graphics preparation; Paloma Diaz for purification
and analysis; Pneumolabs for performing the in vivo experiments;
and Tammy Ladduwahetty for invaluable advice on manuscript
preparation.
References and notes
1. Wymann, M. P.; Pirola, L. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1436, 127.
2. Thomas, M.; Owen, C. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2008, 8, 267.
3. Marone, R.; Cmiljanovic, V.; Giese, B.; Wymann, M. P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
2008, 1784, 159.
4. Ward, S.; Sotosios, Y.; Dowden, J.; Bruce, I.; Finan, P. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 207.
5. Vanhaesbroeck, B.; Ali, K.; Bilancio, A.; Geering, B.; Foukas, L. C. Trends Biochem.
Sci. 2005, 30, 194.
6. Ameriks, M. K.; Venable, J. D. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 738.
7. Palanki, M. S. S.; Dneprovskaia, E.; Doukas, J.; Fine, R. M.; Hood, J.; Kang, X.;
Lohse, D.; Martin, M.; Noronha, G.; Soll, R. M.; Wrasidlo, W.; Yee, S.; Zhu, H. J.
Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 4279.
8. Williams, O.; Houseman, B. T.; Kunkel, E. J.; Aizenstein, B.; Hoffman, R.; Knight,
A.; Shokat, K. M. Chem. Biol. 2010, 17, 123.
9. Subramaniam, P. S.; Whye, D. W.; Efimenko, E.; Chen, J.; Tosello, V.; De
Keersmaecker, K.; Kashisian, A.; Thompson, M. A.; Castillo, M.; Cordon-Cardo,
C.; Dave, U. P.; Ferrando, A.; Lannutti, B. J.; Diacovo, T. G. Cancer Cell 2012, 21,
459.
10. Perry, B.; Beevers, R.; Bennett, G.; Buckley, G.; Crabbe, T.; Gowers, L.; James, L.;
Jenkins, K.; Lock, C.; Sabin, V.; Wright, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5299.
11. Doukas, J.; Eide, L.; Stabbins, K.; Racanelli-Layton, A.; Dellamry, L.; Martin, M.;
Dneprovskaia, E.; Noronha, G.; Soll, R.; Wrasidlo, W.; Acevedo, L. M.; Cheresh,
D. A. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 328, 758.
12. Bergamini, G.; Bell, K.; Shimamura, S.; Werner, T.; Cansfield, A., Müller, K.,
Perrin, J.; Rau, C.; Ellard, K.; Hopf, C.; Doce, C.; Leggate, D.; Mangano, R.;
Mathieson, T.; O’Mahony, A.; Plavec, I.; Rharbaoui, F.; Reinhard, F.; Savitski, M.
M.; Ramsden, N.; Hirsch, E.; Drewes, G.; Rausch, O.; Bantscheff, M.; Neubauer,
13. PDB code: 4AOF.
14. Knight, Z. A.; Chiang, G. G.; Alaimo, P. J.; Kenski, D. M.; Ho, C. B.; Coan, K.;
Abraham, R. T.; Shokat, K. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 4749.
15. For experimental procedures see: Ramsden, N.; Bell, K.; Taylor, J.; Sunose, M.;
Middlesmiss, D.; Ellard, K. PCT Int. Appl. WO2010092015, 2010.
16. Rommel, C.; Camps, M.; Ji, H. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 7, 191.
17. Assessed by a <20% inhibition of binding to Kinobeads at 1 lM, for materials
and method see: Bantscheff, M.; Eberhard, D.; Abraham, Y.; Bastuck, S.;
Boesche, M.; Hobson, S.; Mathieson, T.; Perrin, J.; Raida, M.; Rau, C.; Reader, V.;
Sweetman, G.; Bauer, A.; Bouwmeester, T.; Hopf, C.; Kruse, U.; Neubauer, G.;
Ramsden, N.; Rick, J.; Kuster, B.; Drewes, G. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1035.
18. Veber, D. F.; Johnson, S. R.; Cheng, H.-Y.; Smith, B. R.; Ward, K. W.; Kopple, K. D.
J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615.
19. Millan, D. S.; Bunnage, M. E.; Burrows, J. L.; Butcher, K. J.; Dodd, P. G.; Evans, T.
J.; Fairman, D. A.; Hughes, S. J.; Kilty, I. C.; Lemaitre, A.; Lewthwaite, R. A.;
Mahnke, A.; Mathias, J. P.; Philip, J.; Smith, R. T.; Stefaniak, M. H.; Yeadon, M.;
Phillips, C. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 7797.
20. The LPS induced pulmonary neutrophilia model was carried out by
Pneumolabs (UK) Ltd, London.
Figure 4. Bar graphs representing the total number of neutrophils in BALF of LPS
exposed mice pre-treated with test compounds or dexamethasone. Each column
represents the mean of eight animals. Changes were compared to the vehicle
control animals using ANOVA followed by Dunnets test: ⁄P <0.05 and ⁄⁄P <0.01.