strategy to overcome these limitations could possibly be to
develop a consecutive protocol under which the aryl CÀH
bond instead of the catalyst would be initially oxidized,
regioselectively affording the functionalized intermediate
that could participate in further Pd0-catalyzed carbonylation
to yield the desired carbonyl compound.
and low yield of N-unprotected indole-3-carboxylates
(27%À52%).11
Thereupon, we envision that an efficient and general Pd-
catalyzed direct carbonylation of indoles to synthesize
indole-3-carboxylates would be more fascinating than
the existing protocols and the key issue should be regio-
control, which has not been successfully resolved by a Pd
catalyst system todate. Recently, Daugulis et al. reported a
CuI/I2 catalyzed cross-coupling of (hetero)aromatic CÀH
bonds with excellent regioselectivity in which the electron-
rich arene was originally oxidized by iodine and followed
by Cu-catalyzed arylation with another aromatic CÀH
bond.12 Enlightened by that, we assume Pd0/I2 could be an
ideal catalyst system to control the positional selectivity
and yield of indole-3-carboxylate through two consecutive
in situ steps: oxidation of indole to afford 3-iodoindole and
its further carbonylation (Scheme 1, Path 4). Herein, we
reveal this novel Pd-catalyzed oxidative carbonylation of
indole with alcohol and phenol in the presence of iodine
and K2CO3 under 1 atm of CO to form corresponding
indole-3-carboxylates after the screening of reaction con-
ditions (Supporting Information Table S1).
Figure 1. Representative indole-3-carboxylate derivatives with
bioactivity.
The substituted indole nucleus is a structural component
of a number of biologically active compounds such as
tropisetron (Figure 1, compound 1), which has been
proven to act as a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor
(5-HT3) antagonist and used to prevent chemotherapy-
induced digestiveside effects.7,8 Traditionally, the prepara-
tion of indole-3-carboxylate derivatives required multistep
reactions via its carboxylic acid or acid chloride intermedi-
ates (Scheme 1, Path 1).9 Recently, Lei et al. developed a
Pd-catalyzed direct carbonylation of N-substituted indole
to form indole-3-carboxylate, but this carbonylation took
place at the N-position to afford indole carbamates when
the substrate was extended to free (NH)-indole (Path 2).10
Meanwhile, our group also disclosed a similar oxidative
carbonylation procedure to generate desired indole-3-
carboxylates using the [Rh(COD)Cl]2/K2S2O8 catalyst
system, and the substrate scope was applicable to various
N-substituted indoles and even part of free (NH)-indole
(Path 3). However, there have been far more hurdles to
overcome in view of the high price of the rhodium catalyst
Scheme 1. Transformation of Free (NH)-Indole to Indole-3-
carboxylate or Indole Carbamate
With the optimized conditions in hand, we next explored
the substrate scope of the carbonylation of indole with
alcohol (Scheme 2); the present Pd(OAc)2/I2 catalyst sys-
tem showed good tolerance to the variation of indole
substituents (3aÀ3k), giving indole-3-carboxylates with
moderate to excellent yield. In general, indoles bearing
anelectron-donating group (methylormethoxylgroup) on
the benzene ring (3bÀ3e) regardless of the position showed
better reactivity compared with those bearing ester, cyano,
or other electron-withdrawing groups (3fÀ3k), suggesting
that the electron-donating substituent might facilitate the
iodination step occurring on the C3-position of indole and
then accelerate the following carbonylation. It is noteworthy
that indoles with a halide (3hÀ3k) could smoothly undergo
the reaction with the halide remaining, thus providing
potential for further functionalizations. Additionally, alkyl
(6) (a) Guan, Z.-H.; Ren, Z.-H.; Spinella, S. M.; Yu, S.; Liang, Y.-M.;
Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 729. (b) Li, H.; Cai, G.-X.; Shi,
Z.-J. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 10442. (c) Haffemayer, B.; Gulias, M.;
ꢀ
Gaunt, M. J. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 312. (d) Lopez, B.; Rodriguez, A.;
Santos, D.; Albert, J.; Ariza, X.; Garcia, J.; Granell, J. Chem. Commun.
2011, 47, 1054. (e) Dai, H.-X.; Stepan, A. F.; Plummer, M. S.; Zhang,
Y.-H.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7222. (f) Hasegawa, N.;
Charra, V.; Inoue, S.; Fukumoto, Y.; Chatani, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 8070. (g) Du, Y.; Hyster, T. K.; Rovis, T. Chem. Commun.
2011, 47, 12074. (h) Wrigglesworth, J. W.; Cox, B.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.;
Booker-Milburn, K. I. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5326.
(7) (a) Bandini, M.; Eichholzer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
9608. (b) Bartoli, G.; Bencivenni, G.; Dalpozzo, R. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2010, 39, 4449. (c) Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, PR215.
(d) Shiri, M. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3508.
(8) (a) Richardson, B. P.; Engel, G.; Donatsch, P.; Stadler, P. A.
Nature 1985, 316, 126. (b) Clark, R. D.; Miller, A. B.; Berger, J.; Repke,
D. B.; Weinhardt, K. K.; Kowalczyk, B. A.; Eglen, R. M.; Bonhaus,
D. W.; Lee, C.-H.; Miche1, A. D.; Smith, W. L.; Wong, E. H. F. J. Med.
Chem. 1993, 36, 2645.
(9) Peterson, P. E.; Wolf, J. P., III; Niemann, C. J. Org. Chem. 1958,
23, 303.
(10) Zhang, H.; Liu, D.; Chen, C.; Liu, C.; Lei, A. Chem.;Eur. J.
2011, 17, 9581.
(11) Lang, R.; Wu, J. L.; Shi, L. J.; Xia, C. G.; Li, F. W. Chem.
(12) (a) Do, H.-Q.; Daugulis, O. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 421. (b) Do,
H.-Q.; Daugulis, O. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2517. (c) Do, H.-Q.; Daugulis, O.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13577.
Commun. 2011, 47, 12553.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 16, 2012
4131