Y. Ye et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 5405–5409
5409
targeting for tumor optical imaging. The results also support our
hypothesis that the divalent compound can simultaneously bind
to two adjacent integrin vb3 proteins and exhibit synergistic ef-
fects on receptor- and tumor-targeting. Furthermore, the linker
of a divalent ligand plays an important role in achieving significant
synergistic effects.4,31 The 27-atom length between the two RGD
References and notes
1. Xiong, J. P.; Stehle, T.; Diefenbach, B.; Zhang, R.; Dunker, R.; Scott, D. L.;
Joachimiak, A.; Goodman, S. L.; Arnaout, M. A. Science 2001, 294, 339.
2. Tucker, G. C. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2003, 4, 722.
3. Chen, X.; Sievers, E.; Hou, Y.; Park, R.; Tohme, M.; Bart, R.; Bremner, R.; Bading,
J. R.; Conti, P. S. Neoplasia 2005, 7, 271.
4. Liu, S. Mol. Pharm. 2006, 3, 472.
5. Hsu, A. R.; Veeravagu, A.; Cai, W.; Hou, L. C.; Tse, V.; Chen, X. Recent Pat.
Anticancer Drug Discov. 2007, 2, 143.
a
motifs of 1 may be sufficiently long to span two adjacent
for simultaneous binding, leading to improvement in the integrin
vb3 binding affinity and related tumor targeting (Fig. 5). There-
fore, compound 1 could serve as a prototype for constructing and
optimizing novel integrin vb3-targeted compounds for the early
avb3
6. Schottelius, M.; Laufer, B.; Kessler, H.; Wester, H. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42,
969.
a
7. Zannetti, A.; Del Vecchio, S.; Iommelli, F.; Del Gatto, A.; De Luca, S.; Zaccaro, L.;
Papaccioli, A.; Sommella, J.; Panico, M.; Speranza, A.; Grieco, P.; Novellino, E.;
Saviano, M.; Pedone, C.; Salvatore, M. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 5224.
8. Temming, K.; Schiffelers, R. M.; Molema, G.; Kok, R. J. Drug Resist Update 2005,
8, 381.
9. Benezra, M.; Penate-Medina, O.; Zanzonico, P. B.; Schaer, D.; Ow, H.; Burns, A.;
DeStanchina, E.; Longo, V.; Herz, E.; Iyer, S.; Wolchok, J.; Larson, S. M.; Wiesner,
U.; Bradbury, M. S. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 2768.
10. Reynolds, A. R.; Hart, I. R.; Watson, A. R.; Welti, J. C.; Silva, R. G.; Robinson, S. D.;
Da Violante, G.; Gourlaouen, M.; Salih, M.; Jones, M. C.; Jones, D. T.; Saunders,
G.; Kostourou, V.; Perron-Sierra, F.; Norman, J. C.; Tucker, G. C.; Hodivala-Dilke,
K. M. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 392.
11. Achilefu, S. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2004, 3, 393.
12. Achilefu, S.; Dorshow, R. B.; Bugaj, J. E.; Rajagopalan, R. Invest. Radiol. 2000, 35,
479.
a
diagnosis and targeted therapy of tumors.
There was high accumulation of 1 in the liver (Fig. 4), which sug-
gests its clearance from circulation through the reticulo-endothelial
system (RES). The strong NIR fluorescence in the mice over 24 h
post-injection of 1 demonstrates the in vivo stability of 1 and its
possible metabolites. As reported previously, NIR fluorescent IR-
Dye800-RGD conjugates showed rapid clearance via the kidneys,
and low tumor fluorescence ensued at 4 h post injection.38 These
differences illustrate the important roles of the dye motif and the re-
lated hydrophilicity in the dynamics of divalent molecular imaging
probes. These results also provide an insight into further structural
modification of the cypate motif to minimize non-specific binding
13. Bugaj, J. E.; Achilefu, S.; Dorshow, R. B.; Rajagopalan, R. J. Biomed. Opt. 2001, 6,
122.
14. Ye, Y.; Chen, X. Theranostics1, 102.
so as to enhance integrin avb3 and tumor-selective targeting.
15. Achilefu, S.; Bloch, S.; Markiewicz, M. A.; Zhong, T.; Ye, Y.; Dorshow, R. B.;
Chance, B.; Liang, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 7976.
16. Ye, Y.; Bloch, S.; Xu, B.; Achilefu, S. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 2268.
17. Edwards, W. B.; Akers, W. J.; Ye, Y.; Cheney, P. P.; Bloch, S.; Xu, B.; Laforest, R.;
Achilefu, S. Mol. Imaging 2009, 8, 101.
18. Ye, Y.; Bloch, S.; Kao, J.; Achilefu, S. Bioconjug. Chem. 2005, 16, 51.
19. Ye, Y.; Bloch, S.; Xu, B.; Achilefu, S. Bioconjug. Chem. 2008, 19, 225.
20. Pu, Y.; Wang, W. B.; Tang, G. C.; Zeng, F.; Achilefu, S.; Vitenson, J. H.; Sawczuk,
I.; Peters, S.; Lombardo, J. M.; Alfano, R. R. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2005, 4,
429.
21. Ye, Y.; Xu, B.; Nikiforovich, G. V.; Bloch, S.; Achilefu, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2011, 21, 2116.
22. Chen, X.; Park, R.; Tohme, M.; Shahinian, A. H.; Bading, J. R.; Conti, P. S.
Bioconjug. Chem. 2004, 15, 41.
23. Chen, X.; Plasencia, C.; Hou, Y.; Neamati, N. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 1098, 48.
24. Weiss, S.; Keller, M.; Bernhardt, G.; Buschauer, A.; Konig, B. Bioorg Med Chem18,
6292.
25. Kumar, C. C.; Nie, H.; Rogers, C. P.; Malkowski, M.; Maxwell, E.; Catino, J. J.;
Armstrong, L. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1997, 283, 843.
Noteworthy, the modular approach we have used for synthesis
of 1 allows for convenient preparation of such divalent conjugates
in solution and / or on solid support. A vast array of molecules with
distinct chemical and biological characteristics can be obtained by
varying the peptide, linker, and cypate to elucidate the structure-
activity relationship and mechanism of molecular targeting. In
addition to integrin avb3, various cancer cell surface receptors such
as somatostatin, growth factor, and steroid receptors associated
with cancer initiation and progression have been reported.
Therefore, cypate can serve as a unique fluorescent linker for
conveniently constructing diverse divalent ligands to explore
ligand-receptor and receptor-receptor interactions by optical
imaging.
In summary, we have synthesized and evaluated a novel fluo-
rescent divalent c(RGDfK) analog 1 based on cypate for integrin
26. Borgne-Sanchez, A.; Dupont, S.; Langonne, A.; Baux, L.; Lecoeur, H.; Chauvier,
D.; Lassalle, M.; Deas, O.; Briere, J. J.; Brabant, M.; Roux, P.; Pechoux, C.; Briand,
J. P.; Hoebeke, J.; Deniaud, A.; Brenner, C.; Rustin, P.; Edelman, L.; Rebouillat, D.;
Jacotot, E. Cell Death Differ. 2007, 14, 422.
avb3 targeted optical imaging of tumors. The promising in vitro
and in vivo data suggest that fluorescent divalent ligands of this
type serve as an important strategy for exploring receptor-targeted
optical imaging and provide insight into a better understanding of
ligand design principles, structural optimization, and mechanism
of action for specific receptor-targeting.
27. Werner, E.; Werb, Z. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158, 357.
28. Vaidyanath, A.; Hashizume, T.; Nagaoka, T.; Takeyasu, N.; Satoh, H.; Chen, L.;
Wang, J.; Kasai, T.; Kudoh, T.; Satoh, A.; Fu, L.; Seno, M. J Cell Mol Med15, 2525.
29. Xu, L.; Vagner, J.; Alleti, R.; Rao, V.; Jagadish, B.; Morse, D. L.; Hruby, V. J.; Gillies,
R. J.; Mash, E. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20, 2489.
30. Knor, S.; Sato, S.; Huber, T.; Morgenstern, A.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Schmitt, M.;
Kessler, H.; Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R.; Magdolen, V.; Seidl, C. Eur. J. Nucl.
Med. Mol. Imaging 2008, 35, 53.
Acknowledgment
31. Shewmake, T. A.; Solis, F. J.; Gillies, R. J.; Caplan, M. R. Biomacromolecules 2008,
9, 3057.
32. Ryppa, C.; Mann-Steinberg, H.; Biniossek, M. L.; Satchi-Fainaro, R.; Kratz, F. Int.
J. Pharm. 2009, 368, 89.
This study is based upon work supported in part by the NIH
grants R01 CA109754, R33 CA123537, R01 EB008111, and R01
EB007276.
33. Liu, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, F.; Chen, X. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2009, 36, 1296.
34. Shi, J.; Kim, Y. S.; Zhai, S.; Liu, Z.; Chen, X.; Liu, S. Bioconjug. Chem. 2009, 20, 750.
35. Aaron, J.; Nitin, N.; Travis, K.; Kumar, S.; Collier, T.; Park, S. Y.; Jose-Yacaman,
M.; Coghlan, L.; Follen, M.; Richards-Kortum, R.; Sokolov, K. J. Biomed. Opt.
2007, 12, 034007.
Supplementary data
36. Jin, Z. H.; Furukawa, T.; Waki, A.; Akaji, K.; Coll, J. L.; Saga, T.; Fujibayashi, Y.
Biol. Pharm. Bull 33, 370.
37. Cheng, Z.; Wu, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Gambhir, S. S.; Chen, X. Bioconjug. Chem. 2005, 16,
1433.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
38. Ye, Y.; Zhu, L.; Ma, Y.; Niu, G.; Chen, X. Bioorg. med. chem. lett. 21, 1146.