Table 1. Ring Expansion Reaction of Ketone 1 with Various Silyldiazomethanes
entry
diazomethane
conditions
3 yield (%)
4 yield (%)
5 yield (%)
6 yield (%)
1
2a
2b
R = H
MeOH, rt, 45 min
3a
0
4a
4ac
49
5a
1a
6a
6b
4a
1d
2b
R = SiMe3
BF3 OEt2, MS 4 A, CH2Cl2,
3ac
3ac
3d
75
6
5b
5c
5d
13d
˚
3
ꢀ80 °C, 50 min,
then PPTS, CH2Cl2/MeOH
3
4
2c
R = SiMe2Ph
BF3 OEt2, MS 4 A, CH2Cl2,
79
57
4ac
4d
2
6
5
0
6c
0
1
˚
3
ꢀ80 °C, 3 h,
then PPTS, CH2Cl2/MeOH
˚
2d
R = Si(Oi-Pr)2Me
BF3 OEt2, MS 4 A, CH2Cl2,
6d
3
ꢀ80 °C, 1 h
a Spiro-epoxides 5a and 6a were isolated as a mixture. b The yield of the major product was previously reported in ref 8b. Complete byproduct
yields, however, are newly reported. c In entries 2 and 3, desilylated seven-membered ketone 3a and 4a (R = H) were isolated after PPTS treatment.
d Spiro-epoxides 5b and 6b were isolated as a mixture.
always (1) a seven-membered ketone that is generated
by migration of the less-hindered secondary carbon. Small
amounts of (2) a regioisomeric seven-membered ketone,
which is generated by migration of the sterically hindered
carbon, and (3) a spiro-epoxide formed by 3-exo cycliza-
tion are also produced as byproducts.
With regard to the mechanism of the ring expansion
reaction, both the Seto9 and Cushman10 groups proposed
that axial attack of TMS-diazomethane on six-membered
ketones is the first step in the ring expansion reaction. The
fact that only a small amount of epoxide arising from the
axial attack of TMS-diazomethane (3) was isolated in our
previous study,8c however, suggests that the major isomer
results from an equatorial attack on the ketone (1).
In addition, we are confident that seven-membered
ketones are generated from the equatorial attack of TMS-
diazomethane for the following reasons. First, in general,
BF3-promoted nucleophilic addition reactions of carbon
nucleophiles with six-membered ketones provide equatorial
adducts.11 Second, diazomethane approaches from the
equatorial side of ketones in the ring expansion reac-
tion without a Lewis acid.12 Therefore, we report here a
combined experimental and computational study of the
ring expansion reaction with silylated diazomethanes
to gain insight into the stereochemical course of the
reaction.
We selected the six-membered ketone 1 as a substrate
because its conformation is fixed as in the case of trans-
decalone. The first reaction was conducted with diazo-
methane 2a in methanol in the absence of a Lewis acid
(Table 1, entry1). Ketone4awasobtainedasa major prod-
uct generated by the migration of an electron-rich bond
according to the general trend of migration aptitude, as
well as a small amount of the mixture of spiro-epoxides 5a
and 6a in a 28:72 ratio.12a Ring expansion with TMS-
diazomethane 2b in the presence of BF3 OEt2 gave ketone
3
3a as a major product in 75% yield (entry 2).8b Careful
analysis of the byproducts led to the isolation of the
regioisomeric ketone 4a and two diastereomeric epoxides
5b and 6b in 6%, 13%, and 1%, respectively. The major
R-epoxide 5b came from the axial attack of TMS-diazo-
methane 2b, and the TMS group was located at the less
hindered side of the molecule.8c We next examined reac-
tions with a bulky silyldiazomethane 2c to increase the ratio
of the equatorial attack (entry 3). The yield of the seven-
membered ketones 3a was slightly increased, and the
R-epoxide 5c was obviously decreased, as expected. In
the reaction with bulkier diazomethane 2d, silylketones
3d and 4d were isolated following column chromatography
(entry 4). The configuration of the major ketone 3d was
(6) Dabrowski, J. A.; Moebius, D. C.; Wommack, A. J.; Kornahrens,
A. F.; Kingsbury, J. S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3598–3601.
(7) The migratory aptitude of ring expansion reactions using diazo-
€
methanes varies depending on Lewis acids. For example: (a) Muller, E.;
€
Lurken, W.; Bauer, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1962, 3, 775–778. (b) Mori, Y.;
Yaegashi, K.; Furukawa, H. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 12917–12932. (c)
Kreuzer, T.; Metz, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 572–579.
(8) (a) Mori, Y.; Yaegashi, K.; Furukawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 4557–4558. (b) Mori, Y.; Hayashi, H. Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
1789–1797. (c) Mori, Y.; Nogami, K.; Hayashi, H.; Noyori, R. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 9050–9060. (d) Sakai, T.; Sugimoto, A.; Mori, Y. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 5850–5853.
(9) Seto, H.; Fujioka, S.; Koshino, H.; Hayasaka, H.; Shimizu, T.;
Yoshida, S.; Watanabe, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2359–2362.
(10) Wang, Z.; Yang, D.; Mohanakrishnan, A. K.; Fanwick, P. E.;
Nampoothiri, P.; Hamel, E.; Cushman, M. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43,
2419–2429.
(12) (a) Carlson, R. G.; Behn, N. S. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 2069–2073.
(b) Jones, B.; Price, P. J. Chem. Soc. D: Chem. Commun. 1969, 1478–1479.
(13) Unfortunately, the stereochemistry of the regioisomer 4d could
not be determined unambiguously (see Supporting Information).
(11) (a) Trost, B. M.; Bonk, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1778–
1781. (b) Jenkins, T. J.; Burnell, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1485–1491.
(c) Crane, S. N.; Jenkins, T. J.; Burnell, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
8722–8729.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 17, 2012
4565