Scheme 1. Ring Closing Methods in the Syntheses of the Iso-
plagiochin C/D Framework
Figure 2. Absolute configuration of (À)-isoplagiochin D (1) and
(À)-isoplagiochin C (2); * = configurationally stable, o = con-
figurationally unstable (the most stable diastereomer is shown).
Many members of the bis(bibenzyl) family have been
synthesized; the routes and strategies have been reviewed
very recently.11 Ring closure proved to be the main chal-
lenge because efficiency, not surprisingly, depends on ring
strain, substitution pattern, and concomitant dimeriza-
tion. In the total syntheses yet described for isoplagiochins
C (2) and D (1) or derivatives, ring closure was realized
by (a) Wittig reaction,12 (b) McMurry reaction,13 both be-
tween ring moieties A and D, and (c) SuzukiÀMiyaura
coupling14 between C and D (Scheme 1).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Precursor 13 for a Heck Coupling
We were now focused on alternative methods enabling
enantioselective routes to the isoplagiochin framework.
We had to consider that the biaryl axis between rings C and
D is configurationally stable only in the macrocyclic con-
text, so that general methods for the atroposelective synth-
esis of axially chiral biaryls15 could not be simply adopted.
The atropo-divergent step rather had to include or follow
the ring closure. The catalytic enantioselective Suzuki
coupling is yet not a generally approved method due to
the harsh required reaction conditions.14,16 Also, Wittig
and McMurry procedures lack enantioselective protocols.
For the first time in the field of macrocyclic bis(bibenzyls)
we attempted the Heck methodology17 for synthesis. In-
tramolecular variants have been broadly used in natural
(8) Toyota, M.; Yoshida, T.; Kan, Y.; Takaoka, S.; Asakawa, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 4745–4748.
(9) Scher, J. M.; Zapp, J.; Becker, H.; Kather, N.; Kolz, J.; Speicher,
A.; Dreyer, M.; Maksimenka, K.; Bringmann, G. Tetrahedron 2004, 60,
9877–9881.
€
(10) Bringmann, G.; Muhlbacher, J.; Reichert, M.; Dreyer, M.; Kolz,
J.; Speicher, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9283–9290.
(11) Harrowven, D.C.;Kostiuk, S.L. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 223–242.
(12) Eicher, T.; Fey, S.; Puhl, W.; Buchel, E.; Speicher, A. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 877–888.
(13) Speicher, A.; Kolz, J.; Sambanje, R. P. Synthesis 2002, 2503–
2512.
product syntheses;18 asymmetric intramolecular var-
iants using BINAP and DIOP ligands were developed
by Shibasaki19 and Overman,20 but only for the con-
struction of chiral carbon centers, not for axially chiral
compounds.
(14) Esumi, T.; Wada, M.; Mizushima, E.; Sato, N.; Kodama, M.;
Asakawa, Y.; Fukuyama, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6941–6945.
(15) Bringmann, G.; Mortimer, A. J. P.; Keller, P. A.; Gresser, M. J.;
Garner, J.; Breuning, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5384–5427.
(16) Yin, J.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12051–
12052.
(17) Oestreich, M., Ed. The MizorokiÀHeck Reaction; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2009.
(19) Sato, Y.; Sodeoka, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
4738–4739.
(20) Carpenter, N. E.; Kucera, D. J.; Overman, L. E. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 5846–5848.
(18) (a) Link, J. T.; Overman, L. E. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-
Coupling Reactions; Stang, P. J., Diederick, F., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim:
1998; pp 231À269. (b) de Meijere, A.; Meyer, F. E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1994, 33, 2379–2411.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 17, 2012
4549