(4ꢀ6).8 These heterocycles would be derived from acyclic
bis-allylic alcohols, protected to form a more reactive
allylic system.
temperatures, resulting in low levels of diastereoselectivity.
Nguyen reported that an allylic imidate is a highly reactive
leaving group for allylic amination, allowing the addition
of secondary amines which were not reactive with acetates
or carbonates.6i Diols 2 were converted to the desired bis-
imidates 3 in good yields using trichloroacetonitrile and
DBU (Scheme 2).
Scheme 1. Formation of Bis-allylic Alcohols 2 from Cyclic
Diolsa
Scheme 2. Formation of Bis-imidates 3 from Diols 2a
a Yields refer to purified material after isolation by column chroma-
tography over silica gel.
The synthetic sequence began with cyclic diols 1, which
were commercially available in the cases of 1a (X = O) and
1b (X = CH2), or could be formed in a single step by a
dihydroxylation of commercially available N-Boc 2,5-
dihydropyrrole in the case of 1c (X = N-Boc).9 Oxidative
cleavage of the diol with di(acetoxy)iodobenzene in DCM,
followed by addition of vinylmagnesium bromide to the
crude dialdehyde at low temperature, cleanly afforded the
desired bis-allylic alcohols 2 (Scheme 1).10 Attempts to
purify the dialdehyde were unsuccessful due to issues with
stability and volatility, favoring the one-pot procedure.
While there are examples of allylic amination reactions
on allylic alcohols, this reactivity typically favors mono-
amination and does not provide the desired heterocycles in
our system.6 The desired product could be formed using a
bis-allylic acetate or bis-allylic carbonate, but the reactivity
was poor and the reactions only went tocompletion at high
a Yields refer to purified material after isolation by column chroma-
tography over silica gel.
With the desired bis-imidates in hand, a variety of
reaction conditions were screened to determine which
combination of catalyst, amine, and solvent would lead
to selective formation of the desired 2,6-cis heterocycles.
When bis-imidate 3a was exposed to a primary benzyla-
mine derivative in the presence of an iridium(I) catalyst the
major product was the desired divinyl morpholine 4.
Palladium(0) gave the product in lower yields. Amides,
carbamates, and sulphonamides proved to be poor reac-
tion partners, giving little to no desired products under a
variety of conditions. Benzylamine gave the product in
acceptable yield, but the diastereoselectivity was poor and
slightly favored the undesiredtrans diastereomer (Table 1).
Reactions withtritylamine asthe nitrogen sourcegavehigh
yields but poor selectivity under a variety of conditions.
Cumylamine proved to be the best nitrogen source for the
allylic amination reactions, providing the desired morpho-
line product in high yields and favoring the desired cis
(6) (a) Takeuchi, R.; Ue, N.; Tanabe, K.; Yamashita, K.; Shiga, N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9525–9534. (b) Matunas, R.; Lai, A. J.; Lee,
C. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6298–6308. (c) Defieber, C.; Ariger, M. A.;
Moriel, P.; Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3139–3143.
(d) Pouy, M. J.; Leitner, A.; Weix, D. J.; Ueno, S.; Hartwig, J. F. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 3949–3952. (e) Singh, O. V.; Han, H. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
4801–4804. (f) Evans, P. A.; Clizbe, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
8722–8723. (g) Vrieze, D. C.; Hoge, G. S.; Hoerter, P. Z.; Van Haitsma,
J. T.; Samas, B. M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3140–3142. (h) Roggen, M.;
Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11917–11919. (i) Arnold,
J. S.; Stone, R. F.; Nguyen, H. M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4580–4583. (j)
Tosatti, P.; Horn, J.; Campbell, A. J.; House, D.; Nelson, A.; Marsden,
S. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 352, 3153–3157. (k) Lafrance, M.; Roggen,
M.; Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3470–3473. For an
example using Au(III), see: Guo, S.; Song, F.; Liu, Y. Synlett 2007, 6,
964–968.
1
isomer, which was assigned based on H NMR analysis.
After screening a number of solvents it was found that
dichloroethane and toluene both gave moderate diaste-
reoselectivity, favoring the desired 2,6-cis isomer of mor-
pholine 4. More polar solvents typically gave good yields
but poor diastereoselectivity.11
Further reaction optimization found that the best cata-
lyst for the bis-allylic amination reaction was the commer-
cially available [Ir(cod)Cl]2, and the optimum conditions
were found when the reaction was run in dichloroethane
starting at 0 °C and allowed to warm slowly to room
temperature over 18 h (2 h of warming followed by 16 h at
ambient temperature; see Table 2). Reactions in toluene
also gave good levels of selectivity but typically gave
slightly lower yields. Reactions at lower temperature gave
lower yields due toincomplete conversion. Careful workup
was necessary to remove the catalyst, since it is highly
soluble in a variety of organic solvents. Prolonged exposure
(7) (a) Miyabe, H.; Yoshida, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Matsumura, A.;
Takemoto, Y. Synlett 2003, 1031–1033. (b) Welter, C.; Dahnz, A.;
Brunner, B.; Streiff, S.; Dubon, P.; Helmchen, G. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
1239–1242.
(8) For some reviews of ring closing metathesis, see: (a) Grubbs,
R. H.; Miller, S. J.; Fu, G. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 446–452. (b)
Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7117–7140. (c) Deiters, A.; Martin,
S. F. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2199–2238. (d) Hoveyda, A. H.; Zhugralin,
A. R. Nature 2007, 450, 243–251. For examples of RCM to form bridged
systems, see: (e) Aggarwal, V. K.; Astle, C. J.; Rogers-Evans, M. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 1469–1471. (f) Kuznetsov, N. Y.; Khrustalev, V. N.;
Godovikov, I. A.; Bobnov, Y. N. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 113–120.
(g) Cheng, G.-L.; Wang, X.-Y.; Zhu, R.; Shao, C.-W.; Xu, J.-M.; Hu,
Y.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 2694–2700.
(9) N-Boc dihydropyrrole was dihydroxylated using OsO4/NMO
conditions; see Supporting Information for details.
(10) Nicolaou, K. C.; Adsool, V. A.; Hale, C. R. H. Org. Lett. 2010,
12, 1552–1555.
(11) Reactions in propionitrile, DMSO, diglyme, and diethyl ether
also gave moderate yields and low levels of diastereoselectivity. Reac-
tions did not proceed in heptane, presumably due to poor solubility
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX