Despite the significant progress made in this area the more
challenging areneÀalkane couplings remain scarce which
is due to the inertness of sp3 CÀH bonds;6 thus muchofit is
yet to be explored. Very specifically pertaining to the
substrate directed areneÀalkane coupling there is only a
single precedence where 2-phenylpyridine or analogous
substrates have undergone direct CÀH alkylation using
unreactive cycloalkane as the other coupling partner (path
a, Scheme 1).6a However, the susceptibility of benzylic
CÀH bonds toward radical promoted functionalizations
by a single electron transfer (SET) have led to them being
the subject of further exploration.7
donor atoms. The first invokes a CDC approach8 that
usesaldehydesor alcoholsastheacylating equivalent(path
b, Scheme 1) while the second strategy proceeds through a
substrate-directed decarboxylation of R-keto carboxylic
acids.9 However, the present protocol (path c, Scheme 1)
demonstrates an unprecedented areneÀalkane coupling
(CÀC bond formation) with a subsequent CÀO bond
formation via four tandem CÀH bond activations to
selectively install an aroyl moiety at the proximal site of
directing group containing substrates.
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditions
Scheme 1. CDC Approaches for CÀC Bond Forming Reactions
via CÀH Bond Cleavage
entry
catalyst (mol %)
oxidant
temp (°C)
yield (%)a,b
1
Pd(OAc)2 (5)
Pd(TFA)2 (5)
PdCl2 (5)
TBHPc,f
TBHPc,f
TBHPc,f
TBHPc,f
TBHPc,f
TBHPc,g
TBHPd,g
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
100
120
120
53
15
30
42
73
85
20
00
77
00
00
2
3
4
PdBr2 (5)
5
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
Pd(OAc)2 (10)
nil
6
7
e,g
8
H2O2
9
TBHPc,g
Nil
In light of the above-mentioned, an initial foray was
intended toward CÀH benzylation using 2-phenylpyridine
(1) (1 equiv) and toluene (a) (10 equiv) as the prototypical
substrates using Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %) and TBHP in decane
(5À6 M) (1 equiv). Interestingly, the reaction of the afore-
mentioned combinations at 120 °C resulted in an unpre-
cedented formation of phenyl(2-(pyridine-2-yl)phenyl)-
methanone (1a), an aroylated product (53%) instead of
the expected benzylated product (Table 1, entry 1). Thus,
toluene could be perceived as a new synthetic equivalent or
surrogate of the benzoyl functionality. In this case, incor-
porating a benzoyl functionality at the proximal site is at
the expense of four consecutive CÀH bond (three sp3
benzylic CÀH bonds and one sp2 arene CÀH bond)
cleavages. Prior to this report, the directed CÀH ortho-
acylation has been accomplished via two distinct ap-
proaches with substrates possessing various N and O
10
11
TBHPc
a Isolated yield. b Reaction time: 1.5 h. c Decane solution (5À6 M).
d 70% aqueous solution. e 30% aqueous solution. f 1 equiv. g 2 equiv.
Further optimizations were carried out by varying the
reaction parameters in a quest to improve the overall yield.
Other potential Pd catalysts such as Pd(TFA)2, PdCl2, and
PdBr2 wereevaluated(Table 1, entries2À4), and Pd(OAc)2
was the most effective catalyst giving superior results
(Table 1, entry 1). The use of Pd(TFA)2 gave poor con-
version (15%) along with the formation of multitudes of
side products (Table 1, entry 2). Although the reactions
withPdCl2 andPdBr2 (Table1, entries 3À4) wereclean and
smooth, the yields were modest as compared to that for
Pd(OAc)2 (Table 1, entry 1). An increase in the catalyst
loading to 10 mol % and in the TBHP quantity by 2-fold
provided substantial improvement in the isolated yield
(85%) (Table 1, entry 6). The nature of peroxides and their
medium of storage had a marked influence on the pro-
duct yield. For instance the use of either aqueous TBHP
or aqueous H2O2 as the oxidants proved to be ineffec-
tive (Table 1, entries 7À8). A decrease in the reaction
temperature (100 °C) reduced the product yield to 77%
(Table 1, entry 9). Control experiments carried out in the
absence of either Pd(OAc)2 or TBHP failed to give the
desired product (Table 1, entries 10À11) suggesting the
(7) (a) Fructos, M. R.; Trofimenko, S.; Mar Dıaz- Requejo, M.;
´
ꢀ
Perez, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11784. (b) Bhuyan, R.;
Nicholas, K. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3957. (c) Liang, C.; Collet, F.;
€
Robert-Peillard, F.; Muller, P.; Dodd, R. H.; Dauban, P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 343. (d) Fan, H.; Powell, D. A. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75,
2726. (e) Kim, H. J.; Kim, J.; Cho, S. H.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 16382. (f) Ni, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Xiong, T.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.;
Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1244.
(8) (a) Jia, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, W.; Luo, F.; Cheng, J. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 3120. (b) Basle’, O.; Bidange, J.; Shuai, Q.; Li, C.-J. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2010, 352, 1145. (c) Xiao, F.; Shuai, Q.; Zhao, F.; Basle’, O.;
Deng, G.; Li, C.-J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1614. (d) Chan, C.-W.; Zhou, Z.;
Chan, A. S. C.; Yu, W.-Y. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3926. (e) Wu, Y.; Li, B.;
Mao, F.; Li, X.; Kwong, F. Y. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3258. (f) Li, C.; Wang,
L.; Li, P.; Zhou, W. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 10208. (g) Chan, C.-W.;
Zhou, Z.; Yu, W.-Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 2999. (h) Park, J.;
Park, E.; Kim, A.; Lee, Y.; Chi, K. W.; Kwak, J. H.; Jung, Y. H.; Kim,
I. S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4390.
(9) (a) Fang, P.; Li, M. Z.; Ge, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
11898. (b) Li, M.; Ge, H. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3464.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX