Month 2012 Synthesis and Structure of 3,4‐Dihydropyrido[2′,3′:3,4]pyrazolo[1,5‐a][1,3,5]triazin‐2‐amines
Table 2
Spectral data of 4‐(het)aryl‐3,4‐dihydropyrido[2′,3′:3,4]pyrazolo[1,5‐a][1,3,5]triazin‐2‐amines (5).
Dimethyl sulfoxide‐d6/TMS, δ (ppm)
Compound
1H‐NMR (300 MHz)
13C‐NMR (75 MHz)
5a
6.52 (2H, s, NH2), 6.79 (1H, dd, 3 J = 8.1, 3J = 4.3 Hz, H‐9),
6.89 (1H, s, H‐4), 7.27–7.44 (5H, m, Ph), 7.96 (1H, dd,
3J = 8.1, 4J = 1.8 Hz, H‐10), 8.01 (1H, s, NH), 8.41 (1H,
dd, 3J = 4.3, 4 J = 1.8 Hz, H‐8)
69.0 (C‐4), 103.4 (C‐10a), 113.7 (C‐9), 126.1 (C‐2′
and C‐6′), 128.6 (C‐3′ and C‐5′), 128.8 (C‐4′),
130.1 (C‐10), 140.6, 140.7 (C‐10b and C‐1′),
151.3 (C‐8), 153.1 (C‐6a), 157.4 (C‐2)
20.6 (Me), 68.8 (C‐4), 103.4 (C‐10a), 113.6 (C‐9), 126.0
(C‐2′ and C‐6′), 129.0 (C‐3′ and C‐5′), 130.0 (C‐10),
137.9 (C‐4′), 138.2 (C‐1′), 140.5 (C‐10b), 151.2 (C‐8),
153.1 (C‐6a), 157.3 (C‐2)
3
5b
5c
2.28 (3H, s, Me), 6.44 (2H, s, NH2), 6.78 (1H, dd, J = 8.3,
3J = 4.1 Hz, H‐9), 6.82 (1H, d, 3J = 1.9 Hz, H‐4),
3
7.15–7.23 (4H, m, C6H4), 7.90 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, NH),
3
7.94 (1H, dd, J = 8.3, 4J = 1.5 Hz, H‐10), 8.40 (1H, dd,
3J = 4.1, 4J = 1.5 Hz, H‐8)
3.73 (3H, s, OMe), 6.43 (2H, s, NH2), 6.77 (1H, dd, 3J = 8.3,
3J = 4.1 Hz, H‐9), 6.81 (1H, d, 3J = 1.5 Hz, H‐4), 6.94
55.1 (OMe), 68.7 (C‐4), 103.4 (C‐10a), 113.6 (C‐9), 113.9
(C‐3′ and C‐5′), 127.5 (C‐2′ and C‐6′), 130.0 (C‐10),
132.9 (C‐1′), 140.5 (C‐10b), 151.2 (C‐8), 153.1 (C‐6a),
157.3 (C‐2), 159.6 (C‐4′)
3
(2H, d, 3J = 8.7 Hz, H‐3′ and H‐5′), 7.23 (2H, d,
J = 8.7 Hz, H‐2′ and H‐6′), 7.87 (1H, d, 3 J = 1.5 Hz, NH),
7.93 (1H, dd, J = 8.3, 4J = 1.8 Hz, H‐10), 8.39 (1H, dd,
3
3J = 4.1, 4J = 1.8 Hz, H‐8)
3
5d
6.50 (2H, s, NH2), 6.79 (1H, dd, 3J = 8.3, J = 4.1 Hz, H‐9),
68.2 (C‐4), 103.4 (C‐10a), 113.8 (C‐9), 128.0, 128.6 (C‐2′
and C‐6′ and C‐3′ and C‐5′), 130.0 (C‐10), 133.3 (C‐4′),
139.6 (C‐1′), 140.6 (C‐10b), 151.4 (C‐8), 153.0 (C‐6a),
157.4 (C‐2)
6.91 (1H, d, 3J = 1.9 Hz, H‐4), 7.31 (2H, d, 3J =
8.5 Hz, H‐2′ and H‐6′), 7.48 (2H, d, 3J = 8.5 Hz, H‐3′
and H‐5′), 7.94 (1H, dd, 3J = 8.3, 4J = 1.5 Hz, H‐10),
7.97 (1H, d, 3J = 1.8 Hz, NH), 8.41 (1H, dd, 3J = 4.1,
4J = 1.8 Hz, H‐8)
5e
5f
δ 6.39–6.56 (4H, m, NH2, H‐3′, and H‐4′), 6.78 (1H, dd,
3J = 8.3, 3J = 4.1 Hz, H‐9), 6.95 (1H, s, H‐4), 7.64 (1H,
s, H‐5′), 7.87–7.99 (2H, m, H‐10 and NH), 8.41 (1H, dd,
3J = 4.1, 4J = 1.9 Hz, H‐8)
63.0 (C‐4), 103.4 (C‐10a), 108.4, 110.4 (C‐3′ and C‐4′),
113.7 (C‐9), 130.0 (C‐10), 140.6 (C‐10b), 143.6 (C‐5′),
151.4 (C‐8), 151.9 (C‐2′), 153.1 (C‐6a), 157.4 (C‐2)
3
6.54 (2H, s, NH2), 6.79 (1H, dd, 3J = 7.9, J = 4.1 Hz, H‐9),
65.1 (C‐4), 103.5 (C‐10a), 113.8 (C‐9), 125.9, 126.6, 127.2
(C‐3′, C‐4′, and C‐5′), 130.0 (C‐10), 140.1 (C‐10b), 143.9
(C‐2′), 151.4 (C‐8), 152.9 (C‐6a), 157.4 (C‐2)
7.01 (1H, dd, 3J = 4.9, 3J = 3.8 Hz, H‐4′), 7.14–7.22
(2H, m, H‐4 and H‐3′), 7.53 (1H, dd, 3J = 5.3,
4J = 0.8 Hz, H‐5′), 7.93 (1H, dd, 3J = 8.3, 4J = 1.9 Hz,
H‐10), 8.08 (1H, s, NH), 8.42 (1H, dd, 3J = 4.1, 4J =
1.9 Hz, H‐8)
3
5g
5h
6.45 (2H, s, NH2), 6.79 (1H, d, 3 J = 8.3, J = 4.1 Hz, H‐9),
69.9 (C‐4), 103.5 (C‐10a), 113.6 (C‐9), 120.9 (C‐3′), 124.1
(C‐5′), 130.1 (C‐10), 137.3 (C‐4′), 141.1 (C‐10b), 149.4
(C‐6′), 151.4 (C‐8), 153.1 (C‐6a), 157.3 (C‐2), 158.3 (C‐2′)
3
6.88 (1H, d, 3J = 1.9 Hz, H‐4), 7.18 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz,
H‐3′), 7.39 (1H, dd, 3 J = 7.5, 3 J = 4.9 Hz, H‐5′), 7.82
(1H, td, 3J = 7.6, 4J = 1.6 Hz, H‐4′), 7.96 (1H, dd, 3J = 8.3,
3
4J = 1.5 Hz, H‐10), 8.03 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, NH), 8.41
4
3
(1H, dd, 3J = 4.1, J = 1.9 Hz, H‐8), 8.57 (1H, d, J =
4.5 Hz, H‐6′)
6.61 (2H, s, NH2), 6.81 (1H, dd, 3 J = 8.1, 3J = 4.1 Hz, H‐9),
67.7 (C‐4), 103.4 (C‐10a), 113.9 (C‐9), 120.8 (C‐3′
and C‐5′), 130.1 (C‐10), 140.8 (C‐10b), 148.4 (C‐4′),
150.1 (C‐2′ and C‐6′), 151.6 (C‐8), 153.0 (C‐6a),
157.5 (C‐2)
4
6.96 (1H, s, H‐4), 7.27 (2H, dd, 3 J = 4.3, J = 1.5 Hz, H‐3′
and H‐5′), 7.96 (1H, dd, 3J = 8.1, 4J = 1.7 Hz, H‐10), 8.11
(1H, s, NH), 8.44 (1H, dd, 3J = 4.1, 4J = 1.7 Hz, H‐8), 8.61
4
(2H, dd, 3J = 4.3, J = 1.5 Hz, H‐2′ and H‐6′)
The coupling of the H‐4 and NH signals (3J = 0–1.9 Hz) in
1H NMR spectra of 5 suggested the equilibrium to be shifted
toward 3,4‐dihydro‐tautomeric form A. In a 2D NOESY
experiment conducted on 6, a strong pair of cross‐peaks
was observed for the gem‐dimethyl signal at 1.72 ppm and
the N H signal at 7.62 ppm. The close spatial relationship
of the methyl groups and the proton at annular nitrogen atom
might correspond to the 3,4‐dihydro‐ (A) or 4,6‐dihydro‐ (C)
tautomeric forms. X‐ray crystallographic study [23] on 6 was
performed to differentiate between these two tautomers. The
crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained
by recrystallization of 6 from ethanol. The molecule of 6
crystallized together with one ethanol molecule, therefore
providing the ethanol monosolvate of 6. Similarly to the
previously reported [10,24] fused gem‐dimethyl substituted
amino‐1,3,5‐triazines, 6 existed in the crystal as a tautomer
with the labile hydrogen atom located at the triazine nitro-
gen atom adjacent to the quaternary sp3‐hybridized carbon
atom (Fig. 1). Considering the similarity of the spectral
data for 5–7, we concluded that 3,4‐dihydro‐tautomeric
form A was generally preferred in solution and solid states
for all series of the compounds.
Pyrido[2′,3′:3,4]pyrazolo[1,5‐a][1,3,5]triazines 5–7 un-
derwent a series of biological screening assays. They showed
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
DOI 10.1002/jhet