Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
In nature, water is used for biosynthetic reactions to
sustain life in enzymatic processes, inducing hydrophobic
interactions between enzyme and substrates.[11] From the
perspective of green chemistry as well as increased scientific
efforts to mimic nature, tremendous effort has recently been
applied to develop asymmetric catalytic reactions in aqueous
environments.[12] Recently, the Schreiner[13] and Rueping[14]
research groups independently reported that hydrogen-bond-
promoted organocatalysis could remarkably be amplified in
aqueous environments by the “hydrophobic hydration
effect”.[15] Soon after, we[16] and Armas research group[17]
also reported successful hydrogen bonding promoted asym-
metric catalytic reactions in aqueous medium. In particular,
we observed that the hydrophobic amplification[13] was
significantly dependent upon the hydrophobicity of the
catalysts.[16b] For example, in the Michael addition reactions
of simple nitroalkenes with malonates, using a hydrophobic
cinchona catalyst, even a highly challenging Michael donor
such as dimethyl methyl malonate could be smoothly
converted to the desired adduct. Thus, we envisioned that
hydrophobic amplification “on water”[18,19] conditions would
enable unprecedented Michael addition of challenging b,b-
disubstituted nitroalkenes with malonate derivatives (Sche-
me 1b).
a Michael donor, no obvious conversion was detected both in
organic solvents and “on water” system. However, dithio-
malonate 2c—a reactivity-enhanced malonate surrogate[20]
—
led to a striking rate difference in the Michael addition
between the reactions in an organic solvent and “on water”
(Figure 2). When the reactions were performed in toluene,
CH2Cl2, or THF, no conversion was observed. However, with
the “on water” condition (on brine[21]), the reaction was
completed after 48 h, presumably due to the hydrophobic
hydration effect. Evidence for the hydrophobic hydration
effect on rate acceleration was obtained using an antihydro-
phobic LiClO4.[15a] In the aqueous LiClO4 solution, less than
5% of conversion was observed after 96 h.
With the promising preliminary results in hand, we next
explored the enantioselective Michael reaction of (E)-a-
methyl-b-nitrostyrene (1a) with dithiomalonate 2c on brine
using a variety of cinchona-based bifunctional organocata-
lysts. However, the use of readily available cinchona-based
bifunctional catalysts, quinine-based sulfonamide QN-SA,
thiourea QN-TU and N-squaramide QN-N-SQA led to
unsatisfactory enantioselectivities (5–66% ee) (Scheme 2).
Here, we report the highly enantioselective organocata-
lytic Michael addition of dithiomalonates to b,b-disubstituted
nitroalkenes in water. The obtained Michael adducts could
smoothly be converted into diverse chiral GABA analogs
with all-carbon quaternary stereogenic centers at the b-
position, which might show interesting pharmaceutical prop-
erties.
Initially, we examined Michael addition reactions of
highly unreactive (E)-a-methyl-b-nitrostyrene (1a) with
dibenzyl malonate (2a), dibenzyl monothiomalonate (2b) or
dibenzyl dithiomalonate (2c) in the presence of triethyl amine
as a catalyst at ambient temperature. As shown in Figure 2,
when malonate 2a or monothiomalonate 2b was employed as
Scheme 2. Preliminary catalyst screening.
Gratifyingly, the squaramide catalyst QN-SQA was found to
be a promising catalyst, showing remarkably higher enantio-
selectivity (77% ee) than those obtained with other catalysts
(Scheme 2, for more results for catalyst screening, see the
Supporting Information). Note that, all catalysts examined in
this study showed no activity in pure organic solvents such as
toluene and CH2Cl2.
Although “on water” reaction conditions enabled the
unprecedented catalytic reaction, ee values achieved with
QN-SQA catalyst and its derivatives were still unsatisfactory.
However, to our delight, the addition of hydrophobic co-
solvents such as, for example, toluene, o-, m- and p-xylene,
mesitylene, hexane, and cyclohexane, yielded enhanced
enantioselectivity (Table 1, see the Supporting Information
for details). For example, the enantioselectivity was increased
from 77% ee to 86% ee by adding 7 equiv of o-xylene (entry 3
in Table 1). However, the reverse mixing of solvents (i.e.,
brine as an additive (7 equiv) in o-xylene) did not promote the
reaction, which is a further evidence of the hydrophobic
hydration effect on the rate acceleration. To further improve
the yields and enantioselectivity, the effect of the substituents
(R) of dithiomalonates 2 in our reaction system was also
Figure 2. Relative reactivity of malonate types in various reaction
media.[a] [a] Reaction was carried out using 1a (0.1 mmol), 2
(1.2 equiv) and NEt3 (20 mol%) in the indicated reaction medium
(2.0 mL) at RT for 48 h. The yield was determined by H NMR
integration.
1
2
ꢀ 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!